journal article·2026-06-23Open access

From prompting to attribute-based interaction: a taxonomy-driven framework for fashion image generation

Lidiia Khleborodova, Eung Tae Kim

Fashion and Textiles· Volume 13· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Translating abstract design intent into text-based prompts presents a practical barrier in generative AI–mediated design, particularly for novice users who lack stable design vocabulary. This study proposes a structured interaction framework that replaces free-form prompting with attribute-based design variable selection, implemented as a web-based fashion image generation system. The system organizes six core fashion design attributes into a taxonomy-driven variable space and converts user selections into prompts through a rule-based translation pipeline. To examine the proposed framework, the study combined exploratory image-generation analysis with a user study. The evaluation investigated whether structured prompt construction could preserve attribute-level interpretability across diffusion-based image generation conditions and how users perceived the interaction structure during fashion ideation tasks. The results suggest that the proposed interaction framework supports relatively stable attribute reflection and enables users to explore design variations through more structured and interpretable interaction processes. The study contributes to human–AI interaction design by demonstrating how domain-specific structure can be embedded into generative AI interaction architectures to reduce reliance on prompt-writing skills and support more transparent relationships between user input and generated output.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis · Design Education and Practice · Data Visualization and Analytics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Calderin, J., & Volpintesta, L. (2013). The fashion design reference & specification book: everything fashion designers need to know every day. Rockport Publishers.
2. Chen, Y., & Ma, J. (2025). An intelligent generative method of fashion design combining attribute knowledge and stable diffusion model. Textile Research Journal, 95(11–12), 1231–1254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517524128957810.1177/00405175241289578 ↗
3. Cherry, E., & Latulipe, C. (2014). Quantifying the creativity support of digital tools through the Creativity Support Index. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 21(4), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/261758810.1145/2617588 ↗
4. Choi, W., Jang, S., Kim, H. Y., Lee, Y., Lee, S. G., Lee, H., & Park, S. (2023). Developing an AI-based automated fashion design system: reflecting the work process of fashion designers. Fashion and Textiles, 10(1), Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-023-00360-w10.1186/s40691-023-00360-w ↗
5. Cross, N. (2006). Designerly ways of knowing. Springer.
6. Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38(3), 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.102210.1006/imms.1993.1022 ↗
7. Fashionary. (2016). Fashionpedia: the visual dictionary of fashion design. Fashionary International Limited.
8. Fashionary. (2021). Textilepedia: the complete fabric guide. Fashionary International Limited.
9. Fashionary. (2023). Stylepedia: a visual directory of fashion styles. Fashionary International Limited.
10. Feng, Y., Wang, X., Wong, K. K., Wang, S., Lu, Y., Zhu, M., Wang, B., & Chen, W. (2023). Promptmagician: Interactive prompt engineering for text-to-image creation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 30(1), 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2023.332716810.1109/TVCG.2023.3327168 ↗
11. Gero, J. S. (2000). Computational models of innovative and creative design processes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 64(2–3), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(99)00105-510.1016/S0040-1625(99)00105-5 ↗
12. Goloujeh, A. M., Sullivan, A., & Magerko, B. (2024). Is it AI or is it me? Understanding users’ prompt journey with text-to-image generative AI tools. In CHI '24: Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–13). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.364286110.1145/3613904.3642861 ↗
13. Guo, Z., Zhu, Z., Li, Y., Cao, S., Chen, H., & Wang, G. (2023). AI assisted fashion design: A review. IEEE Access, 11, 88403–88415. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.330623510.1109/ACCESS.2023.3306235 ↗
14. Hertz, A., Mokady, R., Tenenbaum, J., Aberman, K., Pritch, Y., & Cohen-Or, D. (2022). Prompt-to-prompt image editing with cross attention control. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2208.0162610.48550/arXiv.2208.01626 ↗
15. Jang, S., Kim, H. Y., Kim, S., Choi, W., Jeong, J., & Lee, Y. (2022). Development of online fashion thesaurus and taxonomy for text mining. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 46(6), 1142–1160. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2022.46.6.114210.5850/JKSCT.2022.46.6.1142 ↗
16. Jeon, Y., Jin, S., Shih, P. C., & Han, K. (2021). FashionQ: an AI-driven creativity support tool for facilitating ideation in fashion design. In CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–18). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.344509310.1145/3411764.3445093 ↗
17. Jia, M., Shi, M., Sirotenko, M., Cui, Y., Cardie, C., Hariharan, B., Adam, H., & Belongie, S. (2020). Fashionpedia: ontology, segmentation, and an attribute localization dataset. In A. Vedaldi, H. Bischof, T. Brox, & J.-M. Frahm (Eds.), Computer vision—ECCV 2020 (Vol. 12346, pp. 316–332). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58452-8_1910.1007/978-3-030-58452-8_19 ↗
