journal article·2024-03Open access

Impact of Twin's Landscape on the Magnetic Damping of La2/3Sr1/3MnO3 Thin Films

Shoulong Chen, Alberto Pomar, Lluis Balcells, Carlos Frontera, Narcís Mestres, Benjamín Martínez

Advanced Materials Interfaces· Volume 11· Issue 7

Abstract

Abstract Understanding the origin and mechanisms of magnetic damping in complex oxide materials is crucial for optimizing spin dynamics and tailoring their properties for specific spintronic applications. Ferromagnetic resonance spectroscopy (FMR) technique has been used to investigate the magnetic damping of multiple La2/3Sr1/3MnO3 (LSMO) epitaxial thin films with similar thickness and identical DC magnetic properties. However, the dynamic magnetic properties exhibit noticeable variations among samples. Microstructural analyses using X‐ray diffraction (XRD) and atomic force microscopy (AFM), confirm that the samples are structurally identical, except for minute differences in the miscut angles of the substrates. Nevertheless, when examining the samples using backscattered electron (BSE) images in scanning electron microscopy (SEM), significant disparities in the twin distribution are observed. These variations in the twin distribution directly correlate with the observed differences in the damping values. A careful image analysis of BSE images allows to demonstrate that the increase of damping is due to the pinning of the magnetization in the twin boundaries.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Advanced Condensed Matter Physics · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Barcelona ICMAB‐CSIC Campus Universitario UAB Bellaterra 08193 Spain

Funding

China Scholarship Council · Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-070909-10412310.1146/annurev-conmatphys-070909-104123 ↗
2. 10.1103/RevModPhys.76.32310.1103/RevModPhys.76.323 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.06660310.1103/PhysRevLett.107.066603 ↗
4. 10.1038/nphys377010.1038/nphys3770 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.02720410.1103/PhysRevLett.99.027204 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.06660410.1103/PhysRevLett.107.066604 ↗
7. 10.1038/srep2082710.1038/srep20827 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.306760710.1063/1.3067607 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.480295210.1063/1.4802952 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.mser.2010.03.00110.1016/j.mser.2010.03.001 ↗
11. 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-062910-14044510.1146/annurev-conmatphys-062910-140445 ↗
12. 10.1038/3388310.1038/33883 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.315726710.1063/1.3157267 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.495097110.1063/1.4950971 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.486348510.1063/1.4863485 ↗
16. Haspot V. · Phys. Rev. · 2022 · 6
17. 10.1038/srep2872710.1038/srep28727 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.497843110.1063/1.4978431 ↗
19. 10.1109/TMAG.2004.83674010.1109/TMAG.2004.836740 ↗
20. 10.1139/p70-36110.1139/p70-361 ↗
21. 10.1007/BF0158762110.1007/BF01587621 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.283234810.1063/1.2832348 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.10720610.1103/PhysRevLett.110.107206 ↗
24. 10.1088/0022-3727/49/31/31500110.1088/0022-3727/49/31/315001 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.09610110.1103/PhysRevLett.98.096101 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.214919010.1063/1.2149190 ↗
27. 10.1088/0034-4885/61/7/00110.1088/0034-4885/61/7/001 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.36757010.1063/1.367570 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.36470810.1063/1.364708 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.06410110.1103/PhysRevB.83.064101 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.12481710.1063/1.124817 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.07511110.1103/PhysRevB.92.075111 ↗
33. 10.1039/c3ce40085a10.1039/c3ce40085a ↗
34. 10.1134/1.56738210.1134/1.567382 ↗