Poly(ethylene terephthalate) Fibers with a Thin Layer of Click‐Based Microporous Organic Network: Enhanced Capture Performance toward PM2.5
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This work shows that the adsorptive performance of fibrous membrane can be enhanced by microporous organic network (MON) chemistry. Copper species are introduced into the surface of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) fibers through electroless deposition. Through the Cu2O‐catalyzed click reactions of tetra(4‐ethynylphenyl)methane with 1,4‐diazidobenzene, click‐based MON (C‐MON) layers are formed on the PET@Cu@Cu2O. Etching of copper species results in the formation of PET@C‐MON membranes that show enhanced removal performance by up to 13.3 times for particulate matters with smaller sizes than 2.5 µm (PM2.5), compared with pristine PET fibers.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Membrane Separation and Gas Transport
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry Sungkyunkwan University Suwon 16419 Korea
Laboratory of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance The National Center for Inter‐University Research Facilities (NCIRF) Seoul National University Seoul 08826 Korea
Korea Basic Science Institute Daejeon 34133 Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea · Ministry of Science ICT and Future Planning · National Research Council of Science and Technology
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b0006710.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00067 ↗
2. 10.1021/cr500616710.1021/cr5006167 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.01.11010.1016/j.cej.2018.01.110 ↗
4. 10.1039/C5EW00159E10.1039/C5EW00159E ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0077110.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00771 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsami.6b0533910.1021/acsami.6b05339 ↗
7. 10.1039/C6RA12320A10.1039/C6RA12320A ↗
8. 10.1039/C6RA14952A10.1039/C6RA14952A ↗
9. 10.1021/ma300121k10.1021/ma300121k ↗
10. 10.1039/C7TA08210J10.1039/C7TA08210J ↗
11. 10.1039/C6EN00696E10.1039/C6EN00696E ↗
12. 10.1039/C6TA00977H10.1039/C6TA00977H ↗
13. 10.1021/jacs.6b0255310.1021/jacs.6b02553 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.cej.2016.07.05510.1016/j.cej.2016.07.055 ↗
15. 10.1021/ja411263h10.1021/ja411263h ↗
16. 10.1021/ja500362w10.1021/ja500362w ↗
17. 10.1021/acsami.7b1265310.1021/acsami.7b12653 ↗
18. 10.1039/C7CS00071E10.1039/C7CS00071E ↗
19. 10.1039/C6CS00851H10.1039/C6CS00851H ↗
20. 10.1039/c3cs60160a10.1039/c3cs60160a ↗
21. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.09.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.09.002 ↗
22. 10.1039/c2ee22002d10.1039/c2ee22002d ↗
23. 10.1021/cr200440z10.1021/cr200440z ↗
24. 10.1002/anie.20070387110.1002/anie.200703871 ↗
25. 10.1002/anie.20070469710.1002/anie.200704697 ↗
26. 10.1039/b600349d10.1039/b600349d ↗
27. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b0383610.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03836 ↗
28. 10.1039/C6CC10005H10.1039/C6CC10005H ↗
29. 10.1039/C5SC04351D10.1039/C5SC04351D ↗
30. 10.1021/cs501731w10.1021/cs501731w ↗
31. 10.1039/c1nj20370c10.1039/c1nj20370c ↗
32. 10.1039/c0jm03483e10.1039/c0jm03483e ↗
33. 10.1021/ma101677t10.1021/ma101677t ↗
34. 10.1021/am301654j10.1021/am301654j ↗
35. 10.1039/C4NR02076F10.1039/C4NR02076F ↗
36. 10.1021/ma802394x10.1021/ma802394x ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2011.05.01310.1016/j.jorganchem.2011.05.013 ↗
38. 10.1002/1439-2054(20011001)286:10<640::AID-MAME640>3.0.CO;2-110.1002/1439-2054(20011001)286:10<640::AID-MAME640>3.0.CO;2-1 ↗
39. 10.1039/C4TA06191H10.1039/C4TA06191H ↗
40. 10.1021/es981277q10.1021/es981277q ↗
41. In our experimental conditions (PM2.5: 464 ± 16 µg m−3 air flow rate: 7.5 L min−1) the commercial car air filter (Fouring Co.) with a thickness of ≈0.34 mm showed a RE of 87%. The air pressure drop was measured as 40 ± 5 Pa at a flow rate of 1 L min−1. In contrast the PET@MON‐3 membrane with a thickness of 0.1 mm showed a RE of 80–83%. The air pressure drop was measured as 9 ± 2 Pa at a flow rate of 1 L min−1.