journal article·2020-03

The Surface Plasmon Performance of β‐Sn/RGO Hybrid Nanostructure

Han‐Han Wu, Zi‐Heng Li, Peng Da, Sheng Cheng, Pai‐Feng Luo, Hong‐Hai Zhong, Ying‐Wei Lu

Advanced Materials Interfaces· Volume 7· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract A hybrid nanostructure composing of β‐Sn nanoparticles and reduced graphene oxide (RGO) nanosheets is successfully prepared through an effective and low‐cost solvothermal method. Both optical absorption measurements and finite element simulations confirm that the dominating plasmonic resonance frequency of such hybrid nanostructure is tunable in ultraviolet region and the near‐field enhancement effect can be achieved under broadband excitations ranging from ultraviolet to visible, which can be attributed to the coupling between β‐Sn and RGO. In addition, surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) determinations and corresponding calculations confirm that such all‐IV hybrid nanostructure can serve as an SERS platform and can be an alternative candidate for other plasmonic applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications · Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Materials Science and Engineering Hefei University of Technology Hefei 230009 P. R. China

Instrumental Analysis Center Hefei University of Technology Hefei 230009 P. R. China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adom.20180056410.1002/adom.201800564 ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0034110.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00341 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0024310.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00243 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20120507610.1002/adma.201205076 ↗
5. 10.1039/C3CP43856B10.1039/C3CP43856B ↗
6. 10.1038/nmat262910.1038/nmat2629 ↗
7. 10.1002/adom.20180053710.1002/adom.201800537 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0439310.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04393 ↗
9. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.26210.1038/nphoton.2012.262 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b1085110.1021/acs.jpcc.8b10851 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.11340510.1103/PhysRevB.84.113405 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.apmt.2018.12.02010.1016/j.apmt.2018.12.020 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.05.28810.1016/j.jallcom.2019.05.288 ↗
14. 10.1021/nn406105n10.1021/nn406105n ↗
15. 10.1039/b914650d10.1039/b914650d ↗
16. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.07.04110.1016/j.apsusc.2014.07.041 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.05.05110.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.05.051 ↗
18. 10.1039/c1jm11159k10.1039/c1jm11159k ↗
19. 10.1063/1.494685810.1063/1.4946858 ↗
20. 10.1039/c1cc11125f10.1039/c1cc11125f ↗
21. 10.1021/jp811377n10.1021/jp811377n ↗
22. 10.1016/j.carbon.2007.02.03410.1016/j.carbon.2007.02.034 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.03.04510.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.03.045 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.07.14410.1016/j.matlet.2015.07.144 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jiec.2012.12.02910.1016/j.jiec.2012.12.029 ↗
26. 10.1021/j100079a00810.1021/j100079a008 ↗
27. 10.1021/jp068790810.1021/jp0687908 ↗
28. 10.1002/anie.20050441910.1002/anie.200504419 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.32619910.1063/1.326199 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.02.05010.1016/j.carbon.2016.02.050 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.02.05110.1016/j.jcis.2012.02.051 ↗
32. 10.1039/C5CP07185B10.1039/C5CP07185B ↗