Tracking UV Degradation of Inkjet Prints Using ToF‐SIMS and Machine Learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Inkjet printing is widely deployed in a variety of commercial and consumer contexts and is an excellent reference system for exploring complex and subtle changes that occur in response to ageing and environmental exposure. This study describes a robust and unbiased assessment of changes in inkjet ink chemistry in response to real‐world environmental exposure (sunlight and ambient heat). Over a period of 21 weeks, commercial inks are exposed to solar UV light and monitored for chemical changes via time‐of‐flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF‐SIMS). Self‐organizing map with relational perspective mapping (SOM‐RPM), hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA), and partial least squares (PLS) regression are used to analyze the ToF‐SIMS data and elucidate chemical changes both spectrally and spatially over time. Ultraviolet (UV) light is found to cause significant changes to ink chemistry. Each of the inks (black, cyan, magenta and yellow) react in a unique manner, with the black and yellow inks being most affected. This study exemplifies how machine learning can pinpoint subtle changes in hyperspectral data and provide insight into the long‐term thermal and UV degradation of inkjet inks.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies · Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis · Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Centre for Materials and Surface Science and Department of Mathematical and Physical Sciences La Trobe University Bundoora VIC 3086 Australia
La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science La Trobe University Bundoora VIC 3086 Australia
Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences Monash University Parkville VIC 3052 Australia
School of Pharmacy University of Nottingham Nottingham NG7 2RD UK
CSIRO Manufacturing Clayton VIC 3168 Australia
Funding
Australian National Fabrication Facility · Office of National Intelligence
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.2352/J.ImagingSci.Technol.1998.42.1.art0000710.2352/J.ImagingSci.Technol.1998.42.1.art00007 ↗
2. “Technical Brief—DURABrite® Ink ” Epson America Inc https://www.epson.com.au/downloads/pdf/duratech.pdf (accessed: April 2023).
3. Leach C. A. R. H. · 2012
4. 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01244.x10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01244.x ↗
5. 10.1016/j.talanta.2014.04.00410.1016/j.talanta.2014.04.004 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.microc.2023.10925010.1016/j.microc.2023.109250 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.11056210.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110562 ↗
8. 10.2320/matertrans.45.179410.2320/matertrans.45.1794 ↗
9. 10.2352/ISSN.2169‐4451.1998.14.1.art00024_110.2352/ISSN.2169‐4451.1998.14.1.art00024_1 ↗
10. R.Simmons A&C Black 3PL 2002.10.21000/JASMR02010527 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.chemolab.2020.10418710.1016/j.chemolab.2020.104187 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.12.00110.1016/j.forsciint.2011.12.001 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.scijus.2020.01.00410.1016/j.scijus.2020.01.004 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.10030010.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100300 ↗
15. 10.1080/07853890.2018.156274910.1080/07853890.2018.1562749 ↗
16. 10.1080/07853890.2018.156275010.1080/07853890.2018.1562750 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.11234710.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112347 ↗
18. 10.1111/1556-4029.1304710.1111/1556-4029.13047 ↗
19. 10.1017/S143192761005994510.1017/S1431927610059945 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.08.02010.1016/j.forsciint.2009.08.020 ↗
21. 10.1002/smtd.20230123010.1002/smtd.202301230 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b0305810.1021/acs.analchem.9b03058 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b0341110.1021/acs.analchem.6b03411 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.forc.2020.10029810.1016/j.forc.2020.100298 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.microc.2024.11004110.1016/j.microc.2024.110041 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.12116710.1016/j.eswa.2023.121167 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.11086910.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110869 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.scijus.2024.03.00110.1016/j.scijus.2024.03.001 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.infrared.2022.10435710.1016/j.infrared.2022.104357 ↗
30. 10.1021/jasms.4c0031810.1021/jasms.4c00318 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c0098610.1021/acs.analchem.0c00986 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b0332210.1021/acs.analchem.9b03322 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.chemolab.2009.05.00710.1016/j.chemolab.2009.05.007 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.chemolab.2012.07.00510.1016/j.chemolab.2012.07.005 ↗
35. 10.2466/pr0.1966.18.3.85110.2466/pr0.1966.18.3.851 ↗
36. 10.1002/admi.20230064510.1002/admi.202300645 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c0076910.1021/acs.analchem.3c00769 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.analchem.5c0273710.1021/acs.analchem.5c02737 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2006.06.03810.1016/j.dyepig.2006.06.038 ↗
40. D.Myers “The Color of Art Pigment Database” https://www.artiscreation.com/(accessed: 2025).
41. 10.1016/j.btre.2019.e0039910.1016/j.btre.2019.e00399 ↗