Balancing aesthetics and usefulness: how visual transformation influences consumers’ intention to use smart clothing
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study investigates how visual transformative (VT) smart clothing, garments that dynamically change color, pattern, or silhouette through integrated materials or embedded technological mechanisms, influences consumer adoption by examining its effects on perceived usefulness (PU), aesthetics (AES), hedonic motivation (HM), and social influence (SI). Drawing on TAM, UTAUT, and UTAUT2, we modeled VT as the independent variable, perceived aesthetics (AES), perceived usefulness (PU), hedonic motivation (HM), and social influence (SI) as mediators, and age (AGE), socio-cultural experience (SCE), technological experience (TE), and individual innovativeness (II) as moderators. An online survey of 350 Korean women aged 20–59 evaluated function-oriented versus expression-oriented smart clothing stimuli. Data were analyzed using correlation analysis, hierarchical regression, and PROCESS macro models. VT significantly increased AES but decreased PU, producing a negative total effect on intention to use via a suppression pattern in which the adverse PU pathway outweighed aesthetic gains. AES and PU significantly mediated the VT–intention relationship, whereas HM and SI did not, indicating that adoption of VT garments is driven primarily by functional and aesthetic judgments rather than hedonic or social processes. Moderated mediation analyses showed that AGE, SCE, and TE strengthened the PU–intention path, amplifying the negative indirect effect of VT among younger, culturally exposed, and technologically experienced consumers, while II exerted only a limited influence. These findings conceptualize visually transformative smart clothing as a distinct category whose acceptance depends on resolving tensions between expressive appearance and functional credibility, offering guidance for the design and communication of technology-embedded fashion.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Color perception and design · Innovative Human-Technology Interaction · Fashion and Cultural Textiles
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (69)
Show source-provided references
1. Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.2.20410.1287/isre.9.2.204 ↗
2. Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x ↗
3. Arachchi, H. A. D. M., & Samarasinghe, G. D. (2023). Intention to adopt intelligent clothing in the fashion retail industry: Extending the HISAM model with technology readiness. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 40(20), 6374–6388. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.225462210.1080/10447318.2023.2254622 ↗
4. Baghirov, F., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Assessment of the association between aesthetic products and perceived product quality: An analysis of customer attitudes. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 41(7), 789–803. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcm-01-2024-652110.1108/jcm-01-2024-6521 ↗
5. Bellet, T., & Banet, A. (2023). UTAUT4-AV: An extension of the UTAUT model to study intention to use automated shuttles and the societal acceptance of different types of automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 99, 239–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2023.10.00710.1016/j.trf.2023.10.007 ↗
6. Bikos, L. H., Forman, R., & Patton, K. M. (2020). The Self-Efficacy for Sociocultural Adaptation Scale (SESCAS): Development and initial psychometric evaluation. The Counseling Psychologist, 49(1), 33–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/001100002095186110.1177/0011000020951861 ↗
7. Binyamin, S. S., & Hoque, M. R. (2020). Understanding the drivers of wearable health monitoring technology: An extension of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Sustainability, 12(22), 9605. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU1222960510.3390/SU12229605 ↗
8. Blazquez, M., Alexander, B., & Fung, K. (2020). Exploring Millennial’s perceptions towards luxury fashion wearable technology. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 24(3), 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfmm-09-2019-020010.1108/jfmm-09-2019-0200 ↗
9. Blut, M., & Wang, C. (2020). Technology readiness: A meta-analysis of conceptualizations of the construct and its impact on technology usage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(4), 649–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11747-019-00680-810.1007/S11747-019-00680-8 ↗
10. Chang, Y., Hsu, P., Chen, J., Shiau, W., & Xu, N. (2023). Utilitarian and/or hedonic shopping – Consumer motivation to purchase in smart stores. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 123(3), 821–842. https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-04-2022-025010.1108/imds-04-2022-0250 ↗
11. Chen, J., Wang, T., Fang, Z., & Wang, H. (2023). Research on elderly users’ intentions to accept wearable devices based on the improved UTAUT model. Frontiers in Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.103539810.3389/fpubh.2022.1035398 ↗
12. Chen, S., & Ye, J. (2023). Understanding consumers’ intentions to purchase smart clothing using PLS-SEM and fsQCA. PLoS ONE, 18(9), e0291870. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.029187010.1371/journal.pone.0291870 ↗
