Impact of Static Electric Field on Dielectrophoretic Alignment of Silicon Nanowires
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Among numerous approaches to assembling nanowires onto electrodes, dielectrophoresis (DEP) is a potential candidate to place the nanowires. However, its yield is still far from perfection, urging fundamental understanding of its dynamics. Here, the impact of a static electric field on dielectrophoretic nanowire assembly on gold electrodes is investigated. Specifically, a 4 peak‐to‐peak alternating voltage with 700 Hz is applied and modulate the offset voltage from 0 to 2V. The highest yield in the alignment of the nanowires at 0.5 V offset voltage is found. With the optical investigation of misaligned nanowires, it is found that rotating wires on top of electrodes, and the analysis of their angular velocity suggest the impact of the induced static charges. The numerical analysis quantifies the length scale of competing two forces, dielectrophoretic force and electric double layer force. This work suggests a quantitative understanding of the interplay between dielectrophoresis and electric double layer, which contributes to the advances in scalable nanowire fabrications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Systems Engineering Sookmyung Women's University Seoul 04310 South Korea
Institute of Advanced Materials and Systems Sookmyung Women's University Seoul 04310 South Korea
Department of Mechanical Engineering Hanyang University Seoul 04763 South Korea
Department of Applied Physics Korea University Sejong 30019 South Korea
School of Mechanical Engineering Hanyang University 222 Wangsimni‐ro, Seongdong‐gu Seoul 15588 South Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/LED.2017.268250010.1109/LED.2017.2682500 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.296033510.1063/1.2960335 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.367587810.1063/1.3675878 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2018.09.00410.1016/j.mechmat.2018.09.004 ↗
5. 10.1016/S1369-7021(05)00791-110.1016/S1369-7021(05)00791-1 ↗
6. 10.1088/0960-1317/21/12/12501810.1088/0960-1317/21/12/125018 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsami.0c2069410.1021/acsami.0c20694 ↗
8. 10.1021/nl025875l10.1021/nl025875l ↗
9. 10.1126/science.106271110.1126/science.1062711 ↗
10. 10.1038/nmat153210.1038/nmat1532 ↗
11. 10.1126/science.291.5504.63010.1126/science.291.5504.630 ↗
12. 10.1002/anie.20050029110.1002/anie.200500291 ↗
13. 10.1002/elps.20110016710.1002/elps.201100167 ↗
14. 10.1021/jp061367e10.1021/jp061367e ↗
15. 10.1038/nnano.2010.10610.1038/nnano.2010.106 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsami.7b0979410.1021/acsami.7b09794 ↗
17. 10.1039/B813639D10.1039/B813639D ↗
18. 10.1088/0960-1317/19/8/08300110.1088/0960-1317/19/8/083001 ↗
19. 10.1016/S1369-7021(09)70158-010.1016/S1369-7021(09)70158-0 ↗
20. 10.1021/nl900423g10.1021/nl900423g ↗
21. 10.1038/srep2831210.1038/srep28312 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.24720810.1103/PhysRevLett.94.247208 ↗
23. 10.1038/ncomms463210.1038/ncomms4632 ↗
24. 10.1088/0957-4484/23/46/46571010.1088/0957-4484/23/46/465710 ↗
25. 10.1006/jcis.1999.631110.1006/jcis.1999.6311 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0927-7757(98)00273-810.1016/S0927-7757(98)00273-8 ↗
27. 10.1021/jp012541w10.1021/jp012541w ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2011.04.01410.1016/j.ijleo.2011.04.014 ↗
29. 10.1021/la015657s10.1021/la015657s ↗
30. 10.1016/j.mee.2009.02.03210.1016/j.mee.2009.02.032 ↗
31. 10.1021/cm300570n10.1021/cm300570n ↗
32. 10.1039/D1AN01096D10.1039/D1AN01096D ↗
33. 10.3390/chemosensors909026010.3390/chemosensors9090260 ↗