High‐cycle fatigue properties of beta Ti alloy 55Ti–30Nb–10Ta–5Zr, gum metal
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT This paper describes the fatigue properties of the beta titanium alloy 55Ti–30Nb–10Ta–5Zr, generally referred to as ‘Gum Metal’. Rotating bending fatigue tests have been performed in laboratory air and in a 3% NaCl aqueous solution. The results obtained were compared with those of a conventional beta titanium alloy, Ti–22V–4Al. In tensile tests, 55Ti–30Nb–10Ta–5Zr indicated elasticity and microplasticity in the elastic region. Thus, the elastic modulus slightly decreased with an increasing strain, and the work hardening was minimal during plastic deformation. The mechanical properties of both of the alloys were comparable. The fatigue strength of 55Ti–30Nb–10Ta–5Zr in laboratory air was higher than that of Ti–22V–4Al, which could be attributed to the higher fatigue crack initiation resistance of 55Ti–30Nb–10Ta–5Zr than Ti–22V–4Al, while the resistance to small fatigue crack growth was similar. The fatigue strength of 55Ti–30Nb–10Ta–5Zr in laboratory air and in the 3% NaCl aqueous solution was analogous. In addition, corrosion pits were not observed in the run‐out specimen in the 3% NaCl aqueous solution, indicating a high resistance of 55Ti–30Nb–10Ta–5Zr against corrosion fatigue.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Engineering Gifu University 1‐1 Yanagido Gifu 501‐1193 Japan
Department of Mechanical Engineering Toyota National College of Technology 2‐1 Eisei‐cho Toyota 471‐8525 Japan
Department of Mechanical Engineering Gifu University 1‐1 Yanagido Gifu 501‐1193 Japan
Okuma Corporation LTD, 5‐25‐1 Oguchi‐cho 480‐0193 Japan
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1023/A:102288091447310.1023/A:1022880914473 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0921-5093(98)01170-810.1016/S0921-5093(98)01170-8 ↗
3. 10.1016/0921-5093(96)10241-010.1016/0921-5093(96)10241-0 ↗
4. 10.1016/0921-5093(96)10233-110.1016/0921-5093(96)10233-1 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.06.03710.1016/j.actbio.2012.06.037 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.108195710.1126/science.1081957 ↗
7. 10.1007/s11661-006-0037-710.1007/s11661-006-0037-7 ↗
8. 10.2320/matertrans.46.300110.2320/matertrans.46.3001 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.msea.2005.12.08910.1016/j.msea.2005.12.089 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.01.02710.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.01.027 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.01.02710.1016/j.actamat.2006.01.027 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.07.00410.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.07.004 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.02.04410.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.02.044 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.stam.2003.09.00210.1016/j.stam.2003.09.002 ↗
15. Mechanical properties of gum metal and its application for springs
16. Correlation between bond order based on electron theory and active corrosion rate for Ti‐based alloys attacked in HCl solution10.2355/tetsutohagane1955.76.12_2175 ↗
17. Electronic structure and phase stability of titanium alloys10.2355/tetsutohagane1955.72.6_555 ↗
18. Super multifunctional alloy ”GUM METAL”
19. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2007.09.00910.1016/j.ijplas.2007.09.009 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.11.01310.1016/j.actamat.2008.11.013 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.01.03410.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.01.034 ↗
22. 10.1046/j.1460-2695.2000.00325.x10.1046/j.1460-2695.2000.00325.x ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2003.08.02410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2003.08.024 ↗
24. 10.1299/kikaia.53.77910.1299/kikaia.53.779 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.04.07710.1016/j.msea.2012.04.077 ↗
26. The Society of Materials Science Japan(2007)Standard evaluation method of fatigue reliability for metallic materials ‐standard regression method ofS‐Ncurves‐ 4–5.
27. 10.1016/S1003-6326(07)60294-510.1016/S1003-6326(07)60294-5 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.01.01510.1016/j.actamat.2010.01.015 ↗