Persona/scenario (P/S) toolkit enhancing inclusive fashion design education
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study aimed to address the diversity issue in fashion design education by developing two prototypes for Inclusive Fashion Design (IFD) education. The prototypes were constructed based on the 3C3R model of Project-Based Learning (PBL) and incorporated the Persona/Scenario (P/S) toolkit for IFD. Additionally, the study examined the effectiveness of the FEA (Function, Expressive, and Aesthetics) self-checklist and the P/S toolkit in the IFD process. The experiments involved two design instructors, two teaching assistants, and 12 senior-level students divided into four teams. Thematic analysis was conducted on the interview data collected from the participants. The results revealed that FEA factors were highly considered in both education prototypes, regardless of the presence of the P/S toolkit. Maintaining consistency of the IFD concept throughout each stage of the process was found to be crucial, and the use of the P/S toolkit played a significant role in achieving this consistency. Team communication emerged as an essential factor in IFD education, as team collaboration using the P/S toolkit triggered diverse perspectives on targets, facilitated design expansion, and extended individual competences. Overall, this study contributes to the understanding of the diversity issue in fashion design education and promotes the adoption of the IFD education methodology, emphasizing the significance of consistent concept development, effective toolkits, and team collaboration in achieving inclusive design practices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Persona Design and Applications · Innovative Human-Technology Interaction · Technology Use by Older Adults
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Afacan, Y., & Demirkan, H. (2010). A priority-based approach for satisfying the diverse users’ needs, capabilities and expectations: A universal kitchen design case. Journal of Engineering Design, 21(2–3), 315–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954482090330342310.1080/09544820903303423 ↗
2. Altay, B., Ballice, G., Bengisu, E., Alkan-Korkmaz, S., & Paykoç, E. (2016). Embracing student experience in inclusive design education through learner-centered instruction. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(11), 1123–1141. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2016.115566210.1080/13603116.2016.1155662 ↗
3. Bennett, C. L., & Rosner, D. K. (2019). The promise of empathy: Design, disability, and knowing the other. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–13). https://creativetech.mat.ucsb.edu/readings/promise_of_empathy.pdf10.1145/3290605.3300528 ↗
4. Burns, L. D., Mullet, K. K., & Bryant, N. O. (2016). The business of fashion: Designing, manufacturing, and marketing. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. https://doi.org/10.5040/978150134914010.5040/9781501349140 ↗
5. Carse, B., Thomson, A., & Stansfield, B. (2010). Use of biomechanical data in the Inclusive Design process: Packaging design and the older adult. Journal of Engineering Design, 21(2–3), 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954482090330345610.1080/09544820903303456 ↗
6. Clarkson, J., Coleman, R., Hosking, I., & Waller, S. (2011). Inclusive design toolkit (second ed.) [Web post]. Retrieved from https://www-edc.eng.cam.ac.uk/files/idtoolkit.pdf.
7. Cooper, A. (1999). The Inmates are Running the Asylum. Software-Ergonomie '99: Design von Informationswelten. Stuttgart: B.G.Teubner. ISBN: 3-519-02694-5. pp. 1710.1007/978-3-322-99786-9_1 ↗
8. Dieffenbacher, F. (2020). Fashion thinking: Creative approaches to the design process. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/978135008277910.5040/9781350082779 ↗
9. Dong, H. (2010). Strategies for teaching inclusive design. Journal of Engineering Design, 21(2–3), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954482090326233010.1080/09544820903262330 ↗
10. Falcão, C., & Simões-Borgiani, D. (2016). Inclusive Fashion Design: Interdisciplinary Practice in the Fashion Design Degree Program at SENAC-PE College. In Advances in Design for Inclusion: Proceedings of the AHFE 2016 International Conference on Design for Inclusion, July 27–31, 2016, Walt Disney World®, Florida, USA (pp. 227–234). Springer International Publishing. https://ahfe.org/images/AHFE-programs/AHFE2016_final_program.pdf10.1007/978-3-319-41962-6_20 ↗
11. Feng, Y. (2020). Digital design and realization of fashionable men’s wear in fashion design. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1533, No. 2, p. 022058). IOP Publishing. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1533/2/022058/pdf10.1088/1742-6596/1533/2/022058/pdf ↗
12. Fuglerud, K. S., Schulz, T., Janson, A. L., & Moen, A. (2020). Co-creating persona scenarios with diverse users enriching inclusive design. Universal Access in Human–Computer Interaction. https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/78445/Fuglerud_2020_Co-creating%2Bpersona%2Bscenarios%2Bwith%2Bdiverse%2Busers%2Benriching%2Binclusive%2Bdesign-pr-pp.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y10.1007/978-3-030-49282-3_4 ↗
13. Gallagher, S. A., & Stepien, W. J. (1996). Content acquisition in problem-based learning: Depth versus breadth in American studies. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19(3), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/01623532960190030210.1177/016235329601900302 ↗
14. Hudson, K., & Hwang, C. (2022). Application of 3D Prototyping to Promote Size-Inclusive Design Practices for Plus-Size Apparel. Fashion Practice, 14(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/17569370.2020.180415210.1080/17569370.2020.1804152 ↗
15. Huh, B. M. (2015). A Study on Active Walking Assistance Device of Inclusive Design. A Journal of Brand Design Association of Korea.13(1), 75-84. https://doi.org/10.18852/bdak.2015.13.1.7510.18852/bdak.2015.13.1.75 ↗
16. Hung, W. (2006). The 3C3R model: A conceptual framework for designing problems in PBL. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.100610.7771/1541-5015.1006 ↗
17. Hung, W., Bailey, J. H., & Jonassen, D. H. (2003). Exploring the tensions of problem-based learning: Insights from research. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 95, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.10810.1002/tl.108 ↗
18. Keates, S. (2005). BS 7000–6:2005 Design management systems. Managing inclusive design. Guide. British Standards Institution, London, UK. https://www.academia.edu/2717920/BS_7000_6_2005_Design_management_systems_Part_6_Managing_inclusive_design_by_British_Standards_2005
19. Lamb, J. M., & Kallal, M. J. (1992). A Conceptual Framework for Apparel Design. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 10(2), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X920100020710.1177/0887302X9201000207 ↗
20. Lee, J. (1999). Problem-based learning: a decision model for problem selection. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Problem-Based-Learning%3A-A-Decision-Model-for-Lee/39ad16ac1d92fa0f7640e08e40f18213fab9a031
21. Lee, J. Y. (2021). The practical uses of persona in the product or user experience (UX) design fieldwork. KSDS Conference Proceeding. DOI, 10(1145/2207676), 2208573.
