journal article·2024-11Open access

Ultra‐Low Grammage Nanocellulose‐Coated Woven Fabric with Improved Aerosol Particulate Filtration Performance

Joanne Li, Tekla Tammelin, Corinne Stone, Mike Dennis, Koon‐Yang Lee

Advanced Materials Interfaces· Volume 11· Issue 33

Abstract

Abstract Developing advanced textiles and fabrics that offer protection against aerosolised chemical and biological hazards is of tremendous interest and is indispensable to the safety of the military personnel. Unfortunately, the extensive protection offered by protective clothing is often accompanied by a reduction in moisture vapour permeability, which increases physiological burden on the user (i.e., transport of sweat away from the body). This study shows that an enhancement in aerosol particulate filtration of a woven textile fabric can be achieved without impeding its water vapour transmission rate through the application of an ultra‐low grammage nanocellulose coating using a simple papermaking approach. Aerosol particulate filtration is realised in the nanocellulose coating through a size‐exclusion mechanism and the filtration efficiency doubled even at a nanocellulose grammage of 0.25 g m−2. As nanocellulose is hygroscopic, water vapour transmission rate remained unchanged compared to the uncoated woven fabric, regardless of the types of nanocellulose coating applied. The work also reports the mechanical robustness of the nanocellulose network fabricated, which is typically the concern in low‐grammage nanofibrous coating.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Material Properties and Processing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Aeronautics and Institute for Molecular Science and Engineering (IMSE) Imperial College London South Kensington Campus London SW7 2AZ UK

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Espoo FI‐02044 Finland

Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (Dstl) Porton Down Salisbury Wiltshire SP4 0JQ UK

Funding

Defence Science and Technology Laboratory

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. Forsberg K. · 2020
2. Stoll T. · 1998 · 202
3. Adanur S. · Indian J. Fibre Text. Res. · 1997 · 22 · 348
4. 10.2174/187652030080101000110.2174/1876520300801010001 ↗
5. 10.1088/1757-899X/744/1/01201110.1088/1757-899X/744/1/012011 ↗
6. Tripathi N. K. · Def. Sci. J. · 2018 · 68 · 83
7. Langston R. D. · CBW Protect. Cloth. · 1992 · 5 · 666
8. 10.1179/2049396714Y.000000005610.1179/2049396714Y.0000000056 ↗
9. Muza S. R. · 2002 · 1084
10. 10.1152/jappl.1991.71.6.213810.1152/jappl.1991.71.6.2138 ↗
11. 10.1007/s10853-009-3874-010.1007/s10853-009-3874-0 ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20200434910.1002/adma.202004349 ↗
13. 10.1002/anie.20100127310.1002/anie.201001273 ↗
14. 10.3389/fceng.2021.73899510.3389/fceng.2021.738995 ↗
15. Weiss C. K. · Front. Chem. · 2020 · 1 · 392
16. 10.3389/fnano.2021.74732910.3389/fnano.2021.747329 ↗
17. Lee K.‐Y. · Langmuir · 2013 · 30 · 2
18. 10.1021/acsanm.8b0126810.1021/acsanm.8b01268 ↗
19. 10.1039/C4CC00467A10.1039/C4CC00467A ↗
20. 10.1002/adhm.20130064110.1002/adhm.201300641 ↗
21. 10.1021/bm800038n10.1021/bm800038n ↗
22. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11884210.1016/j.memsci.2020.118842 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41598-020-67909-310.1038/s41598-020-67909-3 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11804410.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118044 ↗
25. Jalvo B. · Nano · 2021 · 11 · 1752
26. 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.12034110.1016/j.seppur.2021.120341 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.12105710.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121057 ↗
28. 10.3390/membranes1308069410.3390/membranes13080694 ↗
29. 10.1039/D2NJ05452C10.1039/D2NJ05452C ↗
30. 10.3390/polym1202049210.3390/polym12020492 ↗
31. Freitas C. F. · 2023
32. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10684510.1016/j.compositesa.2022.106845 ↗
33. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0416310.1021/acssuschemeng.0c04163 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10758310.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107583 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2014.09.01410.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2014.09.014 ↗
36. 10.1021/am300852a10.1021/am300852a ↗
37. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11687010.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116870 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.08110.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.081 ↗
39. Richardson J. F. · 1991 · 191
40. 10.1007/978-3-030-30259-7_810.1007/978-3-030-30259-7_8 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsami.1c0128610.1021/acsami.1c01286 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10934210.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109342 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.06610.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.066 ↗
44. 10.1002/adfm.20170668010.1002/adfm.201706680 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.04.09410.1016/j.msec.2019.04.094 ↗
46. Schreuder‐Gibson H. L. · J. Adv. Mater. · 2002 · 34 · 44
47. 10.1016/S0927-7757(01)00616-110.1016/S0927-7757(01)00616-1 ↗
48. 10.3390/membranes1009020410.3390/membranes10090204 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.03.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.03.002 ↗
50. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c0061110.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00611 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.02.01610.1016/j.indcrop.2016.02.016 ↗
52. 10.1007/s00226-003-0216-210.1007/s00226-003-0216-2 ↗
53. 10.1039/D1RA04190H10.1039/D1RA04190H ↗
54. 10.1021/acsomega.9b0038810.1021/acsomega.9b00388 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2014.08.01110.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2014.08.011 ↗