Harnessing the Potential of Dip‐Pen Nanolithography to Pattern Meta‐Chemical Surfaces with Glutathione Inks: An Electrochemical Sensor for Pb(II) and Hg(II)
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Traditional methods are complex and unsuitable for on‐site detection of heavy metals, which become ubiquitous in groundwater contamination. This research introduces a novel approach for creating meta‐chemical surfaces using dip‐pen nanolithography with glutathione‐based ink, which can be used as an affordable and portable electrochemical sensor. The sensitivity, which is quantified by LoD value (0.84 ppb and 0.99 ppb for Pb(II) and Hg(II), respectively), is influenced by the exposed gold surface, the pattern pitch, and the binding strength between the ligand and the cations. The results indicate that the LoD values are almost unaffected by the presence of the two cations in solution, which can be explained by DFT calculations. In addition to the efficient sensor developed in this study, the finding that the pattern pitch affects the fill factor, which in turn affects the sensor's sensitivity, is significant and novel. Thus, the sensor's sensitivity can be regulated by altering the pattern pitch, which has far‐reaching implications in the field of sensing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry Ben‐Gurion University of the Negev Be'er‐Sheva 8410501 Israel
Analytical Chemistry Department Nuclear Research Center Negev, P.O.B. 9001 Be'er‐Sheva 8419001 Israel
Department of Chemical Engineering Sami Shamoon College of Engineering Be'er‐Sheva 8410802 Israel
Chemical Sciences Department Ariel University Ariel 4070000 Israel
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering Sami Shamoon College of Engineering Be'er‐Sheva 8410802 Israel
Funding
Israel Innovation Authority
References (81)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/wer.130710.1002/wer.1307 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.clwas.2022.10004210.1016/j.clwas.2022.100042 ↗
3. 10.3923/jest.2016.301.31610.3923/jest.2016.301.316 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.11117810.1016/j.enpol.2019.111178 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10854-020-05048-110.1007/s10854-020-05048-1 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jece.2022.10759810.1016/j.jece.2022.107598 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41598-020-65359-510.1038/s41598-020-65359-5 ↗
8. 10.3390/pr806064510.3390/pr8060645 ↗
9. 10.1021/nn406571t10.1021/nn406571t ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jtemb.2019.05.00310.1016/j.jtemb.2019.05.003 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.bios.2017.03.03110.1016/j.bios.2017.03.031 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.snb.2015.02.12210.1016/j.snb.2015.02.122 ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20200822710.1002/adfm.202008227 ↗
14. “Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ” can be found underhttps://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/spl/index.html (accessed: 2024)
15. 2017
16. 10.1002/adfm.20200616810.1002/adfm.202006168 ↗
17. 10.3390/app1308476410.3390/app13084764 ↗
18. 10.1002/cben.20210005310.1002/cben.202100053 ↗
19. 10.1039/C7NJ04559J10.1039/C7NJ04559J ↗
20. 10.1016/j.talanta.2017.07.04310.1016/j.talanta.2017.07.043 ↗
21. 10.1002/ansa.20220000310.1002/ansa.202200003 ↗
22. 10.1021/nn401373710.1021/nn4013737 ↗
23. 10.1021/acssensors.7b0049610.1021/acssensors.7b00496 ↗
24. 10.1021/acssensors.0c0179310.1021/acssensors.0c01793 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.04.04410.1016/j.electacta.2012.04.044 ↗
26. 10.1002/admt.20210076010.1002/admt.202100760 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.10330310.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103303 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2019.03.02510.1016/j.jelechem.2019.03.025 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.snb.2019.12663210.1016/j.snb.2019.126632 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.02410.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.024 ↗