18. Jin, Y., Yoon, J., Self, J. A., & Lee, K. (2024). AI as a catalyst for creativity: exploring the use of generative approach in fashion design for improving their inspiration. In C. M. Gray, E. Ciliotta Chehade, P. Hekkert, L. Forlano, P. Ciuccarelli, & P. Lloyd (Eds.), DRS2024: Boston. Design Research Society. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2024.68010.21606/drs.2024.680 ↗
19. Knoth, N., Tolzin, A., Janson, A., & Leimeister, J. M. (2024). AI literacy and its implications for prompt engineering strategies. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.10022510.1016/j.caeai.2024.100225 ↗
20. Lam, N. Y. K. (2025). Interactive learning meets AI: elevating student experiences in fashion and culture education. In EDULEARN25 Proceedings: 17th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (pp. 2119–2126). IATED Academy. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2025.060910.21125/edulearn.2025.0609 ↗
21. Lee, J., Kim, J., & Lee, H. (2025). Diffusedesigner: sketch-based controllable clothing image generation. Fashion and Textiles, 12(1), Article 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-025-00426-x10.1186/s40691-025-00426-x ↗
22. Lewis, J. (2018). The system usability scale: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 34(7), 577–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.145530710.1080/10447318.2018.1455307 ↗
23. Liu, V., & Chilton, L. B. (2022). Design guidelines for prompt engineering text-to-image generative models. In CHI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–23). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.350182510.1145/3491102.3501825 ↗
24. Mbeledogu, E. (2022). Fashion design research (2nd ed.). Laurence King Publishing.
25. Mete, F. (2006). The creative role of sources of inspiration in clothing design. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 18(4), 278–293. https://doi.org/10.1108/0955622061066850910.1108/09556220610668509 ↗
26. Myers, B. A. (1998). A brief history of human-computer interaction technology. Interactions, 5(2), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/274430.27443610.1145/274430.274436 ↗
27. Oliveira, A., Morais, A., Lopes, A. C., Castro, D., & Zille, A. (2025). Case study: evaluating the usefulness of various AI tools in fashion design. In J. Cunha, A. C. Broega, H. Carvalho, & B. Providência (Eds.), Advances in fashion and design research III (CIMODE 2024). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-83185-0_2610.1007/978-3-031-83185-0_26 ↗
28. Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_110.1207/S15326985EP3801_1 ↗
29. Pan, R. C., Kuo, S. P., & Strobel, J. (2010). Novice students' difficulties and remedies with the conceptualization phase of design. In 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings (pp. 15.917.1–15.917.13). American Society for Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--1635810.18260/1-2--16358 ↗
30. Park, N., & Choi, Y. (2020). A form attribute classification system for fashion items. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 13(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2019.166464110.1080/17543266.2019.1664641 ↗
31. Phoenix, J., & Taylor, M. (2024). Prompt engineering for generative AI. O’Reilly Media.
32. Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_110.1207/s15326985ep3902_1 ↗
33. Tagwalk. (n.d.). Tagwalk: the fashion search engine. https://www.tag-walk.com/en/
34. Tao, S., Liang, I., Peng, C., Wang, Z., Palani, S., & Dow, S. P. (2025). DesignWeaver: dimensional scaffolding for text-to-image product design. In CHI '25: Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–18). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.371421110.1145/3706598.3714211 ↗
35. Tenner, E. (2015). The design of everyday things by Donald Norman. Technology and Culture, 56(3), 785–787. https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2015.010410.1353/tech.2015.0104 ↗
36. Travers-Spencer, S., & Zaman, Z. (2008). The fashion designer’s directory of shape and style. Barrons Educational Series.
37. Trusca, M. M., Nuyts, W., Thomm, J., Honig, R., Hofmann, T., Tuytelaars, T., & Moens, M. F. (2024). Object-attribute binding in text-to-image generation: evaluation and control. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.1376610.48550/arXiv.2404.13766 ↗
38. Vogue. (n.d.). Fashion week, runway, designer collections. https://www.vogue.com/fashion-shows
39. Wang, R., Liu, T., Hsieh, C. J., & Gong, B. (2024). On discrete prompt optimization for diffusion models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.0160610.48550/arXiv.2407.01606 ↗
40. Wu, C., & De la Torre, F. (2024). Contrastive prompts improve disentanglement in text-to-image diffusion models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.1349010.48550/arXiv.2402.13490 ↗
41. You, J., Lin, Y., & Hu, B. (2025). Enhancing aesthetic image generation with reinforcement learning guided prompt optimization in stable diffusion. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 114, Article 104641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvcir.2025.10464110.1016/j.jvcir.2025.104641 ↗
42. Zamfirescu-Pereira, J. D., Wong, R. Y., Hartmann, B., & Yang, Q. (2023). Why Johnny can’t prompt: how non-AI experts try (and fail) to design LLM prompts. In CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–21). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.358138810.1145/3544548.3581388 ↗
43. Zou, X., Kong, X., Wong, W., Wang, C., Liu, Y., & Cao, Y. (2019). FashionAI: a hierarchical dataset for fashion understanding. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Workshops. Computer Vision Foundation. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPRW.2019.0003910.1109/CVPRW.2019.00039 ↗