journal article·2016-07

Organothiol‐Based Hybrid‐Layer Strategy for High‐Performance Copper Adhesion and Stress‐Migration via Simultaneous Oxide Reduction

Qiran Xiao, Brian L. Watson, Reinhold H. Dauskardt

Advanced Materials Interfaces· Volume 3· Issue 14
Publisher page

Abstract

The presence of defective native copper‐oxide (CuxO) remains a challenge for device technologies owing to its detrimental effects on the adhesion, moisture sensitivity and stress‐migration. Here we demonstrate a rapid, single‐step, and organic‐solvent‐free sol‐gel deposition process that is capable of simultaneously reducing the weak native Cu‐oxide while forming a densely connected Cu/hybrid interface. A marked 9‐fold improvement in adhesion is reported, along with a substantial decrease in the Cu stress‐migration rate during in‐situ isothermal stress‐relaxation experiments. The enhanced Cu/hybrid interface adhesion and the improved Cu stress‐migration performance were attributed to the partial reduction of the ~2 nm native Cu2O layer as demonstrated via atomic‐resolution transmission electron microscopy. The hybrid‐layer strategy we developed is expected to be effective in not only being a strong candidate for adhesion improvement to Cu, but in promoting Cu stress‐ and the related electro‐migration performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Copper Interconnects and Reliability · Semiconductor materials and devices · Electrodeposition and Electroless Coatings

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering Stanford University Stanford CA 94305 USA

Funding

Semiconductor Research Corporation

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1023/A:102001262514910.1023/A:1020012625149 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.microrel.2011.12.02410.1016/j.microrel.2011.12.024 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.09.10010.1016/j.tsf.2005.09.100 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.12.14610.1016/j.electacta.2013.12.146 ↗
5. Wong C. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 1
6. 10.1002/adfm.20090207210.1002/adfm.200902072 ↗
7. 10.1038/nature0582610.1038/nature05826 ↗
8. 10.1002/cphc.20060057310.1002/cphc.200600573 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.mssp.2004.06.00510.1016/j.mssp.2004.06.005 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.355162710.1063/1.3551627 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.353139310.1063/1.3531393 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.182937210.1063/1.1829372 ↗
13. 10.1557/JMR.1998.018610.1557/JMR.1998.0186 ↗
14. 10.1557/jmr.2006.019610.1557/jmr.2006.0196 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.150449110.1063/1.1504491 ↗
16. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.22910.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.229 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.12397410.1063/1.123974 ↗
18. 10.1016/0040-6090(94)05806-710.1016/0040-6090(94)05806-7 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.153294210.1063/1.1532942 ↗
20. 10.1038/nmat103710.1038/nmat1037 ↗
21. 10.1021/la960465w10.1021/la960465w ↗
22. 10.1021/la025661j10.1021/la025661j ↗
23. 10.5012/bkcs.2003.24.5.61010.5012/bkcs.2003.24.5.610 ↗
24. 10.1021/ja00019a01110.1021/ja00019a011 ↗
25. Kabekkodu S. · 2013
26. 10.1063/1.264456910.1063/1.2644569 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.12.15910.1016/j.tsf.2007.12.159 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.tsf.2008.03.03010.1016/j.tsf.2008.03.030 ↗
29. 10.1557/JMR.1993.184510.1557/JMR.1993.1845 ↗
30. 10.1557/JMR.1998.027210.1557/JMR.1998.0272 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.164463410.1063/1.1644634 ↗
32. 10.1557/JMR.2000.039510.1557/JMR.2000.0395 ↗
33. 10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00387-510.1016/S1359-6454(98)00387-5 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.184585710.1063/1.1845857 ↗
35. 10.1201/9781420007282.ch2110.1201/9781420007282.ch21 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2009.09.00410.1016/j.porgcoat.2009.09.004 ↗
37. 10.1007/s10971-015-3891-110.1007/s10971-015-3891-1 ↗
38. 10.1016/S0013-7944(98)00052-610.1016/S0013-7944(98)00052-6 ↗
39. 10.1098/rspa.1909.002110.1098/rspa.1909.0021 ↗
40. Gan D. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 97 · 110.1007/10828028_1 ↗