Anisotropic Wetting Behavior on Gradient Surface Structures Fabricated by Direct Laser Interference Patterning on Stainless Steel
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this work, anisotropic line‐like textures with gradually increasing spatial periods from 2.0 to 4.8 µm are fabricated on stainless steel by two‐beam Direct Laser Interference Patterning using a ps‐laser source. Three manufacturing strategies are developed to fabricate these so‐called gradient structures achieving different surface roughness Rz and overall texture uniformity. The influence of unidirectional texture gradients on anisotropic wetting properties is studied by depositing 1 µL water droplets. The results show that the optimum‐designed gradient patterns induce in all cases the spontaneous motion of water droplets in the direction of increasing periodicity, or equivalently, increasing hydrophilicity. It is also observed a direct correlation between the gradient ratio and the traveling distance, which reaches a maximum of 0.99 mm for a period gradient of 2.24 µm mm−1. Furthermore, multidirectional gradient textures are produced by combining gradient areas with opposing gradient orientations. The anisotropic wetting characteristics on such complex textures are measured, showing a strong local dependency of the water contact angle and droplet displacement. The findings from this work provide new design rules for customizing gradient surfaces able to realize predictable, position‐dependent wetting properties and directional movement of microliter water droplets.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Laser Material Processing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institut für Fertigungstechnik Technische Universität Dresden George‐Bähr‐Str. 3c 01069 Dresden Germany
Fraunhofer‐Institut für Werkstoff und Strahltechnik (IWS) Winterbergstr 28 01277 Dresden Germany
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.508508110.1063/1.5085081 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.490565310.1063/1.4905653 ↗
3. 10.1039/C4LC00650J10.1039/C4LC00650J ↗
4. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.03.00510.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.03.005 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.tifs.2012.11.00610.1016/j.tifs.2012.11.006 ↗
6. 10.1007/978-3-319-94625-2_610.1007/978-3-319-94625-2_6 ↗
7. 10.1002/smll.20150333410.1002/smll.201503334 ↗
8. 10.1038/nprot.2017.16010.1038/nprot.2017.160 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.277713910.1063/1.2777139 ↗
10. 10.1002/polb.2429810.1002/polb.24298 ↗
11. 10.1039/C5RA00469A10.1039/C5RA00469A ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b0360410.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03604 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2011.07.02210.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2011.07.022 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.07.01510.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.07.015 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c0251810.1021/acs.langmuir.1c02518 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c0251710.1021/acs.langmuir.1c02517 ↗
17. 10.1038/srep1624010.1038/srep16240 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2015.10.00310.1016/j.optlaseng.2015.10.003 ↗
19. 10.1002/aisy.20210005110.1002/aisy.202100051 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2024.11135810.1016/j.optlastec.2024.111358 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.08.00410.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.08.004 ↗
22. 10.37188/lam.2021.00310.37188/lam.2021.003 ↗
23. 10.1021/nl200426g10.1021/nl200426g ↗
24. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2022.10685710.1016/j.porgcoat.2022.106857 ↗
25. 10.1002/dro2.5210.1002/dro2.52 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsomega.3c0153610.1021/acsomega.3c01536 ↗
27. 10.1021/la802033q10.1021/la802033q ↗
28. 10.1063/1.480292610.1063/1.4802926 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41598-020-79936-110.1038/s41598-020-79936-1 ↗
30. Schell F. · Surf. Coat. Technol. · 447
31. 10.1016/j.tsf.2008.01.01110.1016/j.tsf.2008.01.011 ↗
32. 10.1109/JMEMS.2006.87679110.1109/JMEMS.2006.876791 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.09.03910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.09.039 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.10653210.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106532 ↗
35. Neuenschwander B. · SPIE · 2012 · 8243
36. 10.1016/j.mlblux.2022.10014410.1016/j.mlblux.2022.100144 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2019.10595410.1016/j.optlastec.2019.105954 ↗
38. 10.1002/admi.20200165610.1002/admi.202001656 ↗
39. 10.3390/ma1401018410.3390/ma14010184 ↗
40. 10.3390/nanomanufacturing204001510.3390/nanomanufacturing2040015 ↗
41. 10.1515/nanoph-2021-059110.1515/nanoph-2021-0591 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.06.10010.1016/j.apsusc.2016.06.100 ↗
43. 10.2351/1.471265810.2351/1.4712658 ↗
44. 10.1002/adem.20240050010.1002/adem.202400500 ↗
45. J.Bonse S.Höhm S.Kirner A.Rosenfeld J.Krüger inOptics InfoBase Conference Papers Optica Publishing Group San Jose CL2016 sth1q3.10.1364/CLEO_SI.2016.STh1Q.3 ↗
46. 10.1039/B514811C10.1039/B514811C ↗
47. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c0061810.1021/acs.langmuir.4c00618 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.triboint.2021.10731610.1016/j.triboint.2021.107316 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.ces.2020.11613610.1016/j.ces.2020.116136 ↗
50. 10.1021/la402424d10.1021/la402424d ↗
51. 10.1038/s41598-017-07867-510.1038/s41598-017-07867-5 ↗
52. Zhang D. · AIP Adv. · 2018 · 8