Water Affinity to Epitaxial Graphene: The Impact of Layer Thickness
Source abstract
Abstract
The sensitivity to water vapour of one‐, two‐, and three‐layer epitaxial graphene (1, 2, and 3LG) is examined in this study. It is unambiguously shown that graphene's response to water, as measured by changes in work function and carrier density, is dependent on its thickness, with 1LG being the most sensitive to water adsorption and environmental concentration changes. This is furthermore substantiated by surface adhesion measurements, which bring evidence that 1LG is less hydrophobic than 2LG. Yet, surprisingly, it is found that other contaminants commonly present in ambient air have a greater impact on graphene response than water vapor alone. This study indicates that graphene sensor design and calibration to minimize or discriminate the effect of the ambient, in which it is intended to operate, are necessary to insure the desired sensitivity and reliability of sensors. The present work will aid in developing models for realistic graphene sensors and establishing protocols for molecular sensor design and development.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Physical Laboratory Teddington TW11 0LW UK
US Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC 20375 USA
Texas A&M University Galveston TX 77553 USA
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nmat196710.1038/nmat1967 ↗
2. 10.1021/nl803363710.1021/nl8033637 ↗
3. 10.1021/nn800593m10.1021/nn800593m ↗
4. 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.10910.1103/RevModPhys.81.109 ↗
5. Here ambient refers to the typical work place or laboratory environment that is the air has not been specially processed or cleaned of impurities. For this study ambient is the untreated air in the laboratory where the samples were investigated.
6. 10.1021/jp208279a10.1021/jp208279a ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.03340410.1103/PhysRevB.80.033404 ↗
8. 10.1039/c1cp20609e10.1039/c1cp20609e ↗
9. 10.1063/1.359840310.1063/1.3598403 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.12.00810.1016/j.carbon.2011.12.008 ↗
11. 10.1002/smll.20100138410.1002/smll.201001384 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.07544210.1103/PhysRevB.78.075442 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.23544010.1103/PhysRevB.79.235440 ↗
14. 10.1038/nphys93510.1038/nphys935 ↗
15. 10.1021/nl900203n10.1021/nl900203n ↗
16. 10.1021/nl903162a10.1021/nl903162a ↗
17. 10.1063/1.472541310.1063/1.4725413 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.12140210.1103/PhysRevB.78.121402 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.303320210.1063/1.3033202 ↗
20. 10.1021/nl800904410.1021/nl8009044 ↗
21. 10.1088/0957-4484/24/21/21570210.1088/0957-4484/24/21/215702 ↗
22. 10.1038/srep0259710.1038/srep02597 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.18740110.1103/PhysRevLett.97.187401 ↗
24. 10.1038/srep1050510.1038/srep10505 ↗
25. 10.1021/nl102960710.1021/nl1029607 ↗
26. 10.1021/nl901572a10.1021/nl901572a ↗
27. 10.1063/1.482664210.1063/1.4826642 ↗
28. 10.1021/nl103015w10.1021/nl103015w ↗
29. 10.3390/cryst301019110.3390/cryst3010191 ↗
30. 10.1021/nl200581g10.1021/nl200581g ↗
31. 10.1063/1.481124810.1063/1.4811248 ↗
32. 10.1002/smll.20140098910.1002/smll.201400989 ↗
33. 10.1021/jp806657k10.1021/jp806657k ↗
34. 10.1063/1.367776910.1063/1.3677769 ↗
35. 10.1002/jrs.248510.1002/jrs.2485 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.36873110.1063/1.368731 ↗
37. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b0322010.1021/acsnano.5b03220 ↗
38. 10.1021/nl080868410.1021/nl0808684 ↗
39. 10.1021/nn303082a10.1021/nn303082a ↗
40. 10.1021/nn501696q10.1021/nn501696q ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.03680310.1103/PhysRevLett.97.036803 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.20680210.1103/PhysRevLett.98.206802 ↗
43. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.12530410.1103/PhysRevB.81.125304 ↗
44. 10.1021/nn403988y10.1021/nn403988y ↗
45. 10.1038/nmat370910.1038/nmat3709 ↗
46. 10.1557/mrs.2012.18010.1557/mrs.2012.180 ↗
47. 10.1038/srep0588110.1038/srep05881 ↗
48. 10.1103/PhysRevB.38.1229010.1103/PhysRevB.38.12290 ↗