journal article·2021-12Open access

Biophysical Considerations in the Rational Design and Cellular Targeting of Flexible Polymeric Nanoparticles

Samaneh Farokhirad, Sreeja Kutti Kandy, Andrew Tsourkas, Portonovo S. Ayyaswamy, David M. Eckmann, Ravi Radhakrishnan

Advanced Materials Interfaces· Volume 8· Issue 23

Abstract

Abstract How nanoparticle (NP) mechanical properties impact multivalent ligand–receptor‐mediated binding to cell surfaces, the avidity, propensity for internalization, and effects due to crowding remains unknown or unquantified. Through computational analyses, the effects of NP composition from soft, deformable NPs to rigid spheres, effect of tethers, the crowding of NPs at the membrane surface, and the cell membrane properties such as cytoskeletal interactions are addressed. Analyses of binding mechanisms of three distinct NPs that differ in type and rigidity (core‐corona flexible NP, rigid NP, and rigid‐tethered NP) but are otherwise similar in size and ligand surface density are reported; moreover, for the case of flexible NP, NP stiffness is tuned by varying the internal crosslinking density. Biophysical modeling of NP binding to membranes together with thermodynamic analysis powered by free energy calculations is employed, and it is shown that efficient cellular targeting and uptake of NP functionalized with targeting ligand molecules can be shaped by factors including NP flexibility and crowding, receptor–ligand binding avidity, state of the membrane cytoskeleton, and curvature inducing proteins. Rational design principles that confer tension, membrane excess area, and cytoskeletal sensing properties to the NP which can be exploited for cell‐specific targeting of NP are uncovered.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark NJ 07114 USA

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA 19104 USA

Department of Bioengineering University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA 19104 USA

Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA 19104 USA

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering University of California Los Angeles CA 90095 USA

Department of Anesthesiology The Ohio State University Columbus OH 43210 USA

Funding

National Institutes of Health · National Science Foundation · National Cancer Institute

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/polym1104074510.3390/polym11040745 ↗
2. 10.1038/mtm.2016.2310.1038/mtm.2016.23 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41565-020-00822-y10.1038/s41565-020-00822-y ↗
4. 10.1039/C7NR08856F10.1039/C7NR08856F ↗
5. 10.1016/j.bios.2020.11243710.1016/j.bios.2020.112437 ↗
6. 10.1007/s42247-020-00143-910.1007/s42247-020-00143-9 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41573-020-0090-810.1038/s41573-020-0090-8 ↗
8. 10.1021/jacs.8b1255310.1021/jacs.8b12553 ↗
9. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19981102)37:20<2754::AID-ANIE2754>3.0.CO;2-310.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19981102)37:20<2754::AID-ANIE2754>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2004.10.00410.1016/j.cbpa.2004.10.004 ↗
11. 10.1073/pnas.130310911010.1073/pnas.1303109110 ↗
12. 10.1021/ma501491810.1021/ma5014918 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.494825710.1063/1.4948257 ↗
14. 10.1021/nn303508c10.1021/nn303508c ↗
15. 10.1039/C9NR02710F10.1039/C9NR02710F ↗
16. 10.1039/C8NR09594A10.1039/C8NR09594A ↗
17. 10.1039/C9NR07063J10.1039/C9NR07063J ↗
18. 10.1039/C7SM01751K10.1039/C7SM01751K ↗
19. 10.1115/1.402324610.1115/1.4023246 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.01.00910.1016/j.actbio.2014.01.009 ↗
21. 10.1039/C9SM01653H10.1039/C9SM01653H ↗
22. 10.1002/adma.20180237310.1002/adma.201802373 ↗
23. 10.1038/ncb240910.1038/ncb2409 ↗
24. 10.1088/1478-3975/ab48d510.1088/1478-3975/ab48d5 ↗
25. 10.1073/pnas.101001310810.1073/pnas.1010013108 ↗
26. 10.1039/C5SC00416K10.1039/C5SC00416K ↗
27. 10.1021/nn503732m10.1021/nn503732m ↗
28. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0014710.1021/acsnano.5b00147 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0579210.1021/acsnano.5b05792 ↗
30. 10.1371/journal.pone.010232910.1371/journal.pone.0102329 ↗
31. 10.1098/rsos.16026010.1098/rsos.160260 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.03.00710.1016/j.bpj.2018.03.007 ↗
33. 10.1007/s12572-015-0159-510.1007/s12572-015-0159-5 ↗
34. 10.1073/pnas.100661110710.1073/pnas.1006611107 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.05.06310.1016/j.bpj.2011.05.063 ↗
36. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0478910.1021/acsnano.9b04789 ↗
37. R.Phillips J.Kondev J.Theriot Phys. Biol. Cell Garland Science Taylor & Francis Group2009.
38. 10.1016/S0960-9822(99)80206-110.1016/S0960-9822(99)80206-1 ↗
39. Ramanan V. · Int. Biol.: Quant. Biosci. Nano Macro · 2011 · 3 · 803
40. 10.1049/iet-syb.2013.005710.1049/iet-syb.2013.0057 ↗
41. 10.1021/nn305773f10.1021/nn305773f ↗
42. 10.1016/j.cis.2014.02.01710.1016/j.cis.2014.02.017 ↗
43. 10.1073/pnas.160525911310.1073/pnas.1605259113 ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRevE.92.04271510.1103/PhysRevE.92.042715 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.09.06710.1016/j.jconrel.2011.09.067 ↗
46. S.Muro V. R.Muzykantov Organelle‐Specific Pharm. Nanotechnol Wiley‐Blackwell2010 p.449.10.1002/9780470875780.ch24 ↗
47. 10.1007/s11051-017-3840-810.1007/s11051-017-3840-8 ↗