13. Chen, T., Yang, Q., Fang, C., Deng, S., & Xu, B. (2024). Advanced design for stimuli-reversible chromic wearables with customizable functionalities. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20241366510.1002/adma.202413665 ↗
14. Choi, K., & Kim, Y. (2016). Is the smartwatch an IT product or a fashion product? A study on factors affecting the intention to use smartwatches. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 777–786.10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.007 ↗
15. Crolic, C., Zheng, Y., Hoegg, J., & Alba, J. W. (2019). The influence of product aesthetics on consumer inference making. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 4(4), 398–408. https://doi.org/10.1086/70503310.1086/705033 ↗
16. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/24900810.2307/249008 ↗
17. Demerdash, D. E. (2018). Aesthetics of Light-Emitting Diode (LED) in illuminating Women smart fashion design. International Design Journal, 8(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.21608/idj.2018.8620910.21608/idj.2018.86209 ↗
18. Du, J., Markopoulos, P., Wang, Q., Toeters, M., & Gong, T. (2018). ShapeTex: Implementing shape-changing structures in fabric for wearable actuation. Tangible and Embedded Interaction, 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173225.317324510.1145/3173225.3173245 ↗
19. Eytam, E., Lowengart, O., & Tractinsky, N. (2020). Effects of visual simplicity in product design and individual differences in preference of interactive products. Review of Managerial Science, 15(5), 1347–1389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00391-310.1007/s11846-020-00391-3 ↗
20. Grover, V., Zhan, X., Sun, H., & Jiang, D. (2024). Fashionable consumer technology, IT fashion, and consumer behavior. Information Systems Research. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2020.008410.1287/isre.2020.0084 ↗
21. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.
22. Han, J., Forbes, H., & Schaefer, D. (2021). An exploration of how creativity, functionality, and aesthetics are related in design. Research in Engineering Design, 32(3), 289–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-021-00366-910.1007/s00163-021-00366-9 ↗
23. Hartman, J. B., Gehrt, K. C., & Watchravesringkan, K. (2004). Re-examination of the concept of innovativeness in the context of the adolescent segment: Development of a measurement scale. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 12(4), 353–365.10.1057/palgrave.jt.5740122 ↗
24. Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
25. Hirunyawipada, T., & Paswan, A. K. (2006). Consumer innovativeness and perceived risk: Implications for high technology product adoption. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(4), 182–198. https://doi.org/10.1108/0736376061067431010.1108/07363760610674310 ↗
26. Ishiuchi, J., Kai, S., Murase, H., Masuda, O., & Furukawa, T. (2022). Design and development of a smart fashion accessory. International Journal of Affective Engineering, 22(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.5057/ijae.ijae-d-21-0002310.5057/ijae.ijae-d-21-00023 ↗
27. Jeong, J., Kim, Y., & Roh, T. (2021). Do consumers care about aesthetics and compatibility? The intention to use wearable devices in health care. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244021104007010.1177/21582440211040070 ↗
28. Jeong, S. C., & Choi, B. J. (2022). Moderating effects of consumers’ personal innovativeness on the adoption and purchase intention of wearable devices. SAGE Open, 12(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244022113479810.1177/21582440221134798 ↗
29. Ju, N., & Lee, K. (2020). Consumer resistance to innovation: Smart clothing. Fashion and Textiles. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-020-00210-z10.1186/s40691-020-00210-z ↗
30. Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151.10.1177/001316446002000116 ↗
31. Kuriakose, M., & Nagasubramaniyan, G. (2024). Beyond pleasure, desire for meaningful consumption and peacefulness from digital entertainment platforms; extending UTAUT2 model with eudemonic motivation and tranquility. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.230547910.1080/10447318.2024.2305479 ↗
32. Kwarteng, M. A., Ntsiful, A., Osakwe, C. N., Jibril, A. B., & Chovancova, M. (2022). Cultural influences on future transportation technology usage: The role of personal innovativeness, technology anxiety and desire. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 47(2), 629–651. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.1285410.1111/ijcs.12854 ↗
33. Lancaster, B. P. (1999). Defining and Interpreting Suppressor Effects: Advantages and Limitations. ERIC. Retrieved March 25, 2025, from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED426097.pdf
34. Lee, E. (2021). Do tech products have a beauty premium? The effect of visual aesthetics of wearables on willingness-to-pay premium and the role of product category involvement. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 65, 102872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.10287210.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102872 ↗
35. Lee, S., & Lee, Y. (2018). Factors influencing the adoption of smart wearable devices. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(6), 391–398.
