Inhomogeneity of Cleaved Bulk MoS2 and Compensation of Its Charge Imbalances by Room‐Temperature Hydrogen Treatment
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Synthetic single crystals of bulk molybdenum disulphide cleaved in ultrahigh vacuum are mapped across a large (≈25 mm2) area by X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy, both statically and transiently following above‐bandgap excitation by an ultrafast laser. This work finds that: I) A cleaved surface typically displays spatially inhomogeneous properties, manifested by large (≈1 eV) variations in binding energy and band bending and variable degrees of stability of those over time as a result of variable gas uptakes from the residual atmosphere. II) Moderate (350 °C) annealing and exposure to molecular hydrogen can be cycled to switch between smaller and larger surface band bending, the switch being reversible but strongly sample‐position dependent. III) Upon exposure to atomic hydrogen, the binding energy of the entire surface levels out to a common (within <0.05 eV) value corresponding to a Fermi level pinned close to mid‐bandgap. Such remarkable effect is attributed to the ability of hydrogen atoms to serve as donors and acceptors alike, thus neutralizing local charge imbalances inevitably present at the surface in consequence of intrinsic and/or cleavage‐induced defects. With subsequent moderate annealing, the hydrogenated surface preserves a fairly homogenous electronic state which is however characterized by a lower binding energy and little to no band bending.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute Methods and Instrumentation for Synchrotron Radiation Research Helmholtz‐Zentrum Berlin Albert‐Einstein‐Straße 15 12489 Berlin Germany
Institute of Physics and Astronomy University of Potsdam Karl‐Liebknecht‐Straße 24/25 14476 Potsdam‐Golm Germany
Division of X‐ray Photon Science Department of Physics and Astronomy Uppsala University P.O. Box 516 Uppsala 751 20 Sweden
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C4RA11852A10.1039/C4RA11852A ↗
2. 10.1021/am509096x10.1021/am509096x ↗
3. 10.1088/0953-8984/24/30/30550210.1088/0953-8984/24/30/305502 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.susc.2006.08.03810.1016/j.susc.2006.08.038 ↗
5. 10.1021/nn500044q10.1021/nn500044q ↗
6. 10.1016/j.cplett.2013.10.03410.1016/j.cplett.2013.10.034 ↗
7. 10.1039/C9CP07004D10.1039/C9CP07004D ↗
8. 10.1016/0039-6028(89)90726-710.1016/0039-6028(89)90726-7 ↗
9. 10.1016/0039-6028(95)00544-710.1016/0039-6028(95)00544-7 ↗
10. 10.1021/acssensors.8b0107710.1021/acssensors.8b01077 ↗
11. Zhang H. · J. Mater. · 2018 · 4 · 95
12. 10.1186/1556-276X-8-42510.1186/1556-276X-8-425 ↗
13. 10.1039/C6CP01362G10.1039/C6CP01362G ↗
14. 10.1063/1.369604510.1063/1.3696045 ↗
15. 10.1021/nl401117210.1021/nl4011172 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41467-019-10526-010.1038/s41467-019-10526-0 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.chempr.2016.10.00710.1016/j.chempr.2016.10.007 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.cattod.2005.04.00210.1016/j.cattod.2005.04.002 ↗
19. 10.1039/c3ra42072h10.1039/c3ra42072h ↗
20. 10.1016/j.mee.2018.01.01210.1016/j.mee.2018.01.012 ↗
21. 10.1088/1361-648X/aaa03f10.1088/1361-648X/aaa03f ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.07.06910.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.07.069 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.08542610.1103/PhysRevB.94.085426 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.chemphys.2014.02.01410.1016/j.chemphys.2014.02.014 ↗
25. 10.1039/C3NR05218D10.1039/C3NR05218D ↗
26. 10.1063/1.495543010.1063/1.4955430 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0766110.1021/acsnano.6b07661 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.24130310.1103/PhysRevB.92.241303 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41598-017-07178-910.1038/s41598-017-07178-9 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.elspec.2017.05.01110.1016/j.elspec.2017.05.011 ↗
31. 10.1021/j100393a01010.1021/j100393a010 ↗
32. 10.1021/nl501659n10.1021/nl501659n ↗
33. 10.1021/cr300062610.1021/cr3000626 ↗
34. When not differently specified it is implied that the measurements were taken with laser OFF.
35. Those regions will be henceforth referred to as uncleaved meaning that they did not undergo proper UHV cleaving however they have been cleaved previously in air. Correspondingly well‐cleaved positions will be simply referred to as cleaved.
36. 10.1380/ejssnt.2017.11510.1380/ejssnt.2017.115 ↗
37. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0330910.1021/acsnano.5b03309 ↗
38. 10.1063/1.492320210.1063/1.4923202 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0174210.1021/acsnano.6b01742 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.478936510.1063/1.4789365 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.08400210.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.084002 ↗
42. 10.1038/s42005-019-0212-y10.1038/s42005-019-0212-y ↗
43. The valence band maximum is estimated as the very onset of the energy distribution curve at the Γ point which is identifiable with an accuracy better than 0.25 eV due to the leading edge of such curve being very steep.
44. The experimental uncertainty on the XPS signal intensities is dictated by the possible long‐term flux instability of the X‐ray beamline and the possible irreproducibility of the sample positioning with respect to the manipulator coordinates upon transfer of the sample from the measurement chamber to the preparation chamber and back to the measurement chamber.
45. 10.1039/C8CP02365D10.1039/C8CP02365D ↗
46. 10.1007/978-3-642-84778-310.1007/978-3-642-84778-3 ↗
47. 10.1038/nature0166510.1038/nature01665 ↗
48. 10.1063/1.36959010.1063/1.369590 ↗
49. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0071010.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00710 ↗
50. 10.1038/ncomms629010.1038/ncomms6290 ↗
51. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0517310.1021/acsnano.5b05173 ↗
52. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.07740210.1103/PhysRevLett.119.077402 ↗
53. 10.1088/2053-1583/ab33ab10.1088/2053-1583/ab33ab ↗
54. 10.1063/1.503073710.1063/1.5030737 ↗
55. 10.1126/science.aad211410.1126/science.aad2114 ↗
56. 10.1016/0039-6028(90)90508-610.1016/0039-6028(90)90508-6 ↗
57. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b0205710.1021/acs.langmuir.5b02057 ↗