A Dynamic Spike Sorter for Multiscale Nanoelectrode Array Recordings
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract High‐throughput, intracellular electrophysiology is crucial for advancing the understanding of neuronal processing and network dynamics. Nanoelectrode arrays (NEA) offer a promising approach by directly capturing intracellular signals across sub‐neuronal compartments, including action potentials, postsynaptic potentials, and low‐frequency membrane fluctuations. However, the complexity of NEA datasets, characterized by multiscale events of varying amplitude and duration, demands novel analytical strategies. In this work, a dynamic spike sorting pipeline is introduced and designed to isolate, extract, and sort these diverse electrical signals within a landscape of spontaneous electrical behavior. It is obtained estimates of signal attenuation and distortion using a bespoke biophysical circuit simulation designed to match the specific nanoelectrode interface. Based on these observations, bounds are set for filtering and extracting multiscale waveforms, and validated their isolation using pharmacological data. Finally, it is shown that multiscale analysis of spontaneous electrical recordings reveals interrelationships between high frequency events such as action potentials, and low frequency membrane potential fluctuations which may inform models of neuronal network excitability. Advanced sorting algorithms tailored for nanoelectrode array recordings are essential for unlocking the full potential of next generation, high throughput neuroelectronic devices and achieving a deeper understanding of neuronal dynamics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Neuroscience and Neural Engineering · Neural dynamics and brain function · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Shu Chien‐Gene Lay Department of Bioengineering University of California San Diego La Jolla CA 92093 USA
Molecular Neurobiology Laboratory The Salk Institute for Biological Studies La Jolla CA 92037 USA
Aiiso Yufeng Li Family Department of Chemical and Nano Engineering University of California San Diego La Jolla CA 92093 USA
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41551-019-0455-710.1038/s41551-019-0455-7 ↗
2. 10.1038/nn182610.1038/nn1826 ↗
3. 10.1073/pnas.070272710410.1073/pnas.0702727104 ↗
4. 10.3389/fncel.2015.0006710.3389/fncel.2015.00067 ↗
5. 10.1038/nrn214810.1038/nrn2148 ↗
6. 10.1073/pnas.96.9.475910.1073/pnas.96.9.4759 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41386-024-01943-x10.1038/s41386-024-01943-x ↗
8. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2020.05.01510.1016/j.stemcr.2020.05.015 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.nbd.2021.10560910.1016/j.nbd.2021.105609 ↗
10. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0971-23.202410.1523/JNEUROSCI.0971-23.2024 ↗
11. 10.1038/srep2920010.1038/srep29200 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0161-813X(01)00028-610.1016/S0161-813X(01)00028-6 ↗
13. 10.3390/cells1008195310.3390/cells10081953 ↗
14. 10.1038/nn.280310.1038/nn.2803 ↗
15. 10.1186/s13229-020-00351-410.1186/s13229-020-00351-4 ↗
16. 10.7554/eLife.7747010.7554/eLife.77470 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.biosystems.2020.10427810.1016/j.biosystems.2020.104278 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41378-024-00817-y10.1038/s41378-024-00817-y ↗
19. 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.00467.x10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.00467.x ↗
20. 10.1038/s41551‐025‐01352‐510.1038/s41551‐025‐01352‐5 ↗
21. 10.1038/micronano.2016.8010.1038/micronano.2016.80 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41378-023-00533-z10.1038/s41378-023-00533-z ↗
23. 10.1039/c2lc40091j10.1039/c2lc40091j ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b0051910.1021/acs.accounts.7b00519 ↗
25. 10.7554/eLife.6183410.7554/eLife.61834 ↗
26. 10.1152/jn.00339.201810.1152/jn.00339.2018 ↗
27. 10.1152/jn.00047.202110.1152/jn.00047.2021 ↗
28. 10.1088/2516-1091/ac6b9610.1088/2516-1091/ac6b96 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.08.03010.1016/j.neuron.2017.08.030 ↗
30. 10.1038/srep1410010.1038/srep14100 ↗
31. 10.1038/srep2711010.1038/srep27110 ↗
32. 10.1152/jn.00265.201010.1152/jn.00265.2010 ↗
33. 10.1038/nnano.2011.24910.1038/nnano.2011.249 ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0152310.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01523 ↗
35. 10.1002/smll.20220005310.1002/smll.202200053 ↗
36. 10.1002/adma.20241269710.1002/adma.202412697 ↗
37. 10.1038/s41467-024-51390-x10.1038/s41467-024-51390-x ↗
38. 10.1016/j.neucom.2023.12721110.1016/j.neucom.2023.127211 ↗
39. 10.1007/s10827-024-00868-010.1007/s10827-024-00868-0 ↗
40. 10.3389/fcogn.2023.104421610.3389/fcogn.2023.1044216 ↗
41. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.13570310.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135703 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.05.03810.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.05.038 ↗
43. 10.1038/nrn324110.1038/nrn3241 ↗
44. 10.1007/s40820-021-00655-x10.1007/s40820-021-00655-x ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.02.01010.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.02.010 ↗
46. 10.3389/fnmol.2022.97947910.3389/fnmol.2022.979479 ↗
47. 10.1007/s00424-006-0169-z10.1007/s00424-006-0169-z ↗
48. 10.3389/fncel.2013.0008310.3389/fncel.2013.00083 ↗
49. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5371-11.201210.1523/JNEUROSCI.5371-11.2012 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.11746710.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117467 ↗
51. 10.1038/nnano.2012.26510.1038/nnano.2012.265 ↗
52. 10.1002/adfm.20210837810.1002/adfm.202108378 ↗
53. 10.1186/s12951-021-00841-410.1186/s12951-021-00841-4 ↗
54. 10.1039/C9RA08917A10.1039/C9RA08917A ↗
55. Bouyer G. · 2012
56. 10.3390/s2104144810.3390/s21041448 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.mpaic.2019.01.01510.1016/j.mpaic.2019.01.015 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2022.02.00910.1016/j.neuroscience.2022.02.009 ↗
59. 10.3389/fnins.2014.0042310.3389/fnins.2014.00423 ↗
60. 10.3389/fncir.2016.0010110.3389/fncir.2016.00101 ↗
61. 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.13636610.1113/jphysiol.2007.136366 ↗
62. 10.1007/s12551-023-01055-810.1007/s12551-023-01055-8 ↗
63. 10.1039/c004115g10.1039/c004115g ↗
64. 10.1529/biophysj.104.04980910.1529/biophysj.104.049809 ↗
65. 10.3390/mi709016310.3390/mi7090163 ↗
66. 10.1002/admt.20200077010.1002/admt.202000770 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2018.06.01010.1016/j.bioelechem.2018.06.010 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2022.10821610.1016/j.bioelechem.2022.108216 ↗
69. 10.1063/1.504271210.1063/1.5042712 ↗
70. 10.1038/s41556-024-01511-x10.1038/s41556-024-01511-x ↗
71. 10.1038/nnano.2017.9810.1038/nnano.2017.98 ↗
72. 10.1038/s41467-022-30610-210.1038/s41467-022-30610-2 ↗
73. 10.1038/ncomms325210.1038/ncomms3252 ↗
74. 10.1038/s41598-018-28232-010.1038/s41598-018-28232-0 ↗
75. 10.1002/adhm.20210009410.1002/adhm.202100094 ↗
76. 10.1002/sstr.20240031410.1002/sstr.202400314 ↗
77. 10.1002/adbi.20200024810.1002/adbi.202000248 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.05.01810.1016/j.bpj.2009.05.018 ↗
79. 10.1073/pnas.160914211410.1073/pnas.1609142114 ↗
80. 10.1002/adfm.20170301910.1002/adfm.201703019 ↗
81. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0475210.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04752 ↗
82. Jahed Z. · Nat. Commun. · 2024 · 16 · 657
83. 10.1038/s41592-024-02232-710.1038/s41592-024-02232-7 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2015.04.00710.1016/j.brainresbull.2015.04.007 ↗
85. 10.1007/978-1-4757-2847-710.1007/978-1-4757-2847-7 ↗
86. 10.1137/S003614459630139010.1137/S0036144596301390 ↗
87. “A Review of David Gottlieb's Work on the Resolution of the Gibbs Phenomenon | Communications in Computational Physics | Cambridge Core ”https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/communications‐in‐computational‐physics/article/abs/review‐of‐david‐gottliebs‐work‐on‐the‐resolution‐of‐the‐gibbs‐phenomenon/C77B063AC18D2AF7CF7A6A77028C8528.
88. 10.1109/TCT.1968.108286310.1109/TCT.1968.1082863 ↗
89. 10.1038/s41598-019-48456-y10.1038/s41598-019-48456-y ↗
90. D.Edwards F.Sommerhage B.Berry H.Nummer M.Raquet B.Clymer M.Stancescu J. J.Hickman “Comparison of NMDA and AMPA Channel Expression and Function between Embryonic and Adult Neurons Utilizing Microelectrode Array Systems | ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering ”https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00596 2017.10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00596 ↗
91. 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.11178710.1016/j.celrep.2022.111787 ↗
92. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6318-11.201210.1523/JNEUROSCI.6318-11.2012 ↗
93. 10.1038/ncomms1348010.1038/ncomms13480 ↗
94. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1205-13.201410.1523/JNEUROSCI.1205-13.2014 ↗
95. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.10.00210.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.10.002 ↗
96. 10.1002/jnr.2244410.1002/jnr.22444 ↗
97. M. E.Larkum J. J.Zhu B.Sakmann “A new cellular mechanism for coupling inputs arriving at different cortical layers | Nature ”https://www.nature.com/articles/18686.
98. G.Lowe “Inhibition of backpropagating action potentials in mitral cell secondary dendrites – PubMed ”https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12091533/.
99. 10.1038/nn.271810.1038/nn.2718 ↗
100. 10.3389/fncel.2019.0015910.3389/fncel.2019.00159 ↗