36. Leung, A. K., Maddux, W. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Chiu, C. (2008). Multicultural experience enhances creativity: The when and how. American Psychologist, 63(3), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.16910.1037/0003-066X.63.3.169 ↗
37. Li, J., Zhu, Y., & Chang, L. (2023). Study on the preparation and color-changing properties of smart fabric based on temperature-sensitive/light-sensitive dual-response. Materials Research Express, 10(4), 045702. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/accb2c10.1088/2053-1591/accb2c ↗
38. Lu, J., Yao, J. E., & Yu, C. (2005). Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless Internet services via mobile technology. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 14(3), 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2005.07.00310.1016/j.jsis.2005.07.003 ↗
39. Lynch, J. (2024, March 18). Vollebak unveils its all-new Firefly Jacket. Hypebeast. Retrieved January 25, 2025, from https://hypebeast.com/2024/3/vollebak-firefly-jacket-five-layer-outerwear-coat
40. Maddux, W. W., Lu, J. G., Affinito, S. J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2020). Multicultural experiences: A systematic review and new theoretical framework. Academy of Management Annals, 15(2), 345–376. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2019.013810.5465/annals.2019.0138 ↗
41. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages.
42. Mumcu, Y., & Kimzan, H. S. (2015). The effect of visual product aesthetics on consumers’ price sensitivity. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 528–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00883-710.1016/s2212-5671(15)00883-7 ↗
43. OECD. (2023). OECD reviews of innovation policy: Korea 2023. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/bdcf9685-en10.1787/bdcf9685-en ↗
44. Pal, D., Funilkul, S., & Papasratorn, B. (2019). Antecedents of trust and the continuance intention in IoT-based smart products: The case of consumer wearables. IEEE Access, 7, 184160–184171. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.296046710.1109/access.2019.2960467 ↗
45. Perry, A. (2016). Factors that influence consumers’ purchase intention of smart closets. International Journal of Fashion Design Technology and Education, 10(1), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2016.120233210.1080/17543266.2016.1202332 ↗
46. Petrescu, M., Kachen, S., Dobre, C., Milovan-Ciuta, A., & Orzan, M. (2024). Decoding the dual desire: Expressive and impressive motivations for neo-luxury wearables. Journal of Marketing Communications. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2024.232855810.1080/13527266.2024.2328558 ↗
47. Petrescu, M., Namin, A., & Richard, M. (2023). Technology within cultures: Segmenting the wired consumers in Canada, France, and the USA. Journal of Business Research, 164, 113972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.11397210.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113972 ↗
48. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.87910.3758/BRM.40.3.879 ↗
49. Project Primrose. (2024, January 25). Adobe Research. Retrieved December 10, 2024, from https://research.adobe.com/news/project-primrose-the-story-behind-the-digital-dress-gone-viral/
50. Puri, S., Pandey, S., & Chawla, D. (2022). Impact of technology, health and consumer-related factors on continued usage intention of wearable fitness tracking (WFT) devices. Benchmarking an International Journal, 30(9), 3444–3464. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-12-2020-064710.1108/bij-12-2020-0647 ↗
51. Puriwat, W., & Tripopsakul, S. (2021). Explaining social media adoption for a business purpose: An application of the UTAUT model. Sustainability, 13(4), 2082. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU1304208210.3390/SU13042082 ↗
52. Reichel, P., Bassler, C. T., & Spörrle, M. (2024). Embracing the enhanced self now and in the future: The impact of temporal focus, age, and sex on cyborg products use intention. Personality and Individual Differences, 225, 112665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2024.11266510.1016/j.paid.2024.112665 ↗
