journal article·2019-03

Improved fatigue crack growth resistance by retrogression and re‐aging heat treatment in 7010 aluminum alloy

Nandana M.S., Udaya Bhat K., Manjunatha C.M.

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Aircraft grade 7010 aluminum alloy was heat treated to two different conditions: (1) standard peak aging (T6) and (2) retrogression and re‐aging (RRA). The microstructures of these alloys were characterized by using transmission electron microscope. Fatigue crack growth rate (FCGR) tests were conducted using standard compact tension specimens, following ASTM standards. Tests were conducted at various stress ratios, R ranging from 0.1 to 0.7. The RRA‐treated alloy was observed to contain coarsened η′ (MgZn2) precipitates with higher inter‐particle spacing when compared with T6‐treated alloy. The grain boundary precipitates (GBPs) were also coarsened and discontinuous in RRA‐treated alloy as compared with continuous GBPs in T6 condition. The FCGR was lower and ΔKthwas higher in RRA‐treated alloy compared with T6‐treated alloy at all the stress ratios investigated. Improved fatigue crack growth resistance in RRA‐treated alloy was correlated to the modified microstructure and enhanced crack closure levels.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Fatigue and fracture mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering National Institute of Technology Karnataka Surathkal, Mangalore 575025 India

Structural Technologies Division CSIR‐National Aerospace Laboratories Bangalore 560017 India

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s40195-015-0275-z10.1007/s40195-015-0275-z ↗
2. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.519-521.127110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.519-521.1271 ↗
3. 10.1016/S1003-6326(14)63306-910.1016/S1003-6326(14)63306-9 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.05.01710.1016/j.actamat.2010.05.017 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00219-810.1016/S0924-0136(99)00219-8 ↗
6. 10.1007/BF0054182510.1007/BF00541825 ↗
7. 10.1007/s11837-003-0194-810.1007/s11837-003-0194-8 ↗
8. CinaB Inventor; srael Aircraft Ind Ltd assignee.Reducing the susceptibility of alloys particularly aluminium alloys to stress corrosion cracking. US patent US3856584A1973.
9. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.03610.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.036 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0261-3069(97)00084-810.1016/S0261-3069(97)00084-8 ↗
11. Improvement of stress corrosion cracking (SCC) resistance of a 7150 Al‐Zn‐Mg‐Cu alloy by retrogression and reageing (RRA) treatment
12. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.08.02510.1016/j.msea.2007.08.025 ↗
13. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.519-521.45510.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.519-521.455 ↗
14. 10.1016/S1003-6326(14)63351-310.1016/S1003-6326(14)63351-3 ↗
15. 10.1007/s11665-018-3268-z10.1007/s11665-018-3268-z ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.03410.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.034 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.05.01610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.05.016 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00159-110.1016/S0142-1123(01)00159-1 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.07.06310.1016/j.msea.2006.07.063 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.01.05510.1016/j.msea.2011.01.055 ↗
21. 10.1111/ffe.1216310.1111/ffe.12163 ↗
22. 10.1016/0025-5416(85)90276-910.1016/0025-5416(85)90276-9 ↗
23. 10.1007/s11665-012-0169-410.1007/s11665-012-0169-4 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.06310.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.063 ↗
25. Residual stresses in machined surfaces
26. ASTM E8/E8M‐16a.Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. ASTM International West Conshohocken PA;2016.
27. ASTM E647‐15e1 A.Standard test method for measurement of fatigue crack growth rates. ASTM International West Conshohocken PA;2015.
28. Fatigue crack closure evaluation under constant amplitude and spectrum loading10.1520/JTE12183J ↗
29. 10.1016/S1003-6326(16)64221-810.1016/S1003-6326(16)64221-8 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.matchar.2016.06.02310.1016/j.matchar.2016.06.023 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.04.04310.1016/j.msea.2006.04.043 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.02.03910.1016/j.msea.2008.02.039 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jmst.2016.11.00810.1016/j.jmst.2016.11.008 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.matchar.2009.06.00710.1016/j.matchar.2009.06.007 ↗
35. 10.1115/1.365690010.1115/1.3656900 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.09.00810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.09.008 ↗
37. 10.1007/978-1-4020-6808-910.1007/978-1-4020-6808-9 ↗
38. 10.1016/0013-7944(83)90144-310.1016/0013-7944(83)90144-3 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.02.01310.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.02.013 ↗
40. 10.1016/0921-5093(94)90351-410.1016/0921-5093(94)90351-4 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.prostr.2017.07.07210.1016/j.prostr.2017.07.072 ↗
42. 10.1016/0013-7944(70)90028-710.1016/0013-7944(70)90028-7 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.05.03810.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.05.038 ↗
44. 10.1016/0025-5416(88)90547-210.1016/0025-5416(88)90547-2 ↗
45. 10.1007/s12540-013-2009-y10.1007/s12540-013-2009-y ↗
46. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2010.01546.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2010.01546.x ↗
47. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.519-521.43110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.519-521.431 ↗
48. 10.2320/matertrans.L-MZ20112310.2320/matertrans.L-MZ201123 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.04.00410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.04.004 ↗