journal article·2018-12Open access

A Flexible Strategy to Fabricate Gradient Plasmonic Nanostructures

Bin Ai, Steven Larson, Layne Bradley, Yiping Zhao

Advanced Materials Interfaces· Volume 5· Issue 24

Abstract

Abstract Gradient plasmonic nanostructures are produced by a straightforward and powerful fabrication strategy—deposition on curved nanomask (DCNM), a physical vapor deposition on a curved mask substrate covered with a monolayer of close‐packed nanospheres. The feasibility of the DCNM strategy is demonstrated by producing well‐ordered Ag gradient single/double nanotriangle (NT) arrays with continuously adjustable color, extinction, localized surface plasmon resonance wavelength, and surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS). The plasmonic property and the structure gradient are controlled by the size of the mask and the curvature of the curved substrate, as well as the deposition configuration. A plasmonic library of the single/double NT arrays is easily established in a single fabrication. The DCNM strategy can in principle produce a wide range of gradient nanostructures and further be used for flexible components in optical devices, tunable plasmonic SERS sensors, as well as high‐throughput screening of nanostructures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications · Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Georgia Athens GA 30602 USA

Funding

National Science Foundation

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/anie.20131034910.1002/anie.201310349 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.122845610.1126/science.1228456 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.106395110.1126/science.1063951 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.256.5063.153910.1126/science.256.5063.1539 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.291.5504.63310.1126/science.291.5504.633 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.288.5471.162410.1126/science.288.5471.1624 ↗
7. 10.1021/nl070005v10.1021/nl070005v ↗
8. 10.1021/nn900991r10.1021/nn900991r ↗
9. 10.1038/nchem.100510.1038/nchem.1005 ↗
10. 10.1038/lsa.2014.4810.1038/lsa.2014.48 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.20542810.1103/PhysRevB.84.205428 ↗
12. 10.1126/science.123200910.1126/science.1232009 ↗
13. 10.1021/nl304761m10.1021/nl304761m ↗
14. W.Lee Y.Oh J.‐R.Choi K.Kim D.Kim presented atSPIE BiOS San Francisco CA USA February2015.
15. 10.1039/C7NR01505D10.1039/C7NR01505D ↗
16. 10.1038/nnano.2012.5110.1038/nnano.2012.51 ↗
17. 10.1021/cr100267210.1021/cr1002672 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.435710.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4357 ↗
19. 10.1038/nnano.2014.31110.1038/nnano.2014.311 ↗
20. 10.1021/co200007w10.1021/co200007w ↗
21. 10.1039/b715466f10.1039/b715466f ↗
22. 10.1007/0-387-37825-110.1007/0-387-37825-1 ↗
23. 10.1039/C2CS35367A10.1039/C2CS35367A ↗
24. 10.1021/cr200061k10.1021/cr200061k ↗
25. S.Derenko R.Wuchrer A.Sarangan C.Schuster T.Härtling presented atSPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring San Diego CA USA April2013.
26. 10.1021/nn503493c10.1021/nn503493c ↗
27. 10.1002/adma.20160011210.1002/adma.201600112 ↗
28. 10.1002/admi.20160027110.1002/admi.201600271 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0689610.1021/acs.jpcc.5b06896 ↗
30. 10.1021/nl403668710.1021/nl4036687 ↗
31. 10.1021/jp01357010.1021/jp013570 ↗
32. 10.1021/nn203177s10.1021/nn203177s ↗
33. 10.1021/la202778510.1021/la2027785 ↗
34. 10.1126/science.106654110.1126/science.1066541 ↗
35. Bohren C. F. · 2008
36. 10.1063/1.204663310.1063/1.2046633 ↗
37. 10.1021/jp002435e10.1021/jp002435e ↗
38. 10.1002/jrs.92810.1002/jrs.928 ↗
39. 10.1039/C4RA09251A10.1039/C4RA09251A ↗
40. 10.1021/jp302651x10.1021/jp302651x ↗
41. 10.1021/jp310846j10.1021/jp310846j ↗
42. 10.1021/nl061286u10.1021/nl061286u ↗
43. 10.1021/jp010657m10.1021/jp010657m ↗