journal article·2025-11Open access

Copper Stress Response of Antibiotic‐Resistant and Copper‐Tolerant Enterococcus faecium and the Antibacterial Efficacy of Functionalized Copper Surfaces

Franca Arndt, Katharina Siems, Stella Marie Timofeev, Philippe Baumann, Aisha Saddiqa Ahmed, Daniel Wyn Müller, Frank Mücklich, Aaron Haben, Ralf Kautenburger, Ronja Anton, Christoph Schaudinn, Michael Laue, Oliver Schwengers, Katharina Runzheimer, Rocío Arazo del Pino, Kyriaki Xanthopoulou, Paul G. Higgins, Stefan Leuko, Alessa Lalinka Boschert

Advanced Materials Interfaces· Volume 12· Issue 22

Abstract

Abstract The widespread use of antibiotics worldwide has led to an increase in multi‐resistant pathogens, including vancomycin‐resistant enterococci (VRE). To prevent the spread of multi‐resistant pathogens, antimicrobial surfaces have become more widely used. Various metals and surface topographies are researched to optimize their bactericidal effect. Copper surfaces have proven cost‐effective, easy to implement, and safe. However, concurrent metal resistance in Enterococcus faecium , leads to strains highly resistant to both vancomycin and copper. The efficacy of copper coatings are evaluated, and copper and brass surfaces are functionalized with Direct Laser Interference Patterning (DLIP) and determined the release of copper and zinc ions during cell‐surface. Additionally, the copper stress response of five E. faecium isolates is characterized by scanning and transmission electron microscopy, determination of the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) on copper‐infused media, and whole‐genome sequencing. The copper stress responses of the isolates differed due to their different copper resistance genes. In particular, it is shown that prior exposure to vancomycin enhanced copper tolerance in E. faecium . Furthermore, the copper‐tolerant isolate is the only one to survive direct contact with the functionalized copper surface. These results highlight the importance of investigating antimicrobial and functionalized surfaces against hospital pathogens and co‐resistance against metal and antibiotics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus · Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing · Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Applied Aerospace Biology Institute of Aerospace Medicine German Aerospace Center Linder Hoehe 51147 Cologne Germany

Institute for Medical Microbiology Immunology and Hygiene University Hospital of Cologne Goldenfelsstr. 19 50935 Cologne Germany

Chair of Functional Materials Department of Materials Science Saarland University Campus, D3.3 66123 Saarbrücken Germany

Department of Inorganic Solid State Chemistry Elemental Analysis Saarland University Campus C4.1 66123 Saarbrücken Germany

Institute for Frontier Materials on Earth and in Space German Aerospace Center (DLR) Linder Hoehe 51147 Cologne Germany

Advanced Light and Electron Microscopy (ZBS4) Robert Koch Institute Seestr. 10 13353 Berlin Germany

Bioinformatics and Systems Biology Justus Liebig University Giessen Ludwigsplatz 13‐15 35390 Gießen Germany

Institute for Medical Microbiology Immunology and Hygiene Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne University of Cologne Goldenfelsstr. 19 50935 Cologne Germany

German Center for Infection Research Partner site Bonn‐Cologne Kerpener Str. 62 50937 Cologne Germany

MVZ Laboratory Dr. Limbach & Colleagues eGbR Im Breitspiel 16 69126 Heidelberg Germany

