Thermochemical degradation of cotton fabric under mild conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Textile waste presents a major burden on the environment, contributing to climate change and chemical pollution as toxic dyes and finishing chemicals enter the environment through landfill leachate. Moreover, the majority of textile waste reaching landfills is discarded clothing, which could be reused or recycled. Here we investigate environmentally benign morphology changing of cotton textiles as a precursor for reintegration into a circular materials economy. At 50 °C using low concentrations of acids and bases, the interfiber structures of woven cotton were successfully degraded when treated with the following sequence of chemical treatment: citric acid, urea, sodium hydroxide, ammonium hydroxide, and sodium nitrate. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Raman spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) reveal separation of the constituent fibers without depolymerization of the cellulose structure, and streaming potential measurements indicate that surface charge effects play a key role in facilitating degradation. The proposed reaction procedures show feasibility of effective waste-fabric recycling processes without chemically intensive processes, in which staple fibers are recovered and can be re-spun into new textiles.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers · Textile materials and evaluations · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Allesch, A., & Brunner, P. H. (2014). Assessment methods for solid waste management: A literature review. Waste Management and Research, 32, 461–473.10.1177/0734242X14535653 ↗
2. Awada, H., Montplaisir, D., & Daneault, C. (2012). Growth of polyelectrolyte on lignocellulosic fibres: Study by ζ-potential, FTIR, and XPS. BioResources, 7, 2090–2104.10.15376/biores.7.2.2090-2104 ↗
3. Bird, J. (2018, September 9). Fashion’s dirty little secret and how it's coming clean. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonbird1/2018/09/09/fashions-dirty-little-secret-and-how-its-coming-clean/#5e42089a1771
4. Blackwell, J., Vasko, P. D., & Koenig, J. L. (1970). Infrared and Raman spectra of the cellulose from the cell wall of valonia ventricosa. Journal of Applied Physics, 41, 4375–4379.10.1063/1.1658470 ↗
5. Briggs, D., & Seah, M. P. (1993). Practical surface analysis. John Wiley and Sons.
6. Cai, J., & Zhang, L. (2005). Rapid dissolution of cellulose in LiOH/Urea and NaOH/Urea aqueous solutions. Macromolecular Bioscience, 5, 539–548.10.1002/mabi.200400222 ↗
7. Chan, X., Nan, W., Mahajan, D., & Kim, T. (2015). Comprehensive investigation of the biomass derived furfuryl alcohol oligomer formation over tungsten oxide catalysts. Catalysis Communications, 72, 11–15.10.1016/j.catcom.2015.08.027 ↗
8. Chung, C., Lee, M., & Choe, E. K. (2004). Chracterization of cotton fabric scouring by FT-IR ATR spectroscopy. Carbohydrate Polymers, 58, 417–420.10.1016/j.carbpol.2004.08.005 ↗
9. De Silva, R., & Byrne, N. (2017). Utilization of cotton waste for regenerated cellulose fibres: Influence of degree of polymerization on mechanical properties. Carbohydrate Polymers, 174, 89–94.10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.042 ↗
10. Deschamps, M. (1998). Shredding apparatus with shearing action (US Patent 5,829,690). U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=5829690
11. Edwards, H. G. M., Farwell, D. W., & Williams, A. C. (1994). FT-Raman spectrum of cotton: A polymeric biomolecular analysis. Spectrochimica Acta., 50A, 807–811.10.1016/0584-8539(94)80016-2 ↗
12. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2017). A new textiles economy: Redesigning fashion’s future, https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/A-New-Textiles-Economy_Full-Report_Updated_1-12-17.pdf.
13. Environmental Protection Agency. Facts and Figures about Materials, Waste and Recycling, Textiles: Material-Specific Data, https://www.epa.gov/facts-and-figures-about-materials-waste-and-recycling/textiles-material-specific-data.
14. Ershova, O., da Costa, E. V., Fernandes, A. J. S., Domingues, M. R., Evtuguin, D. V., & Sixta, H. (2012). Effect of urea on cellulose degradation under conditions of alkaline pulping. Cellulose, 19, 2195–2204.10.1007/s10570-012-9791-4 ↗
15. Fairbrother, F., & Harold, M. (1924). CCCXII-Studies in electro-endosmosis. Part I. Journal of the Chemical Society, Transactions, 125, 2319–2330.10.1039/CT9242502319 ↗
16. Flynn, S., & Stanev, C. (2016). Methods and systems for processing cellulose-containing materials and isolating cellulose molecules: Methods for regenerating cellulosic fibers (U.S. Patent No. 0369456 A1). U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PG01&s1=20160369456.PGNR.
