Mechanical Testing of Micro-specimens of Al6061-T6 Using DIC for Strain Measurement
Source abstract
Abstract
Tensile properties of metals are typically measured using dog-bone shaped specimens having dimensions as per specifications imposed by international standards organizations. However, these properties may be influenced by the size of the specimen, especially when the cross-sectional dimensions are lower. At lower length scales, microstructure could have an effect on the mechanical behavior. In this study, tensile experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of cross-sectional dimensions on Young’s modulus of Al6061-T6 materials. Due to the small size of the specimens, digital image correlation, a non-contact measurement technique was used to obtain strain filed in the gage section of the specimen. Spray paint or toner powder were used to produce speckle pattern on the specimen surface for better correlation of the images. For specimens having the thickness of the order of a fraction of a mm, the natural gray pattern observed on the surface of the specimen was found to provide a good speckle pattern. This natural speckle pattern was used to correlate the images instead of synthetic speckles, to avoid the effect of paint on the Young’s modulus being measured on specimens with cross-sectional dimensions below 1 mm. Young’s modulus was found to be constant at about 67 GPa for specimens whose area of cross-section was more than 3 mm2. When the area of cross-section was lesser, Young’s modulus was found to decrease with a decrease in area of cross-section. Larger spread in Young’s modulus was also observed in the specimens with area of cross-section < 1 mm2.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Optical measurement and interference techniques · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. Pham HH, Williams ME, Mahaffey P, Radovic M, Arroyave R, Cagin T (2011) Finite-temperature elasticity of fcc Al: Atomistic simulations and ultrasonic measurements. Phys Rev B 84:06410110.1103/PhysRevB.84.064101 ↗
2. Zhou XY, Huang BL, Zhang TY (2016) Size-and temperature-dependent young’s modulus and size-dependent thermal expansion coefficient of thin films. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18:21508–2151710.1039/C6CP03294J ↗
3. Abazari AM, Safavi SM, Rezazadeh G, Villanueva LG (2015) Modelling the size effects on the mechanical properties of micro/nano structures. Sensors 15:28543–2856210.3390/s151128543 ↗
4. Srikar VT, Spearing SM (2003) A critical review of microscale mechanical testing methods used in the design of microelectromechanical systems. Exp Mech 43:238–24710.1007/BF02410522 ↗
5. Mizubayashi H, Yoshihara Y, Okuda S (1992) The elasticity measurements of aluminium nm-films. Phys Status Solidi A 129:475–48110.1002/pssa.2211290217 ↗
6. Sergueeva AV, Zhou J, Meacham BE, Branagan DJ (2009) Gage length and sample size effect on measured properties during tensile testing. Mater Sci Eng A 526:79–8310.1016/j.msea.2009.07.046 ↗
7. Zhao Y, Guo Y, Wei Q, Topping T, Dangelewicz A, Zhu Y, Langdon T, Lavernia E (2009) Influence of specimen dimensions and strain measurement methods on tensile stress–strain curves. Mater Sci Eng A 525:68–7710.1016/j.msea.2009.06.031 ↗
8. Yuan W, Zhang Z, Su Y, Qiaoa L, Chu W (2012) Influence of specimen thickness with rectangular cross-section on the tensile properties of structural steels. Mater Sci Eng A 532:601–60510.1016/j.msea.2011.11.021 ↗
9. Ghangrekar PS, Banjare R, Rao BC, Murthy H (2014) Tensile testing of A l6061-T6 microspecimens with ultrafine grained structure derived from machining-based SPD process. J Mater Res 29:1278–128710.1557/jmr.2014.115 ↗
10. Akbary FH, Santofimia MJ, Sietsma J (2014) Elastic strain measurement of miniature tensile specimens. Exp Mech 54:165–17310.1007/s11340-013-9785-7 ↗
11. LaVan DA, Sharpe WN (1999) Tensile testing of microsamples. Exp Mech 39:210–21610.1007/BF02323554 ↗
12. Bornert M, Brémand F, Doumalin P, Dupré JC, Fazzini M, Grédiac M, Hild F, Mistou S, Molimard J, Orteu JJ, Robert L, Surrel Y, Vacher P, Wattrisse B (2009) Assessment of digital image correlation measurement errors: methodology and results. Exp Mech 49:353–37010.1007/s11340-008-9204-7 ↗
13. Sutton MA, Orteu JJ, Schreier HW (2009) Image correlation for shape, motion and deformation measurements, basic concepts theory and applications. Springer, New York
14. Kammers AD, Daly S (2013) Digital image correlation under scanning electron microscopy: methodology and validation. Exp Mech 53:1743–176110.1007/s11340-013-9782-x ↗
15. Badulescu C, Grédiac M, Mathias JD, Roux D (2009) A procedure for accurate one-dimensional strain measurement using the grid method. Exp Mech 49:841–85410.1007/s11340-008-9203-8 ↗