journal article·2022-09

Metal Atom Desorption from Organofluorine Surfaces: What Factors Govern Desorption?

Tsuyoshi Tsujioka, Hatsuka Kusaka

Advanced Materials Interfaces· Volume 9· Issue 25
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Metal pattern formation using vacuum evaporation is an essential technology in various fields such as electronics, photonics, and industrial mass production. An application of selective metal deposition, in which a metal pattern can be prepared by maskless vacuum evaporation, based on the phenomenon of metal atom desorption from the organic surface, is expected as a promising method. However, the surface physical properties that govern the desorption of metals have not been fully clarified. In this study, the metal desorption phenomenon in various organofluorine films with a low surface energy is investigated in detail, and the factors governing the desorption are clarified. It is revealed that metal desorption requires not a low total surface energy but rather the London dispersion component of surface energy as small as 20 mJ m−2, and, moreover, that the surface should have fluidity or high molecular mobility. As typical materials having such physical properties, commercially available mold release agents show efficient desorption with respect to many metals having a low intrinsic vapor pressure such as Au, Ag, Cr, and In. Furthermore, 3D integrated deposition is performed as a demonstration of efficient metal desorption. This highly efficient metal desorption phenomenon is applicable to various fields including electronics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies · Fluid Dynamics and Thin Films · Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Division of Math, Sciences, and Information Technology in Education Osaka Kyoiku University 4‐698‐2 Asahigaoka Kashiwara Osaka 582‐8582 Japan

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.123044410.1126/science.1230444 ↗
2. 10.1039/b807080f10.1039/b807080f ↗
3. 10.1021/cr300503r10.1021/cr300503r ↗
4. 10.1038/300341a010.1038/300341a0 ↗
5. 10.1021/cr068020s10.1021/cr068020s ↗
6. 10.1002/anie.20060212610.1002/anie.200602126 ↗
7. 10.1126/science.291.5509.176910.1126/science.291.5509.1769 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.10.00110.1016/j.polymer.2004.10.001 ↗
9. 10.1021/ja802430q10.1021/ja802430q ↗
10. 10.1039/C3TC31770F10.1039/C3TC31770F ↗
11. 10.1002/tcr.20150023510.1002/tcr.201500235 ↗
12. 10.1002/aelm.20180049110.1002/aelm.201800491 ↗
13. 10.1039/C9MH00842J10.1039/C9MH00842J ↗
14. 10.1039/D0TC02803G10.1039/D0TC02803G ↗
15. 10.1002/adfm.20200595910.1002/adfm.202005959 ↗
16. 10.1143/APEX.5.02160110.1143/APEX.5.021601 ↗
17. 10.1002/sdtp.1507310.1002/sdtp.15073 ↗
18. 10.1039/C8TC02162G10.1039/C8TC02162G ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.190310.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1903 ↗
20. 10.1007/s00339-021-04385-010.1007/s00339-021-04385-0 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0169-4332(00)00828-X10.1016/S0169-4332(00)00828-X ↗
22. 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.06.00410.1016/j.memsci.2012.06.004 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.07.01610.1016/j.memsci.2011.07.016 ↗
24. 10.1021/ie50660a00810.1021/ie50660a008 ↗
25. 10.1002/app.1969.07013081510.1002/app.1969.070130815 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41467-019-12093-w10.1038/s41467-019-12093-w ↗
27. 10.1039/c2sm25540e10.1039/c2sm25540e ↗
28. 10.1039/C5SM02157J10.1039/C5SM02157J ↗
29. 10.1016/S0927-796X(01)00039-010.1016/S0927-796X(01)00039-0 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.23610110.1103/PhysRevLett.109.236101 ↗
31. 10.1080/01694243.2016.118524010.1080/01694243.2016.1185240 ↗
32. 10.2494/photopolymer.14.45710.2494/photopolymer.14.457 ↗
33. 10.1021/nl100326q10.1021/nl100326q ↗
34. 10.1002/anie.20046112210.1002/anie.200461122 ↗
35. 10.1023/A:101470720725510.1023/A:1014707207255 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.12.02810.1016/j.polymer.2005.12.028 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.09710.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.097 ↗