journal article·1999-08

Influence of microstructure of (α+β) Ti‐6.2.4.6 alloy on high‐cycle fatigue and tensile test behaviour

G. Jago, J. Bechet

Publisher page

Abstract

Tensile and gigacyclic fatigue behaviour of Ti–6Al–2Sn–4Zr–6Mo alloy were investigated as a function of lamellar primary α‐ and β‐transformed microstructures. Three thermomechanical processes (TP1, TP2, TP3) were selected to produce different combinations of microstructural features on two slightly different compositions of the alloy (A and B). Ultrasonic fatigue tests were performed in air and liquid nitrogen at a frequency of 20 kHz (R = −1, T = 300 and 77 K), giving fatigue tests up to 109 cycles. Microstructural features and the fracture initiation dependence on the primary α lamellar phase were observed by SEM and/or characterized by quantitative image analysis. It has been found that the microstructure of alloy B produced by TP1 represents a better compromise between resistance to initiation and resistance to microcrack growth. Quicker initiation occurs in coarser α‐platelets (TP2, alloy B), and the continuous partially transformed β matrix appears to effectively decrease the tensile and HCF resistance. The bimodal structure (TP3, alloy B) has the best resistance at room temperature, but the presence of a coarse globular phase decreases this fatigue resistance at low temperature.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · Nuclear Materials and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (13)

Show source-provided references
1. GJago JBechet CBathias1995Microstructures/properties relationships in Ti–6.2.4.6. alloy: a microstructural approach of the fatigue damage.Titanium′95: Science and Technology Vol. II The University Press Cambridge 1203–1210
2. 10.1016/0001-6160(76)90147-410.1016/0001-6160(76)90147-4 ↗
3. 10.1016/0013-7944(91)90257-210.1016/0013-7944(91)90257-2 ↗
4. Influence of microstructure and mean stress on fatigue strength of Ti–6Al–4V
5. 10.1007/BF0265663510.1007/BF02656635 ↗
6. Improvements in the fatigue strength of Ti–6Al–4V forgings
7. 10.1007/BF0266336010.1007/BF02663360 ↗
8. ZFan ApMiodownik1991The effect of contiguity on the plane strain fracture toughness of α/β titanium alloys. In:Microstructure/Property Relationships in Titanium Aluminides and Alloys(Edited by Y.‐W. Kim and R. R. Boyer) TMS pp. 623–635.
9. MSugano NTanaka ESakuma TSatake1995A microstructural study of fatigue failure in titanium. In:Titanium′95: Science and Technology Vol. II The University Press Cambridge 1131–1138
10. PjBania PgAllen WmParris1995Development of a near‐alpha alloy with excellent energy related toughness. In:Titanium′95: Science and Technology Vol. II The University Press Cambridge 1419–1426
11. ReSmelser JlSwedlow JcWilliams1978Analysis of local stresses and strains in Ti–6Al–4V widmanstätten α + β microstructures. In:Toughness and Fracture Behavior of Titanium ASTM STP 651 American Society for Testing and Materials Philadelphia USA 200–21510.1520/STP26544S ↗
12. CAngelier JBechet1984Relationship between microstructure and mechanical properties in β‐CEZ titanium alloy. In:Beta Titanium Alloys SF2M Revue de Métallurgie Vol. 8 127–133
13. FhFroes JcChesnutt CgRhodes JcWilliams1978Relationship of fracture toughness and ductility to microstructure and fractographic features in advanced deep hardenable titanium alloys. In:Toughness and Fracture Behavior of Titanium ASTM STP 651 American Society for Testing and Materials Philadelphia USA pp. 115–153.10.1520/STP26541S ↗