New Insights Into the Effects of Electrode Polarization of Chitosan on Graphene Nanomaterials
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The efficient transfer of electrons between the electrode and the analyte, influenced by electrode polarization (EP), is a crucial yet often overlooked factor in assessing the performance of electrochemical systems. This study explores the use of chitosan as an EP suppressor for graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (RGO) in a ferri/ferro cyanide redox probe, using cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) techniques. The CV results indicate that GO has greater pseudocapacitance than RGO does, indicating a greater abundance of oxygen‐containing functional groups that facilitate stronger interfacial interactions with chitosan. By reducing the capacitive current, as shown through EIS, the sensitivity toward the Fe2+/3+ redox couple at the electrode double layer is enhanced. These findings align with density functional theory (DFT) calculations, which indicate a charge distortion favoring chitosan, thereby allowing more efficient intrinsic electron transfer within the aromatic rings of the GO/RGO graphene nanomaterials. This research holds significant potential for advancing the development of more efficient sensors and energy storage devices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Conducting polymers and applications · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry Durban University of Technology P.O. Box 1334 Durban 4000 South Africa
Funding
National Research Foundation · Durban University of Technology
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Rothschild N. M. V. · Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. · 1938 · 125 · 283
2. 10.1007/BF0119161210.1007/BF01191612 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.12903910.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.129039 ↗
4. 10.1088/1741-2552/aa9f3110.1088/1741-2552/aa9f31 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsami.4c0076710.1021/acsami.4c00767 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.bios.2011.06.05010.1016/j.bios.2011.06.050 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.512358510.1063/1.5123585 ↗
8. 10.3390/ijms2214772610.3390/ijms22147726 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.aiepr.2023.03.00110.1016/j.aiepr.2023.03.001 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.06.10310.1016/j.electacta.2018.06.103 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jece.2024.11320810.1016/j.jece.2024.113208 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.10539410.1016/j.jwpe.2024.105394 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.13266910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.132669 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.sajce.2024.03.00910.1016/j.sajce.2024.03.009 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsomega.7b0149810.1021/acsomega.7b01498 ↗
16. 10.1038/srep4225810.1038/srep42258 ↗
17. 10.1021/am100222m10.1021/am100222m ↗
18. 10.1039/c1jm13214h10.1039/c1jm13214h ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2023.11736310.1016/j.jelechem.2023.117363 ↗
20. Macdonald J. R. · 2018
21. 10.33961/jecst.2022.0045110.33961/jecst.2022.00451 ↗
22. 10.1039/C5CS00578G10.1039/C5CS00578G ↗
23. 10.1021/acsanm.1c0029010.1021/acsanm.1c00290 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsami.6b0632510.1021/acsami.6b06325 ↗
25. 10.1021/ed060p70210.1021/ed060p702 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b0036110.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00361 ↗
27. D. S.Biovia Dassault Systemes San Diego2016.
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.45.1324410.1103/PhysRevB.45.13244 ↗
29. 10.1021/jp051022g10.1021/jp051022g ↗
30. 10.1063/1.45845210.1063/1.458452 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.131601510.1063/1.1316015 ↗
32. 10.1039/P2993000079910.1039/P29930000799 ↗
33. 10.1021/jp980017s10.1021/jp980017s ↗
34. 10.1002/cphc.20190004510.1002/cphc.201900045 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.12705210.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127052 ↗