Simulation‐Experimental Approach to Investigate the Role of Interfaces in Self‐Replenishing Composite Coatings
Source abstract
Abstract
To investigate self‐replenishing on surface‐structured composite coatings a dual simulation‐experimental approach is employed to study the decisive role of polymer‐air and polymer‐particle interfaces. Experimentally, the composite system consists of a cross‐linked polymer network with fluorinated‐dangling chains, embedding colloidal SiO2 nanoparticles which are incorporated in the network via covalent bonding. These particles provide the desired surface structure at the air‐interface before and after damage. Any damage replicates the rough surface, while the polymer layer on top of the particles serves as source of low surface energy groups which are able to reorient towards the new air‐interfaces. Using coarse‐grained simulations details of these self‐replenishing composite systems are revealed such as the minimum thickness of the polymer layer necessary for providing optimal self‐replenishing ability and the distribution profile of the dangling chains at the various interfaces. The principles and dual approach reported here may be applied to other self‐healing composite systems with applications in self‐cleaning, anti‐fouling or low adhesion materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratory of Materials and Interface Chemistry Dept. of Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Eindhoven University of Technology Den Dolech 2 5600 MB Eindhoven the Netherlands
AkzoNobel, Automotive & Aerospace Coatings Sassenheim the Netherlands
DSM Ahead Geleen the Netherlands
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/b412803f10.1039/b412803f ↗
2. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.04.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.04.003 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20100121510.1002/adma.201001215 ↗
4. 10.1039/b818940d10.1039/b818940d ↗
5. 10.1039/c2ta01073a10.1039/c2ta01073a ↗
6. Ionov L. · PhysChemChemPhys · 2012 · 14 · 10497
7. 10.1002/anie.20100125810.1002/anie.201001258 ↗
8. 10.1002/smll.20070006410.1002/smll.200700064 ↗
9. 10.1021/la204232g10.1021/la204232g ↗
10. 10.1021/am100634m10.1021/am100634m ↗
11. 10.1002/adma.20120080710.1002/adma.201200807 ↗
12. 10.1002/adfm.20130190910.1002/adfm.201301909 ↗
13. 10.1021/ma302236w10.1021/ma302236w ↗
14. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.05.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.05.001 ↗
15. 10.1021/nn201260r10.1021/nn201260r ↗
16. 10.1039/c2sm07009j10.1039/c2sm07009j ↗
17. 10.1039/c1sm05212h10.1039/c1sm05212h ↗
18. Huang K. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2009 · 130
19. 10.1063/1.157480010.1063/1.1574800 ↗
20. 10.1295/polymj.35.51910.1295/polymj.35.519 ↗
21. 10.1016/0021-9797(68)90272-510.1016/0021-9797(68)90272-5 ↗
22. Moulder J. F.
23. 10.1016/S0300-9440(03)00107-310.1016/S0300-9440(03)00107-3 ↗
24. 10.1021/ma035296i10.1021/ma035296i ↗
25. 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.05.01710.1016/j.polymer.2007.05.017 ↗
26. 10.1021/la035307110.1021/la0353071 ↗
27. A. C. C.Esteves K.Lyakhova L. G. J.van der Ven R. A. T. M.van Benthem G.de With unpublished.
28. 10.1039/c2sm07361g10.1039/c2sm07361g ↗
29. 10.1039/c0py00362j10.1039/c0py00362j ↗
30. 10.1021/ma301513s10.1021/ma301513s ↗
31. 10.1021/ma702381t10.1021/ma702381t ↗
32. www.pumma.nl last accessed March 2014.
33. 10.1209/0295-5075/19/3/00110.1209/0295-5075/19/3/001 ↗
34. 10.1209/epl/i1997-00515-810.1209/epl/i1997-00515-8 ↗
35. Molecular Modeling Pro Norgwyn Montgomery Software Inc. 1992.
36. 10.1063/1.274632510.1063/1.2746325 ↗
37. Hildebrand J. H. · 1950
38. 10.1039/c3sm50304f10.1039/c3sm50304f ↗
39. 10.1063/1.148185910.1063/1.1481859 ↗
40. 10.1016/S0927-7757(00)00556-210.1016/S0927-7757(00)00556-2 ↗
41. 10.1021/la00075a00410.1021/la00075a004 ↗
42. 10.1021/jp908324d10.1021/jp908324d ↗
43. Kaçar G. · J. Phys. Chem. · 2013 · 117 · 19038