journal article·2019-02

Improved Performance of Quantum‐Dot Photodetectors Using Cheap and Environmentally Friendly Polyethylene Glycol

Jinhyeon Kang, Dasom Park, Moon‐Ki Jeong, Junho Kim, Seung Hun Eom, Sung‐Yeon Jang, Sanggyu Yim, In Hwan Jung

Advanced Materials Interfaces· Volume 6· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Colloidal quantum dot (CQD) photodetectors (PDs) are developed. The on/off current ratio is improved by applying organic cathode buffer layers (CBLs), such as polyethylenimine ethoxylated (PEIE) and polyethylene glycol (PEG). The on‐current of CQD‐PDs (QPDs) is increased by the decreased work function of ZnO/CBLs via forming a permanent dipole moment at the interface of ZnO and CBLs. The off‐current is significantly decreased by the improved interfacial morphology via softening the ZnO surfaces. In the photoconductive mode for the fast response time of a signal, PEG‐ and PEIE‐treated QPDs exhibit improved photodetecting properties. Notably, the performance of PEG‐treated QPDs fluctuates less at the concentration of the prepared CBL solution. The utilization of environmentally friendly and cheap PEG as CBLs is attractive for QPDs. The organic CBL is highly effective for QPDs to improve both on‐ and off‐current characteristics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Perovskite Materials and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry Kookmin University Seoul 02707 Republic of Korea

Division of Advanced Materials Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology (KRICT) Daejeon 34114 Republic of Korea

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea · Ministry of Science ICT and Future Planning

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b0006310.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00063 ↗
2. 10.1038/nphoton.2008.3410.1038/nphoton.2008.34 ↗
3. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.32810.1038/nphoton.2012.328 ↗
4. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.3310.1038/nphoton.2012.33 ↗
5. 10.1002/adom.20170030110.1002/adom.201700301 ↗
6. 10.1039/C8TC00521D10.1039/C8TC00521D ↗
7. 10.1021/nn900863a10.1021/nn900863a ↗
8. 10.1063/1.273567410.1063/1.2735674 ↗
9. 10.1021/nn100129j10.1021/nn100129j ↗
10. 10.1038/nmat311810.1038/nmat3118 ↗
11. 10.1038/nmat129910.1038/nmat1299 ↗
12. 10.1038/srep3791310.1038/srep37913 ↗
13. 10.1002/adom.20180007710.1002/adom.201800077 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.bios.2013.04.02410.1016/j.bios.2013.04.024 ↗
15. 10.1039/C7TC05474B10.1039/C7TC05474B ↗
16. 10.1063/1.358936610.1063/1.3589366 ↗
17. 10.1038/nnano.2012.6010.1038/nnano.2012.60 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0367710.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03677 ↗
19. 10.1002/adma.20170235010.1002/adma.201702350 ↗
20. 10.1039/C8TC00288F10.1039/C8TC00288F ↗
21. 10.1002/adfm.20170669010.1002/adfm.201706690 ↗
22. 10.1039/C5RA21087A10.1039/C5RA21087A ↗
23. 10.1063/1.303907610.1063/1.3039076 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.03.01510.1016/j.orgel.2017.03.015 ↗
25. 10.1002/ente.20140215510.1002/ente.201402155 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.07.01510.1016/j.nanoen.2017.07.015 ↗
27. 10.1126/science.121882910.1126/science.1218829 ↗
28. 10.1002/aenm.20130169210.1002/aenm.201301692 ↗
29. 10.1021/am401303810.1021/am4013038 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.501703010.1063/1.5017030 ↗
31. 10.1002/adfm.20050042010.1002/adfm.200500420 ↗
32. 10.1039/C7PY00497D10.1039/C7PY00497D ↗
33. 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.04.01610.1016/j.orgel.2017.04.016 ↗