journal article·2022-01

Crack initiation and propagation characteristics of a dual‐phase Mg–Li alloy under high‐cycle and very‐high‐cycle fatigue regimes

Xiangyu Wang, Chao He, Xue Li, Yongjie Liu, Qingyuan Wang, Lang Li, Hong Zhang, Chong Wang

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Ultralight Mg–Li alloys are promising aerospace materials as they are the lightest structural alloys at present; however, their fatigue behaviors remain to be explored. This work focuses on the fatigue strength and crack initiation behavior of an extruded dual‐phase Mg–Li alloy (LZ91) under high‐cycle and very‐high‐cycle fatigue regimes. The fatigue limit of LZ91 alloy at 109 cycles was determined to be 78 MPa, and the fatigue ratio is 0.46. Microstructural characterization demonstrates that fatigue cracks tend to initiate at β‐Li phase‐enriched regions. The α‐Mg phase presents a < > fiber texture with a basal plane that has low deformation in the extrusion direction and acts as an enhanced phase in relation to the β‐Li phase. Deformation discrepancies cause localized cyclic plasticity at the Li phase that leads to fatigue crack initiation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Deep Earth Science and Engineering, Ministry of Education, College of Architecture and Environment Sichuan University Chengdu China

Failure Mechanics and Engineering Disaster Prevention and Mitigation, Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province Sichuan University Chengdu China

School of Architecture and Civil Engineering Chengdu University Chengdu China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S1006-7191(08)60054-X10.1016/S1006-7191(08)60054-X ↗
2. 10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01351-410.1016/S0921-5093(00)01351-4 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.03.07410.1016/j.msea.2012.03.074 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.aap871610.1126/science.aap8716 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.03910.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.039 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0921-5093(04)00942-610.1016/S0921-5093(04)00942-6 ↗
7. 10.1179/1743280414Y.000000004410.1179/1743280414Y.0000000044 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.10.00710.1016/j.compscitech.2006.10.007 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.04410.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.044 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.02510.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.025 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.08.01910.1016/j.msea.2010.08.019 ↗
12. Bathias C · 2005
13. 10.1046/j.1460-2695.1999.t01-1-00185.x10.1046/j.1460-2695.1999.t01-1-00185.x ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.03.01010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.03.010 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.10.00910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.10.009 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.11.03210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.11.032 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.02.02310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.02.023 ↗
18. Murakami Y · 2019
19. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.02.00310.1016/j.msea.2008.02.003 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.03.01510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.03.015 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.08.00110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.08.001 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.10.11110.1016/j.matdes.2015.10.111 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.15211710.1016/j.jallcom.2019.152117 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.11.03810.1016/j.msea.2008.11.038 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.07.08110.1016/j.msea.2010.07.081 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.physb.2004.03.13310.1016/j.physb.2004.03.133 ↗
27. 10.1088/0022-3727/46/14/14530410.1088/0022-3727/46/14/145304 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.30310.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.303 ↗
29. 10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00436-110.1016/S1359-6454(03)00436-1 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.10.08810.1016/j.jallcom.2017.10.088 ↗
31. High‐cycle fatigue behavior of Mg‐8Li‐3Al‐2Zn‐0.5 Y alloy under different states
32. 10.1080/02670836.2017.140755610.1080/02670836.2017.1407556 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10572010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105720 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10579510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105795 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.03.03510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.03.035 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.corsci.2006.10.01310.1016/j.corsci.2006.10.013 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.07.07610.1016/j.msea.2014.07.076 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.06.01810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.06.018 ↗
39. 10.1016/0142-1123(89)90054-610.1016/0142-1123(89)90054-6 ↗
40. 10.1111/ffe.1283210.1111/ffe.12832 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.mtla.2020.10067210.1016/j.mtla.2020.100672 ↗
42. 10.1080/02670836.2017.140755610.1080/02670836.2017.1407556 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.03.02110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.03.021 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.08.00410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.08.004 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10558010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105580 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.05.04710.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.05.047 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.11.00410.1016/j.ijplas.2010.11.004 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.06.07010.1016/j.msea.2013.06.070 ↗