22. Lee, Y., & Cassim, J. (2009). How the inclusive design process enables social inclusion. International Association of Societies of Design Research (IASDR), 1–10. https://www.academia.edu/3409410/How_the_inclusive_design_process_enables_social_inclusion
23. Lee, J. H., Lee, E., Lee, C. H., Huh, J., & Kim, J. (2023). Cyclic inclusive fashion design process based on an FEA model for inclusive fashion education. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2023.221840010.1080/17543266.2023.2218400 ↗
24. Lee, J. H., Shin, M., Woo, J. Y., Lee, C. H., & Kim, J. E. (2021). A study on body types and development of virtual models for inclusive fashion design. Journal of the Korean Society of Fashion Design, 21(1), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.7233/jksc.2023.73.5.03910.7233/jksc.2023.73.5.039 ↗
25. Marshall, R., Summerskill, S., Case, K., Hussain, A., Gyi, D., Sims, R., & Barnes, J. (2016). Supporting a design driven approach to social inclusion and accessibility in transport. Social Inclusion.4(3), 7-23.https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v4i3.52110.17645/si.v4i3.521 ↗
26. McKelvey, K., & Munslow, J. (2011). Fashion design: Process, innovation and practice. John Wiley & Sons.
27. Microsoft Inclusive Design. Retrieved from https://www.microsoft.com/design/inclusive/. Accessed 26 June 23
28. Norman, G. R., & Schmidt, H. G. (1992). The psychological basis of problem-based learning: A review of the evidence. Academic Medicine, 67(9), 557–565. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199209000-0000210.1097/00001888-199209000-00002 ↗
29. Onel, N., Mukherjee, A., Kreidler, N. B., Díaz, E. M., Furchheim, P., Gupta, S., & Wang, Q. (2018). Tell me your story and I will tell you who you are: Persona perspective in sustainable consumption. Psychology & Marketing, 35(10), 752–765. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.2113210.1002/mar.21132 ↗
30. Pattison, M., & Stedmon, A. W. (2006). Inclusive design and human factors: Designing mobile phones for older users. PsychNology J., 4(3), 267–284. http://www.psychnology.org/File/PNJ4(3)/PSYCHNOLOGY_JOURNAL_4_3_PATTISON.pdf
31. Pruitt, J., & Adlin, T. (2010). The persona lifecycle: Keeping people in mind throughout product design. Elsevier.
32. Romeo, L. D., & Lee, Y. A. (2015). Exploring apparel purchase issues with plus-size female teens. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 19(2), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-02-2014-001210.1108/JFMM-02-2014-0012 ↗
33. Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31–38.
34. Slesarchuk, I. A., Koroleva, L. A., Panyushkina, O. V., & Zaytseva, T. A. (2019, January). Ways to Improve Quality of the Inclusive Clothing Designing Process. In International Scientific Conference Far East Con (ISCFEC 2018). 747–752 Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/iscfec-18.2019.16910.2991/iscfec-18.2019.169 ↗
35. Stecker, P. (1996). The fashion design manual. Macmillan Education AU.10.1007/978-1-349-15162-2 ↗
36. Stokes, B., & Black, C. (2012). Application of the functional, expressive and aesthetic consumer needs model: Assessing the clothing needs of adolescent girls with disabilities. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 5(3), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2012.70073510.1080/17543266.2012.700735 ↗
37. Tawfik, A. A., Trueman, R. J., & Lorz, M. M. (2013). Designing a PBL Environment Using the 3C3R Method. International Journal of Designs for Learning. 4(1), 11-24. https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v4i1.315110.14434/ijdl.v4i1.3151 ↗
38. Tienda, M. (2013). Diversity≠ inclusion: Promoting integration in higher education. Educational Researcher, 42(9), 467–475. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X1351616410.3102/0013189X13516164 ↗
39. Trafton, P. R., & Midgett, C. (2001). Principles and standards: Learning through problems: A powerful approach to teaching mathematics. Teaching Children Mathematics, 7(9), 532–536. https://doi.org/10.5951/TCM.7.9.053210.5951/TCM.7.9.0532 ↗
40. University of Cambridge Inclusive Design Toolkit. http://www.inclusivedesigntoolkit.com/digitalpersonas/. Accessed 26 June 2023
41. Vaismoradi, M., Jones, J., Turunen, H., & Snelgrove, S. (2016). Theme development in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/225904998.pdf10.5430/jnep.v6n5p100 ↗
42. Waller, S., Bradley, M., Hosking, I., & Clarkson, P. J. (2015). Making the case for inclusive design. Applied Ergonomics, 46, 297–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.01210.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.012 ↗
43. Woods, D. R. (1994). Problem-based learning: How to gain the most from PBL. Waterdown, Ont: DR Woods.
44. British standards institution (2005). Retrieved from https://www.abtt.org.uk/. Accessed 26 June 2023