journal article·2019-06

A Novel Strategy for the Selection of Polysulfide Adsorbents Toward High‐Performance Lithium‐Sulfur Batteries

Xiaonan Shang, Tianfeng Qin, Pengqian Guo, Kai Sun, Hao Su, Kun Tao, Deyan He

Advanced Materials Interfaces· Volume 6· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Selection of polysulfide adsorbents for most lithium‐sulfur batteries (LSBs) has only one purpose, which is to suppress the shuttle effect. However, addition of the polysulfides adsorbents inevitably reduces the energy density of LSBs. In this article, a new idea to select a polar cathode material whose discharge–charge voltage coincides with sulfur is proposed. It can adsorb polysulfides and provides part of capacity in the discharge of LSBs. TiO2 is used as an example to prove the feasibility of such an idea, and prepares a sandwich structure cathode via a simple method. In situ X‐ray diffraction is carried out to directly monitor the structural changes of the sandwich‐structured cathode during the discharge–charge processes. The experimental data verify the idea and the work provides a new strategy for the selection of polysulfide adsorbents in the future.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Electromagnetic wave absorption materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Physical Science and Technology Key Laboratory for Magnetism and Magnetic Materials of the Ministry of Education Lanzhou University Lanzhou 730000 China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adfm.20180091910.1002/adfm.201800919 ↗
2. 10.1007/s41918-018-0021-010.1007/s41918-018-0021-0 ↗
3. 10.1002/adfm.20170753610.1002/adfm.201707536 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0316510.1021/acs.jpclett.7b03165 ↗
5. 10.1021/am505829v10.1021/am505829v ↗
6. 10.1016/j.nantod.2018.02.00610.1016/j.nantod.2018.02.006 ↗
7. 10.1002/anie.20141110910.1002/anie.201411109 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.11.17510.1016/j.electacta.2018.11.175 ↗
9. 10.1039/C6TA03098J10.1039/C6TA03098J ↗
10. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.01.06010.1016/j.nanoen.2017.01.060 ↗
11. 10.1021/jacs.5b0874310.1021/jacs.5b08743 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.06.02210.1016/j.nanoen.2014.06.022 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.03010.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.030 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20160175910.1002/adma.201601759 ↗
15. 10.1038/ncomms1120310.1038/ncomms11203 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.12.06710.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.12.067 ↗
17. 10.1039/C7EE01430A10.1039/C7EE01430A ↗
18. 10.1002/smll.20160253910.1002/smll.201602539 ↗
19. 10.1002/smll.20180244310.1002/smll.201802443 ↗
20. 10.1002/aenm.20180070910.1002/aenm.201800709 ↗
21. 10.1039/C7NR09216D10.1039/C7NR09216D ↗
22. 10.1039/C8TA02027B10.1039/C8TA02027B ↗
23. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.07.00110.1016/j.nanoen.2015.07.001 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.11.02010.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.11.020 ↗
25. 10.1002/adfm.20180184910.1002/adfm.201801849 ↗
26. 10.1002/adfm.20160571110.1002/adfm.201605711 ↗
27. 10.1002/smll.20170101310.1002/smll.201701013 ↗
28. 10.1002/admi.20170160210.1002/admi.201701602 ↗
29. 10.1039/C5EE03902A10.1039/C5EE03902A ↗
30. 10.1002/adma.20140563710.1002/adma.201405637 ↗
31. 10.1002/adma.20150314910.1002/adma.201503149 ↗
32. 10.1002/adma.20170733410.1002/adma.201707334 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.06.05210.1016/j.nanoen.2018.06.052 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.06.01110.1016/j.nanoen.2018.06.011 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.06.12910.1016/j.apsusc.2017.06.129 ↗
36. 10.1021/acsami.6b1003210.1021/acsami.6b10032 ↗
37. 10.1002/adma.20150441210.1002/adma.201504412 ↗
38. 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
41. 10.1021/cm504466710.1021/cm5044667 ↗