Organothiol‐Based Hybrid‐Layer Strategy for High‐Performance Copper Adhesion and Stress‐Migration via Simultaneous Oxide Reduction
Source abstract
Abstract
The presence of defective native copper‐oxide (CuxO) remains a challenge for device technologies owing to its detrimental effects on the adhesion, moisture sensitivity and stress‐migration. Here we demonstrate a rapid, single‐step, and organic‐solvent‐free sol‐gel deposition process that is capable of simultaneously reducing the weak native Cu‐oxide while forming a densely connected Cu/hybrid interface. A marked 9‐fold improvement in adhesion is reported, along with a substantial decrease in the Cu stress‐migration rate during in‐situ isothermal stress‐relaxation experiments. The enhanced Cu/hybrid interface adhesion and the improved Cu stress‐migration performance were attributed to the partial reduction of the ~2 nm native Cu2O layer as demonstrated via atomic‐resolution transmission electron microscopy. The hybrid‐layer strategy we developed is expected to be effective in not only being a strong candidate for adhesion improvement to Cu, but in promoting Cu stress‐ and the related electro‐migration performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Copper Interconnects and Reliability · Semiconductor materials and devices · Electrodeposition and Electroless Coatings
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering Stanford University Stanford CA 94305 USA
Funding
Semiconductor Research Corporation
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1023/A:102001262514910.1023/A:1020012625149 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.microrel.2011.12.02410.1016/j.microrel.2011.12.024 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.09.10010.1016/j.tsf.2005.09.100 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.12.14610.1016/j.electacta.2013.12.146 ↗
5. Wong C. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 1
6. 10.1002/adfm.20090207210.1002/adfm.200902072 ↗
7. 10.1038/nature0582610.1038/nature05826 ↗
8. 10.1002/cphc.20060057310.1002/cphc.200600573 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.mssp.2004.06.00510.1016/j.mssp.2004.06.005 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.355162710.1063/1.3551627 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.353139310.1063/1.3531393 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.182937210.1063/1.1829372 ↗
13. 10.1557/JMR.1998.018610.1557/JMR.1998.0186 ↗
14. 10.1557/jmr.2006.019610.1557/jmr.2006.0196 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.150449110.1063/1.1504491 ↗
16. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.22910.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.229 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.12397410.1063/1.123974 ↗
18. 10.1016/0040-6090(94)05806-710.1016/0040-6090(94)05806-7 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.153294210.1063/1.1532942 ↗
20. 10.1038/nmat103710.1038/nmat1037 ↗
21. 10.1021/la960465w10.1021/la960465w ↗
22. 10.1021/la025661j10.1021/la025661j ↗
23. 10.5012/bkcs.2003.24.5.61010.5012/bkcs.2003.24.5.610 ↗
24. 10.1021/ja00019a01110.1021/ja00019a011 ↗
25. Kabekkodu S. · 2013
26. 10.1063/1.264456910.1063/1.2644569 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.12.15910.1016/j.tsf.2007.12.159 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.tsf.2008.03.03010.1016/j.tsf.2008.03.030 ↗
29. 10.1557/JMR.1993.184510.1557/JMR.1993.1845 ↗
30. 10.1557/JMR.1998.027210.1557/JMR.1998.0272 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.164463410.1063/1.1644634 ↗
32. 10.1557/JMR.2000.039510.1557/JMR.2000.0395 ↗
33. 10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00387-510.1016/S1359-6454(98)00387-5 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.184585710.1063/1.1845857 ↗
35. 10.1201/9781420007282.ch2110.1201/9781420007282.ch21 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2009.09.00410.1016/j.porgcoat.2009.09.004 ↗
37. 10.1007/s10971-015-3891-110.1007/s10971-015-3891-1 ↗
38. 10.1016/S0013-7944(98)00052-610.1016/S0013-7944(98)00052-6 ↗
39. 10.1098/rspa.1909.002110.1098/rspa.1909.0021 ↗
40. Gan D. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 97 · 110.1007/10828028_1 ↗