31. 10.1109/JSEN.2016.257218410.1109/JSEN.2016.2572184 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.inoche.2020.10791110.1016/j.inoche.2020.107911 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0158310.1021/acsnano.8b01583 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2019.04.00510.1016/j.jelechem.2019.04.005 ↗
35. 10.1038/srep3312510.1038/srep33125 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13563910.1016/j.cej.2022.135639 ↗
37. 10.1002/celc.20230042410.1002/celc.202300424 ↗
38. 10.1002/smtd.20230111810.1002/smtd.202301118 ↗
39. 10.1002/smsc.20240045910.1002/smsc.202400459 ↗
40. 10.1002/smtd.20240215710.1002/smtd.202402157 ↗
41. 10.3390/molecules2512293710.3390/molecules25122937 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.07.06310.1016/j.snb.2018.07.063 ↗
43. 10.1039/D1RA01294K10.1039/D1RA01294K ↗
44. 10.18388/abp.1999_412910.18388/abp.1999_4129 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.talanta.2016.04.01110.1016/j.talanta.2016.04.011 ↗
46. 10.1021/acsnano.2c0331010.1021/acsnano.2c03310 ↗
47. 10.1038/s41563-023-01561-w10.1038/s41563-023-01561-w ↗
48. 10.1126/science.283.5402.66110.1126/science.283.5402.661 ↗
49. 10.1002/mame.20170005310.1002/mame.201700053 ↗
50. 10.1002/1521-4095(20021016)14:20<1474::AID-ADMA1474>3.0.CO;2-210.1002/1521-4095(20021016)14:20<1474::AID-ADMA1474>3.0.CO;2-2 ↗
51. 10.1038/nmeth.f.30910.1038/nmeth.f.309 ↗
52. 10.1038/ncomms697710.1038/ncomms6977 ↗
53. 10.1007/s12540-019-00470-510.1007/s12540-019-00470-5 ↗
54. 10.1039/C5TC00186B10.1039/C5TC00186B ↗
55. Zhou X. · 2008 · 1
56. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0507110.1021/acsnano.5b05071 ↗
57. 10.1002/admt.20200089710.1002/admt.202000897 ↗
58. 10.1038/nnano.2007.3910.1038/nnano.2007.39 ↗
59. 10.1021/ja100313710.1021/ja1003137 ↗
60. 10.1002/adma.20090237210.1002/adma.200902372 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.11393410.1016/j.jelechem.2020.113934 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.microc.2023.10986510.1016/j.microc.2023.109865 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2015.11.04310.1016/j.jelechem.2015.11.043 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.13459210.1016/j.electacta.2019.134592 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.10.11410.1016/j.electacta.2015.10.114 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.cej.2015.09.01310.1016/j.cej.2015.09.013 ↗
67. 10.1016/S0162-0134(00)80200-710.1016/S0162-0134(00)80200-7 ↗
68. 10.1021/tx100260e10.1021/tx100260e ↗
69. 10.1002/cmdc.20220015210.1002/cmdc.202200152 ↗
70. 10.1007/s10867-014-9350-310.1007/s10867-014-9350-3 ↗
71. 10.1364/OME.47163010.1364/OME.471630 ↗
72. 10.1016/S0925-3467(02)00068-X10.1016/S0925-3467(02)00068-X ↗
73. Ibarra J. C. · 2011 · 23
74. M. J.Frisch G. W.Trucks H. B.Schlegel G. E.Scuseria M. A.Robb J. R.Cheeseman G.Scalmani V.Barone G. A.Petersson H.Nakatsuji X.Li M.Caricato A. V.Marenich J.Bloino B. G.Janesko R.Gomperts B.Mennucci H. P.Hratchian J. V.Ortiz A. F.Izmaylov J. L.Sonnenberg D.Williams‐Young F.Ding F.Lipparini F.Egidi J.Goings B.Peng A.Petrone T.Henderson D.Ranasinghe et al. Gaussian 16 Revision B.01 Inc. Wallingford CT Wallingford E.U.A 2016.
75. 10.1063/1.46491310.1063/1.464913 ↗
76. 10.1002/jcc.2175910.1002/jcc.21759 ↗
77. 10.1063/1.43898010.1063/1.438980 ↗
78. Dunning T. H. · 1977 · 1
79. 10.1021/jp810292n10.1021/jp810292n ↗
80. 10.1021/acscatal.5b0005410.1021/acscatal.5b00054 ↗
81. Chemcraft – graphical software for visualization of quantum chemistry computations. Version 1.8 build 682 Chemcraft – graphical software for visualization of quantum chemistry computations. Version 1.8 build 682 2020.