Interfacial fracture toughness measurement of welded Babbitt alloy SnSb11Cu6/20Steel
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The interface fracture toughness of SnSb11Cu6/20steel was measured by calculating the critical energy release rate and stress phase angle of the interface crack. A three‐point bending test was used to introduce cracks into the bonding interface, and the cohesion model of the bonding interface was established through experimental data. Through finite element analysis of load‐deflection curves with and without interface crack propagation, the crack initiation point is found. Then the energy calculation model of crack propagation is established, and the critical energy release rate is obtained using the virtual crack growth criterion. The calculation results of the stress phase angle show that the crack propagation is greatly affected by the normal stress after the babbitt alloy layer fractures. If the strength of the substrate material is weaker, the crack will continue to expand in the tangent perpendicular to the crack tip.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Engineering Research Center of Heavy Machinery Ministry of Education Taiyuan University of Science and Technology Taiyuan China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Interface bonding properties of multi‐layered metal composites using material composition method
2. 10.1016/j.triboint.2017.07.02610.1016/j.triboint.2017.07.026 ↗
3. A modified mixed‐mode bending specimen for the interfacial fracture testing of dissimilar materials
4. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.10238110.1016/j.tafmec.2019.102381 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00087-410.1016/S0022-5096(01)00087-4 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00091-610.1016/S0013-7944(00)00091-6 ↗
7. 10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00352-310.1016/S1359-6454(99)00352-3 ↗
8. SalganikRL. The strength of adhesive joints using the theory of cracks10.1007/BF00186749 ↗
9. 10.1115/1.317607810.1115/1.3176078 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.03.00810.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.03.008 ↗
11. 10.1007/BF0003549310.1007/BF00035493 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2009.10.00110.1016/j.tafmec.2009.10.001 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.mser.2013.11.00110.1016/j.mser.2013.11.001 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.04.07410.1016/j.matdes.2014.04.074 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.15110.1016/j.dental.2009.11.151 ↗
16. The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids
17. 10.1016/j.dental.2016.09.03110.1016/j.dental.2016.09.031 ↗
18. Fracture toughness of the interface between Ni‐Cr/ceramic, alumina/ceramic and zirconia/ceramic systems
19. Anderson TL · 1995
20. 10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00256-810.1016/S1359-6454(03)00256-8 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70164-910.1016/S0065-2156(08)70164-9 ↗
22. 10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00254-210.1016/S1359-6454(99)00254-2 ↗
23. Hibbit Karlsson and Sorensen.ABAQUS reference manuals Version 6.5. Providence RI2004.
24. 10.1016/0045-7825(77)90023-810.1016/0045-7825(77)90023-8 ↗
25. 10.1002/nme.162009011410.1002/nme.1620090114 ↗
26. 10.1016/0013-7944(91)90144-P10.1016/0013-7944(91)90144-P ↗
27. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2009.01.02210.1016/j.mechmat.2009.01.022 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.mee.2005.06.00610.1016/j.mee.2005.06.006 ↗