53. Ruckdashel, R. R., Venkataraman, D., & Park, J. H. (2021). Smart textiles: A toolkit to fashion the future. Journal of Applied Physics, 129(13), 130903. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.002400610.1063/5.0024006 ↗
54. Schnurr, B., & Stokburger-Sauer, N. (2016). The effect of stylistic product information on consumers’ aesthetic responses. Psychology & Marketing, 33(3), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1002/MAR.2086310.1002/MAR.20863 ↗
55. Sparkman, D. J., Eidelman, S., & Blanchar, J. C. (2016). Multicultural experiences reduce prejudice through personality shifts in openness to experience. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(7), 840–853. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.218910.1002/ejsp.2189 ↗
56. Stevens, J. P., & Stevens, J. P. (2001). Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. In Psychology Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/978141060449110.4324/9781410604491 ↗
57. Stylios, G. K., & Chen, M. (2020). The concept of psychotextiles; Interactions between changing patterns and the human visual brain, by a novel composite SMART fabric. Materials, 13(3), 725. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1303072510.3390/ma13030725 ↗
58. Tessmer, L., Carmel Marie, D., Sparrman, B., Kernizan, S., Laucks, J., & Tibbits, S. (2019). Active textile tailoring. International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. https://doi.org/10.1145/3305367.332799510.1145/3305367.3327995 ↗
59. Van der Heijden, H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695–704.10.2307/25148660 ↗
60. Venkatesh, N., Morris, N., Davis, N., & Davis, N. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003654010.2307/30036540 ↗
61. Venkatesh, N., Thong, N., & Xu, N. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157. https://doi.org/10.2307/4141041210.2307/41410412 ↗
62. Wu, C., & Lim, G. G. (2024). Investigating older adults users’ willingness to adopt wearable devices by integrating the technology acceptance model (UTAUT2) and the Technology Readiness Index theory. Frontiers in Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.144959410.3389/fpubh.2024.1449594 ↗
63. Wu, F., Samper, A., Morales, A. C., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2017). It’s too pretty to use! When and how enhanced product aesthetics discourage usage and lower consumption enjoyment. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(3), 651–672. https://doi.org/10.1093/JCR/UCX05710.1093/JCR/UCX057 ↗
64. Wu, X., Liu, Q., Zheng, L., Lin, S., Zhang, Y., Song, Y., & Wang, Z. (2024). Innervate Commercial Fabrics with Spirally-Layered Iontronic Fibrous Sensors Toward Dual-Functional Smart Garments. Advanced Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.20240276710.1002/advs.202402767 ↗
65. WWD. (2023, April 24). Stone Island drops Series 07 of Prototype Research collection: change-color edition. WWD. Retrieved January 11, 2025, from https://wwd.com/fashion-news/fashion-scoops/stone-island-series-07-prototype-research-change-color-1235623555/
66. Xu, Z.-Y., Li, L., Du, L., Wang, L., Wang, L., Shi, L.-Y., Yang, K.-K., & Wang, Y.-Z. (2021). Multiscale shape-memory effects in a dynamic polymer network for synchronous changes in color and shape. Applied Materials Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APMT.2021.10127610.1016/J.APMT.2021.101276 ↗
67. Yi, M. Y., Fiedler, K. D., & Park, J. S. (2006). Understanding the role of individual innovativeness in the acceptance of IT‐Based innovations: Comparative analyses of models and measures*. Decision Sciences, 37(3), 393–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5414.2006.00132.x10.1111/j.1540-5414.2006.00132.x ↗
68. Zang, X., Ma, H., Sun, Y., Tang, Y., Ji, J., & Xue, M. (2022). Integrated polypyrrole-based smart clothing with photothermal conversion and thermosensing functions for wearable applications. Langmuir, 38(32), 9967–9973. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c0127810.1021/acs.langmuir.2c01278 ↗
69. Zhang, H., Li, B., Hu, B., & Ai, P. (2025). Exploring the role of personal Innovativeness on purchase intention of artificial intelligence products: An investigation using social influence theory and value-based adoption model. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2025.251303710.1080/10447318.2025.2513037 ↗