Effect of Mesa Sidewall Angle on 4H‐Silicon Carbide Trench Filling Epitaxy Using Trichlorosilane and Hydrogen Chloride
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this report, the advanced manufacturing advantages of using supersaturated chlorinated chemistry are demonstrated at 1550 °C in 4H‐silicon carbide (4H‐SiC) epitaxy on trenches with different geometric profiles. Sloped mesa sidewalls (8°) show improved filling behavior compared with vertical sidewalls (2°) and lower the optimum chlorine/silicon ratio (Si:Cl) required to complete filling. Both the optimum Cl:Si ratio (10) and sidewall angle are lower for wider trench openings, allowing complete fill of 3 µm wide trenches (8 µm pitch, 5 µm depth) at a filling rate of 19 µm h−1. Excessive hydrogen chloride (HCl) diminishes filling by reducing sidewall growth and can also produce an end surface with very rough topography. This work demonstrates the importance of trench geometry on both the filling behavior and process optimization in chlorinated trench filling epitaxy for the manufacture of 4H‐SiC superjunction power electronics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · Copper Interconnects and Reliability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Engineering University of Warwick Coventry CV4 7AL UK
Oxford Instruments Plasma Technology Bristol BS35 4GG UK
Funding
HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme · Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.4028/p-6zcw3b10.4028/p-6zcw3b ↗
2. 10.1109/JPROC.2017.268770110.1109/JPROC.2017.2687701 ↗
3. 10.2183/pjab.98.01110.2183/pjab.98.011 ↗
4. Lorenz L. · 2000 · 2974
5. 10.1016/j.mssp.2024.10832410.1016/j.mssp.2024.108324 ↗
6. S.Harada Y.Kobayashi S.Kyogoku T.Morimoto T.Tanaka M.Takei H.Okumura IEEE Int. Electron Devices Meet IEEE San Francisco CA USA December2018.
7. 10.1134/S106378262213002410.1134/S1063782622130024 ↗
8. 10.1109/TED.2017.265834410.1109/TED.2017.2658344 ↗
9. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.897.4310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.897.43 ↗
10. 10.1109/TED.2022.315246010.1109/TED.2022.3152460 ↗
11. Sometani M. · 2022 · 337
12. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.740-742.78510.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.740-742.785 ↗
13. 10.7567/JJAP.55.01AC0410.7567/JJAP.55.01AC04 ↗
14. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.858.18110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.858.181 ↗
15. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.963.13110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.963.131 ↗
16. K.Mochizuki S.Ji R.Kosugi Y.Yonezawa H.Okumura IEEE Int. Electron Devices Meeting IEEE San Francisco CA USA December2017.
17. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b1075110.1021/acs.jpcc.7b10751 ↗
18. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.924.10010.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.924.100 ↗
19. 10.1149/2162-8777/abbf2e10.1149/2162-8777/abbf2e ↗
20. 10.7567/APEX.8.06550210.7567/APEX.8.065502 ↗
21. S.Yamauchi T.Shibata S.Nogami T.Yamaoka Y.Hattori H.Yamaguchi IEEE Proc. Int. Symp. Power Semicond. Devices ICs IEEE Naples Italy June2006 pp.1–4.
22. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2020.12580910.1016/j.jcrysgro.2020.125809 ↗
23. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.924.11610.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.924.116 ↗
24. 10.7567/APEX.10.05550510.7567/APEX.10.055505 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2023.12710410.1016/j.jcrysgro.2023.127104 ↗
26. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.963.13610.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.963.136 ↗
27. Mochizuki K. · 2018 · 331
28. 10.1063/5.021068010.1063/5.0210680 ↗
29. 10.7567/JJAP.56.07030710.7567/JJAP.56.070307 ↗
30. 10.7567/JJAP.56.04CR0510.7567/JJAP.56.04CR05 ↗