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1086/59501110.1086/595011 ↗
2. Zhen X. M. · Antimicrob. Resist. In. · 2019 · 8 · 137
3. 10.3390/bacteria302000610.3390/bacteria3020006 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.micpath.2022.10596310.1016/j.micpath.2022.105963 ↗
5. 10.1007/BF0317561310.1007/BF03175613 ↗
6. 10.1002/admi.20200165610.1002/admi.202001656 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.08.01810.1016/j.jhin.2009.08.018 ↗
8. 10.1001/archinte.165.3.30210.1001/archinte.165.3.302 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.01.02310.1016/j.jhin.2024.01.023 ↗
10. 10.3390/ma1112247910.3390/ma11122479 ↗
11. 10.1128/AEM.01279-2010.1128/AEM.01279-20 ↗
12. 10.1086/67020710.1086/670207 ↗
13. 10.3390/ma1413344410.3390/ma14133444 ↗
14. 10.1128/AEM.00597-1110.1128/AEM.00597-11 ↗
15. 10.1128/AEM.02766-1010.1128/AEM.02766-10 ↗
16. 10.1073/pnas.081280810610.1073/pnas.0812808106 ↗
17. 10.1089/ast.2016.162010.1089/ast.2016.1620 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41598-018-28454-210.1038/s41598-018-28454-2 ↗
19. 10.3389/frspt.2021.77324410.3389/frspt.2021.773244 ↗
20. 10.1002/admi.20240085210.1002/admi.202400852 ↗
21. 10.1186/s13568-022-01491-x10.1186/s13568-022-01491-x ↗
22. 10.1016/j.lssr.2020.05.00410.1016/j.lssr.2020.05.004 ↗
23. 10.3390/met1105071110.3390/met11050711 ↗
24. 10.1016/B978-0-8155-2037-5.00012-510.1016/B978-0-8155-2037-5.00012-5 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsami.9b1781510.1021/acsami.9b17815 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.14754810.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147548 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.10.11410.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.10.114 ↗
28. 10.1038/ismej.2016.15510.1038/ismej.2016.155 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.02.07310.1016/j.envpol.2018.02.073 ↗
30. 10.1093/jac/dkt28910.1093/jac/dkt289 ↗
31. 10.1007/s12275-017-6241-x10.1007/s12275-017-6241-x ↗
32. European Food Safety Authority. EFSA reviews maximum content of copper in feed for piglets 2016 https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/press/news/160809‐0(accessed Sept 1 2025).
33. European Commission. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1039 of 23 July 2018 concerning the authorisation of Copper(II) diacetate monohydrate as feed additives for all animal species. Off J Eur Union L186: 3–24 2018.
34. 10.1128/AAC.46.5.1410-1416.200210.1128/AAC.46.5.1410-1416.2002 ↗
35. 10.1128/AEM.00364-1110.1128/AEM.00364-11 ↗
36. 10.1128/AEM.02979-0510.1128/AEM.02979-05 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0168-6445(03)00053-610.1016/S0168-6445(03)00053-6 ↗
38. 10.3402/iee.v2i0.1695910.3402/iee.v2i0.16959 ↗
39. 10.1093/jac/dkt47910.1093/jac/dkt479 ↗
40. 10.1038/s41598-020-60592-410.1038/s41598-020-60592-4 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.mtadv.2025.10059610.1016/j.mtadv.2025.100596 ↗
42. 10.1590/S1516-1439200700010000410.1590/S1516-14392007000100004 ↗
43. 10.1205/fbp0603510.1205/fbp06035 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2019.10595410.1016/j.optlastec.2019.105954 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.01.01810.1016/j.jhin.2018.01.018 ↗
46. 10.1039/C6BM00078A10.1039/C6BM00078A ↗
47. 10.1016/j.bioadv.2025.21418410.1016/j.bioadv.2025.214184 ↗
48. 10.1007/s00253-010-2980-x10.1007/s00253-010-2980-x ↗