17. Gavillon, R., & Budtova, T. (2008). Aerocellulose: New highly porous cellulose prepared from cellulose-NaOH aqueous solutions. Biomacromolecules, 9, 269–277.10.1021/bm700972k ↗
18. Halada, G. P., & Clayton, C. R. (1993). Comparison of Mo-N and W-N synergism during passivation of stainless steel through X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and electrochemical analysis. Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology A, 11, 2342–2347.10.1116/1.578373 ↗
19. Imtiazuddin, S. M., Mumtaz, M., & Mallick, K. A. (2012). Pollutants of wastewater characteristics in textile industry. Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 8, 554–556.10.6000/1927-5129.2012.08.02.47 ↗
20. Isogai, A., & Atalla, R. H. (1998). Dissolution of cellulose in aqueous NaOH solutions. Cellulose, 5, 309–319.10.1023/A:1009272632367 ↗
21. Jin, H., Zha, C., & Gu, L. (2007). Direct dissolution of cellulose in NaOH/thiourea/urea aqueous solution. Carbohydrate Research, 342, 851–858.10.1016/j.carres.2006.12.023 ↗
22. Kamlangkla, K., Paosawatyanyong, B., Pavarajarn, V., Hodak, J. H., & Hodak, S. K. (2010). Mechanical strength and hydrophobicity of cotton fabric after SF6 plasma treatment. Applied Surface Science, 256, 5888–5897.10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.03.070 ↗
23. Luxbacher, T., Čurlin, M., & Petrinić, I. (2014). Assessing the quality of raw cotton knitted fabrics by their streaming potential coefficients. Cellulose, 21, 3829–3839.10.1007/s10570-014-0388-y ↗
24. Ma, Y., Zeng, B., Wang, X., & Byrne, N. (2019). Circular textiles: closed loop fiber to fiber wet spun process for recycling cotton from denim. ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering, 7, 11937–11943.
25. Mansfield, S. D., Mooney, C., & Saddler, J. N. (1999). Substrate and enzyme characteristics that limit cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnology Progress, 15, 804–816.10.1021/bp9900864 ↗
26. Matuana, L. M., Balatinecz, J. J., Sodhi, R. N. S., & Park, C. B. (2001). Surface characterization of esterified cellulosic fibers by XPS and FTIR spectroscopy. Wood Science and Technology, 35, 191–201.10.1007/s002260100097 ↗
27. McSweeny, J. D., Rowell, R. M., & Min, S. H. (2006). Effect of citric acid modification of aspen wood on sorption of copper ion. Journal of Natural Fibers, 3, 43–58.10.1300/J395v03n01_05 ↗
28. Micklin, P. (2007). The aral sea disaster. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 35, 47–72.10.1146/annurev.earth.35.031306.140120 ↗
29. Moigne, N. L., & Navard, P. (2010). Dissolution mechanisms of wood cellulose fibres in NaOH-water. Cellulose, 17, 31–45.10.1007/s10570-009-9370-5 ↗
30. Notman, N. (2020, January 27). Recycling clothing the chemical ways. Chemistry world. https://www.chemistryworld.com/features/recycling-clothing-the-chemical-way/4010988.article
31. Oh, S. Y., Yoo, D. I., Shin, Y., & Seo, G. (2005). FTIR analysis of cellulose treated with sodium hydroxide and carbon dioxide. Carbohydrate Research, 340, 417–428.10.1016/j.carres.2004.11.027 ↗
32. Paleckiene, R., Sviklas, A., & Šlinkšiene, R. (2005). Reaction of Urea with Citric Acid. Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry, 78, 1651–1655.10.1007/s11167-005-0579-2 ↗
33. Rowe, R.G. (2000). Textile recycling machine (U.S. Patent No. 6,061,876). U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=6061876.
34. Sandn, G., & Peters, G. M. (2018). Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling—a review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 353–365.10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.266 ↗
35. Savutsky, A., & Golay, M. J. E. (1964). Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Analytical Chemistry, 36, 1627–1639.10.1021/ac60214a047 ↗
36. Sferrazza, R.A., Handermann, A.C., Atwell, C.H., & Yamamoto, D.K. (1996). Carpet recycling process and system (U.S. Patent No. 5,535,945). U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=5535945.
37. Thanh, N.D., & Nhung, H.L. (2009). Cellulose modified with citric acid and its absorption of Pb2+ and Cd2+ ions. In: The 13th International Electronic Conference on Synthetic Organic Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-13-00231.10.3390/ecsoc-13-00231 ↗
38. Turner, D. A., Williams, I. S., & Kemp, S. (2015). Greenhouse gas emission factors for recycling of source-segregated waste material. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 105, 186–197.10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.10.026 ↗
39. Wang, Y., Zhao, Y., & Deng, Y. (2008). Effect of enzymatic treatment on cotton fiber dissolution in NaOH/urea solution at cold temperature. Carbohydrate Polymers, 72, 178–184.10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.08.003 ↗
40. Warwicker, J. O. (1969). Swelling of cotton in alkalis and acids. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 13, 41–54.10.1002/app.1969.070130106 ↗
41. Wicker, A. (2016, September 1). Fast fashion is creating an environmental crisis. Newsweek. https://www.newsweek.com/2016/09/09/old-clothes-fashion-waste-crisis-494824.html.
42. Xiong, B., Zhao, P., Hu, K., Zhang, L., & Cheng, G. (2014). Dissolution of cellulose in aqueous NaOH/urea solution: Role of urea. Cellulose, 21, 1183–1192.10.1007/s10570-014-0221-7 ↗
43. Ye, T., Wang, B., Liu, J., Chen, J., & Yang, Y. (2015). Quantitative analysis of citric acid/sodium hypophosphite modifiedcotton by HPLC and conductometric titration. Carbohydrate Polymers, 121, 92–98.10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.12.028 ↗