Stacking Relations and Substrate Interaction of Graphene on Copper Foil
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The crystallinity of graphene flakes and their orientation with respect to the Cu(111) substrate are investigated by means of low‐energy electron microscopy (LEEM). The interplay between graphene and the metal substrate during chemical vapor deposition (CVD) introduces a restructuring of the metal surface into surface facets, which undergo a step bunching process during the growth of additional layers. Moreover, the surface facets introduce strain between the successively nucleated layers that follow the topography in a carpet‐like fashion. The strain leads to dislocations in between domains of relaxed Bernal stacking. After the transfer onto an epitaxial buffer layer, the imprinted rippled structure of even monolayer graphene as well as the stacking dislocations are preserved. A similar behavior might also be expected for other CVD grown 2D materials such as hexagonal boron nitride or transition metal dichalcogenides, where stacking relations after transfer on a target substrate or heterostructure could become important in future experiments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Thermal properties of materials · ZnO doping and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institut für Physik Technische Universität Chemnitz Reichenhainer Str. 70 09126 Chemnitz Germany
Center for Materials Architectures and Integration of Nanomembranes (MAIN) Rosenbergstr. 6 09126 Chemnitz Germany
Center for Nanotechnology Innovation@NEST Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia Piazza San Silvestro 12 Pisa 56127 Italy
Graphene Labs Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia Via Morego 10 Genova 16163 Italy
Funding
Horizon 2020
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.110289610.1126/science.1102896 ↗
2. 10.1021/jp040650f10.1021/jp040650f ↗
3. 10.1038/nmat238210.1038/nmat2382 ↗
4. 10.1021/nl072887410.1021/nl0728874 ↗
5. 10.1021/nn101520k10.1021/nn101520k ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.21610110.1103/PhysRevLett.106.216101 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.07542910.1103/PhysRevB.76.075429 ↗
8. 10.1021/jp109002p10.1021/jp109002p ↗
9. 10.1016/j.susc.2008.08.03710.1016/j.susc.2008.08.037 ↗
10. 10.1038/nmat216610.1038/nmat2166 ↗
11. 10.1126/science.117124510.1126/science.1171245 ↗
12. 10.1021/ja109793s10.1021/ja109793s ↗
13. 10.1088/0957-4484/23/3/03560310.1088/0957-4484/23/3/035603 ↗
14. 10.1038/nnano.2010.13210.1038/nnano.2010.132 ↗
15. 10.1021/nn103342310.1021/nn1033423 ↗
16. 10.1088/1367-2630/14/9/09302810.1088/1367-2630/14/9/093028 ↗
17. 10.1126/sciadv.aar517010.1126/sciadv.aar5170 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.15542510.1103/PhysRevB.84.155425 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.23541310.1103/PhysRevB.86.235413 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.24610410.1103/PhysRevLett.108.246104 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41467-019-14192-010.1038/s41467-019-14192-0 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.progsurf.2015.07.00110.1016/j.progsurf.2015.07.001 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.07.09010.1016/j.carbon.2013.07.090 ↗
24. 10.1021/nn203775x10.1021/nn203775x ↗
25. 10.1073/pnas.130939411010.1073/pnas.1309394110 ↗
26. 10.1021/nl204547v10.1021/nl204547v ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.10400510.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.104005 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.07541310.1103/PhysRevB.77.075413 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.24541410.1103/PhysRevB.87.245414 ↗
30. 10.1557/jmr.2016.8210.1557/jmr.2016.82 ↗
31. 10.1116/1.152337210.1116/1.1523372 ↗
32. 10.1116/1.58186410.1116/1.581864 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.04140610.1103/PhysRevB.87.041406 ↗
34. 10.1088/0022-3727/47/9/09401310.1088/0022-3727/47/9/094013 ↗
35. 10.1038/ncomms992610.1038/ncomms9926 ↗
36. 10.1088/2053-1583/2/1/01400610.1088/2053-1583/2/1/014006 ↗
37. C.Bouhafs S.Pezzini N.Mishra V.Mišeikis Y.Niu C.Struzzi A. A.Zakharov S.Forti C.Coletti arXiv:2006.06667v12020.