49. 10.1007/s10565-013-9262-110.1007/s10565-013-9262-1 ↗
50. 10.1002/jsfa.970810.1002/jsfa.9708 ↗
51. Ramsey M. · 2014
52. 10.1016/j.sdentj.2018.06.00310.1016/j.sdentj.2018.06.003 ↗
53. 10.1007/s40820-015-0040-x10.1007/s40820-015-0040-x ↗
54. 10.2351/1.490647710.2351/1.4906477 ↗
55. 10.3389/fmats.2024.139793710.3389/fmats.2024.1397937 ↗
56. 10.1021/acsami.3c0480110.1021/acsami.3c04801 ↗
57. Luo J. Q. · Micron · 2019 · 127
58. Montero D. A. · Antimicrob Resist In · 2019 · 8 · 3
59. 10.1007/s42243-023-01029-w10.1007/s42243-023-01029-w ↗
60. 10.1016/j.jcis.2024.04.21210.1016/j.jcis.2024.04.212 ↗
61. Ganapathi A. · Int. J. Sci. Eng. Applicat. · 2013
62. 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-12410.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-124 ↗
63. 10.1007/s11274-024-04076-x10.1007/s11274-024-04076-x ↗
64. 10.1111/1574-6968.1234110.1111/1574-6968.12341 ↗
65. 10.13005/bpj/32010.13005/bpj/320 ↗
66. 10.1128/JB.01354-1310.1128/JB.01354-13 ↗
67. 10.1099/mic.0.066928-010.1099/mic.0.066928-0 ↗
68. Chaturvedi K. S. · Front. Cellul. Infect. Microbiol. · 2014 · 4
69. 10.1128/AEM.01725-1510.1128/AEM.01725-15 ↗
70. 10.1093/jac/dkv33010.1093/jac/dkv330 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.nmni.2015.11.00610.1016/j.nmni.2015.11.006 ↗
72. 10.1099/jmm.0.00034810.1099/jmm.0.000348 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.tim.2018.04.00810.1016/j.tim.2018.04.008 ↗
74. 10.1073/pnas.180928511510.1073/pnas.1809285115 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.jprot.2018.05.01710.1016/j.jprot.2018.05.017 ↗
76. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.tb18862.x10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.tb18862.x ↗
77. 10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0044-201810.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0044-2018 ↗
78. 10.1007/s00018-016-2302-210.1007/s00018-016-2302-2 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.12.00210.1016/j.cmi.2023.12.002 ↗
80. 10.1128/AAC.45.2.375-381.200110.1128/AAC.45.2.375-381.2001 ↗
81. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2024.29.23.230063310.2807/1560-7917.ES.2024.29.23.2300633 ↗
82. Werner G. · Drug Resist Update · 2020 · 53
83. 10.1039/c3mt00288h10.1039/c3mt00288h ↗
84. Schaik W. · BMC Genomics · 2010 · 11
85. 10.1186/s40793-015-0021-110.1186/s40793-015-0021-1 ↗
86. 10.1038/s41598-021-94213-510.1038/s41598-021-94213-5 ↗
87. 10.1007/s10096-018-3209-710.1007/s10096-018-3209-7 ↗
88. 10.1128/genomeA.01553-1610.1128/genomeA.01553-16 ↗
89. 10.1128/JCM.01750-1010.1128/JCM.01750-10 ↗
90. 10.1128/microbiolspec.ARBA-0032-201810.1128/microbiolspec.ARBA-0032-2018 ↗
91. 10.3389/fmicb.2025.165982810.3389/fmicb.2025.1659828 ↗
92. 10.1111/1365-2664.1432210.1111/1365-2664.14322 ↗
93. J.O'Neill Review on Antimicrobial Resistance. Antimicrobial Resistance: Tackling a Crisis for the Health and Wealth of Nations.: Review on Antimicrobial Resistance 2014.
94. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c0162510.1021/acs.langmuir.0c01625 ↗
95. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2024.16033810.1016/j.apsusc.2024.160338 ↗
96. 10.1515/pm-2021-003110.1515/pm-2021-0031 ↗
97. 10.1038/s41526-024-00447-810.1038/s41526-024-00447-8 ↗
98. 10.1128/JCM.02046-1510.1128/JCM.02046-15 ↗
99. 10.1128/AEM.03608-1210.1128/AEM.03608-12 ↗
100. 10.1002/imt2.10710.1002/imt2.107 ↗