Mesoscopic mechanisms in fatigue crack initiation in an aluminium alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The mechanistic aspects of process of initiation of a mode‐I fatigue crack in an aluminium alloy (AA 2219‐T87) are studied in detail, both computationally as well as experimentally. Simulations are carried out under plane strain conditions with fatigue process zone modelled as stress‐state–dependent cohesive elements along the expected mode‐I failure path. An irreversible damage parameter that accounts for the progressive microstructural damage due to fatigue is employed to degrade cohesive properties. The simulations predict the location of initiation of the fatigue crack to be subsurface where the triaxiality and the opening tensile stresses are higher in comparison with that at the notch surface. Examination of the fracture surface profile of fracture test specimens near notch tip reveals a few types of regions and existence of a mesoscopic length scale that is the distance of the location of highest roughness from the notch root. A discussion is developed on the physical significance of the experimentally observed length scale.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Applied Mechanics Indian Institute of Technology Madras Chennai‐36 India
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/BF0018262810.1007/BF00182628 ↗
2. 10.1016/0013-7944(72)90047-110.1016/0013-7944(72)90047-1 ↗
3. 10.1017/CBO978051180657510.1017/CBO9780511806575 ↗
4. Roles of microstructure in fatigue crack initiation
5. Mechanics of materials fatigue crack initiation life prediction for aluminium alloy 7075 using crystal plasticity finite element simulations
6. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.01.04410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.01.044 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00253-510.1016/S0020-7683(00)00253-5 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0013-7944(02)00034-610.1016/S0013-7944(02)00034-6 ↗
9. A cohesive zone model for fatigue crack growth allowing for crack retardation
10. 10.1115/1.402311010.1115/1.4023110 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0020-7683(98)00059-610.1016/S0020-7683(98)00059-6 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.02.00210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.02.002 ↗
13. A cohesive model for fatigue failure of polymers
14. Cohesive zone modelling of low cycle fatigue cracks in cracked and notched specimens
15. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.11.00210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.11.002 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.03.01810.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.03.018 ↗
17. High‐ and low‐cycle fatigue crack initiation using polycrystal plasticity
18. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.07.01510.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.07.015 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.07.01510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.07.015 ↗
20. Role of stress‐state on initiation and growth of a fatigue crack
21. Triaxiality dependent cohesive zone model
22. 10.1007/s10704-013-9837-010.1007/s10704-013-9837-0 ↗
23. Lemaitre J · 2012
24. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.04.02810.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.04.028 ↗
25. 10.1016/0304-3991(92)90117-310.1016/0304-3991(92)90117-3 ↗
26. 10.1023/A:101830022668210.1023/A:1018300226682 ↗
27. Simulation of dynamic ductile crack growth using strain‐rate and triaxiality‐dependent cohesive elements
28. 10.1016/0001-6160(63)90008-710.1016/0001-6160(63)90008-7 ↗
29. 10.1115/1.315759910.1115/1.3157599 ↗
30. MughrabiH WangR DiffertK EssmannU.Fatigue crack initiation by cyclic slip irreversibilities in high‐cycle fatigue. In: Fatigue Mechanisms: Advances in Quantitative Measurement of Physical Damage: ASTM International;1983:5‐541.10.1520/STP30551S ↗
31. 10.1098/rsta.2014.013210.1098/rsta.2014.0132 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.02.00410.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.02.004 ↗