Characteristics of Highly Area‐Mismatched Graphene‐to‐Substrate Transfers and the Predictability of Wrinkle Formation in Graphene for Stretchable Electronics
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The indirect‐transfer process is the primary technique used to fabricate graphene electrodes on an arbitrary substrate. The area mismatch between the initial graphene‐Cu substrate and the transfer substrate causes irregularities in the transferred graphene film; wrinkles are one of the primary results. In this paper, it is found that nanoscale surface roughness (wavelength below 500 nm) in the graphene‐Cu 3D substrate (with up to a 4 µm cavity) results in amplified wrinkles (amplitude over 24.4 nm) or newly generated wrinkles (low‐amplitude corrugations) that depend on the corrugation amplitude. Further, a deep‐cavity graphene‐Cu structure (≈20 µm) causes predictable formation of wrinkles in terms of direction and position. The direction of the wrinkle is decided by the true area difference, which creates a strain difference in two perpendicular directions. For unidirectional wrinkles, the position is decided by the strain‐gradient difference. The understanding of highly area‐mismatched transfers facilitates the fabrication of predictable well‐defined wrinkles on an arbitrary substrate. Wrinkled graphene shows better electrical properties (≈1 kΩ between contacts) under strained conditions than regular graphene film.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Graphene research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Printed Electronics Engineering Sunchon National University Jeonnam Suncheon 57922 South Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea · Ministry of Education
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Moreno‐Bárcenas A. · J. Nanomater. · 2018 · 2018 · 345726310.1155/2018/3457263 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.475198210.1063/1.4751982 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41467-019-08813-x10.1038/s41467-019-08813-x ↗
4. 10.1186/s11671-018-2740-x10.1186/s11671-018-2740-x ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.09.27210.1016/j.jallcom.2018.09.272 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.cap.2019.09.00510.1016/j.cap.2019.09.005 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matlet.2018.10.13410.1016/j.matlet.2018.10.134 ↗
8. 10.1039/C9NR01011D10.1039/C9NR01011D ↗
9. Lee J. · J. Nanomater. · 2018 · 2018 · 7610409
10. 10.1038/s41598-016-0028-x10.1038/s41598-016-0028-x ↗
11. 10.1002/sia.642310.1002/sia.6423 ↗
12. 10.1007/s12274-011-0156-310.1007/s12274-011-0156-3 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.343764210.1063/1.3437642 ↗
14. Ko P. J. · J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. · 2013 · 433 · 012002
15. 10.1016/j.mattod.2015.10.00210.1016/j.mattod.2015.10.002 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41598-019-46978-z10.1038/s41598-019-46978-z ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20150424510.1002/adma.201504245 ↗
18. 10.1039/c2nr30994g10.1039/c2nr30994g ↗
19. 10.1126/sciadv.170015910.1126/sciadv.1700159 ↗
20. 10.1021/nn405939w10.1021/nn405939w ↗
21. 10.1021/nl401070p10.1021/nl401070p ↗
22. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.07.00410.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.07.004 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.mattod.2015.01.01710.1016/j.mattod.2015.01.017 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.09.03510.1016/j.carbon.2019.09.035 ↗
25. 10.1021/nn203775x10.1021/nn203775x ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.20543310.1103/PhysRevB.79.205433 ↗
27. Mueller N. S. · 2D Mater. · 2018 · 5 · 01016
28. 10.1088/2053-1583/aa90b310.1088/2053-1583/aa90b3 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jmps.2019.10369710.1016/j.jmps.2019.103697 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.11.05910.1016/j.carbon.2018.11.059 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0619610.1021/acsnano.7b06196 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.18610410.1103/PhysRevLett.120.186104 ↗