journal article·2021-06Open access

Highly Scalable Conversion of Blood Protoporphyrin to Efficient Electrocatalyst for CO2‐to‐CO Conversion

Matteo Miola, Simin Li, Xin‐Ming Hu, Marcel Ceccato, Annette‐E. Surkus, Edmund Welter, Steen U. Pedersen, Henrik Junge, Troels Skrydstrup, Matthias Beller, Kim Daasbjerg

Advanced Materials Interfaces· Volume 8· Issue 12

Abstract

Abstract Electrochemical CO2 reduction to valuable chemicals represents a green and sustainable approach to close the anthropogenic carbon cycle, but has been impeded by low efficiency and high cost of electrocatalysts. Here, a cost‐effective hybrid catalyst consisting of hemin (chloroprotoporphyrin IX iron(III)), a product recovered from bovine blood, adsorbed onto commercial Vulcan carbon is reported. Upon heat treatment, this material shows significantly improved activity and selectivity for CO2 reduction in water while exhibiting good stability for more than 10 h. The heat treatment leads to consecutive removal of the axial chlorine atom and decomposition of the iron porphyrin ring, restructuring to form atomic Fe sites. The optimized hybrid catalyst obtained at 900 °C shows near‐unity selectivity for reduction of CO2 to CO at a small overpotential of 310 mV. The insight into transformation of adsorbed Fe complexes into single Fe atoms upon heat treatment provides guidance for development of single atom catalysts.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Ionic liquids properties and applications · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Chemical Engineering Group Engineering and Technology Institute Groningen University of Groningen Nijenborgh 4 Groningen AG 9747 The Netherlands

Department of Chemistry Aarhus University Langelandsgade 140 Aarhus 8000 Denmark

Environment Research Institute Shandong University Binhai Road 72 Qingdao 266237 China

Leibniz‐Institut für Katalyse Albert‐Einstein‐Straße 29a Rostock 18059 Germany

Deutsches Elektronen‐Synchrotron A Research Centre of the Helmholtz Association Notkestraße 85 Hamburg D‐22607 Germany

Carbon Dioxide Activation Center (CADIAC) Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO) Aarhus University Gustav Wields Vej 14 Aarhus 8000 Denmark

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/jz101262710.1021/jz1012627 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41560-019-0450-y10.1038/s41560-019-0450-y ↗
3. 10.1038/s41929-019-0306-710.1038/s41929-019-0306-7 ↗
4. 10.1039/B804323J10.1039/B804323J ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0045910.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00459 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41929-018-0051-310.1038/s41929-018-0051-3 ↗
7. 10.1002/aenm.20170361410.1002/aenm.201703614 ↗
8. 10.1021/jacs.5b1308010.1021/jacs.5b13080 ↗
9. 10.1039/C6CC05430G10.1039/C6CC05430G ↗
10. 10.1038/ncomms1467510.1038/ncomms14675 ↗
11. 10.1002/anie.20170110410.1002/anie.201701104 ↗
12. 10.1002/anie.20180279210.1002/anie.201802792 ↗
13. 10.1002/anie.20190647510.1002/anie.201906475 ↗
14. 10.1021/acscatal.8b0106810.1021/acscatal.8b01068 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41467-019-11542-w10.1038/s41467-019-11542-w ↗
16. 10.1002/anie.20170386410.1002/anie.201703864 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.06.01910.1016/j.joule.2018.06.019 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41467-017-01035-z10.1038/s41467-017-01035-z ↗
19. 10.1021/acscatal.9b0161710.1021/acscatal.9b01617 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41560-017-0078-810.1038/s41560-017-0078-8 ↗
21. 10.1002/anie.20180546710.1002/anie.201805467 ↗
22. 10.1039/D0RA08223F10.1039/D0RA08223F ↗
23. 10.1002/smsc.20200002810.1002/smsc.202000028 ↗
24. 10.1021/acscatal.8b0102210.1021/acscatal.8b01022 ↗
25. 10.1002/smtd.20180044010.1002/smtd.201800440 ↗
26. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a12784710.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a127847 ↗
27. 10.1021/ja051151a10.1021/ja051151a ↗
28. 10.1021/jp111233410.1021/jp1112334 ↗
29. 10.1007/s11426-010-4084-y10.1007/s11426-010-4084-y ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2003.09.00710.1016/j.jelechem.2003.09.007 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.estlett.7b0005910.1021/acs.estlett.7b00059 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2005.06.01110.1016/j.jelechem.2005.06.011 ↗
33. 10.1002/anie.20190607910.1002/anie.201906079 ↗
34. 10.1021/acscatal.5b0176710.1021/acscatal.5b01767 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.10.00110.1016/j.carbpol.2018.10.001 ↗
36. 10.1021/jacs.5b1265210.1021/jacs.5b12652 ↗
37. 10.1002/adfm.20160435610.1002/adfm.201604356 ↗
38. 10.1016/0001-6160(73)90012-610.1016/0001-6160(73)90012-6 ↗
39. 10.1021/jacs.6b0075710.1021/jacs.6b00757 ↗
40. 10.1021/acscatal.6b0335310.1021/acscatal.6b03353 ↗
41. 10.1021/jacs.5b0567410.1021/jacs.5b05674 ↗
42. 10.1002/cssc.20200131110.1002/cssc.202001311 ↗
43. 10.1107/S090904950501271910.1107/S0909049505012719 ↗
44. FAO stat livestock primary http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QL(accessed: May2018).
45. a)FAO: “FAO Cattle Weights”2015 http://www.fao.org/faostat(accessed: May 2018);
46. b)R.Schulte P.McKiernan L.Desai F.Mitloehner Environmental Performance of Pig Supply Chains Guidelines for Assessment FAO2018 pp.16–26.
47. 10.1002/978047075107710.1002/9780470751077 ↗
48. 10.1152/ajplegacy.1953.173.3.42110.1152/ajplegacy.1953.173.3.421 ↗
49. 10.1002/jssc.20150040810.1002/jssc.201500408 ↗
50. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a12784710.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a127847 ↗