Research on Automatic Attitude Control Technology of Six-Degree-of-Freedom Displacement Compensation for Full-Scale Aircraft Static Test
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract A novel closed-loop control principle was proposed for precisely controlling the attitude of full-scale aircraft during static test under large deformation. The test system was developed by integrating a displacement acquisition system, an industrial computer platform, a coordinated control system and hydraulic actuators. The displacement acquisition system was employed to facilitate the real-time sensing of the aircraft attitude changes. This was subsequently analyzed by computers to calculate attitude errors, based on which the compensation values were calculated for attitude correction. The correction was converted into voltage signals through an in-house program pre-integrated into the industrial computer platform. Finally, the MTS coordinated control system generates new control parameters based on the voltage signals, enabling a real-time adjustment on the movement of hydraulic actuators, which modifies the aircraft attitude. A device was developed for simulating the deformation characteristics of aircrafts under large deformation. A six-degree-of-freedom restraint system has been installed on the device according to the principle. Experiments were conducted to verify the capability of the approach for precisely controlling the aircraft attitude under various deformation states. Results showed that the aircraft attitudes were all restored to a value close to the theoretical attitude via displacement compensation scheme proposed, with the translational error less than ± 2 mm and the rotational error less than ± 0.02°. Whilst these errors were successfully reduced by applying the compensation algorithm during loading, they cannot be completely eliminated due to the influence of measurement and control errors.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Simulation and Modeling Applications · Inertial Sensor and Navigation · Aerospace and Aviation Technology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Civil Aviation Administration of China (2016) China civil aviation regulations- Part 25- Airworthiness standards for transport aircraft: CCAR-25-R4[S]. Beijing: policy and regulation department, civil aviation administration of China
2. Mohaghegh M (2005) Validation and certification of aircraft structures [C]. In: Proceedings of the 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, pp 216210.2514/6.2005-2162 ↗
3. Lin J (2023) The historical developments and tendencies of building block approach and testing pyramids. Adv Aeronautical Sci ineering 14(05):8–18
4. Jae-Yeul S, Seokmin A (2013) Full-scale static test of small composite aircraft. Adv Compos Mater 23(1):85–98
5. Jae-Yeul S, Sang-Geun L, Seok-Min A (2012) KC-100 full-scale static test system. Aerosp Eng Technol 11(1):7–18
6. Zheng J, Tang J, Wang B (2019) Static test technology for C919 full-scale aircraft structure. Acta Aeronauticaet Astronaut Sin 40(1):522364–522364
7. Wang L, Xie C, Yang C (2013) Static aeroelastic analysis of flexible aircraft with large deformations [C]. In: Proceedings of the 54th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, pp 189310.2514/6.2013-1893 ↗
8. Yang C, Wang L, Xie C et al (2012) Aeroelastic trim and flight loads analysis of flexible aircraft with large deformations. Sci China Technol Sci 55:2700–271110.1007/s11431-012-4912-8 ↗
9. He Z, Liu Y, Li Z (2019) Load design for full scale static test of slat on large civil aircraft. Acta Aeronauticaet Astronaut Sin 40(2):522197–522197
10. Tian W, Xia F, Song P et al (2020) Load balancing for wing deformation optimization in amphibious aircraft static test. Acta Aeronauticaet Astronaut Sin 41(11):223956–223956
11. Wang B, Zheng J, Liu W et al (2023) Testing load transacting method based on assessment target equivalent. Acta Aeronauticaet Astronaut Sin 44(17):228064–228064
12. Jae-Yeul S (2020) Evaluating the accuracy of load application for static structural testing of aerospace flight vehicles. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci 21(1):133–15210.1007/s42405-019-00223-z ↗
13. Kweder J, Panther CC, Smith JE (2010) Applications of circulation control, yesterday and today. Int J Eng 4(5):411–429
14. Dzyuba A, Dasov S, Chumak S et al (2018) Development of a measuring, computing and control complex for aircraft testing in the static testing laboratory of TsAGI. Sensors Syst 6:60–67
15. Klaas A, Richardson P, Burguete R et al (2014) Integrated high accuracy portable metrology for large scale structural testing [C]. In: Proceedings of the 13th European conference on spacecraft structures, materials & environmental testing, pp 139
16. Li S, Zhang G, Wang J (2017) Civil aircraft health management research based on big data and deep learning technologies [C]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE international conference on prognostics and health management (ICPHM), pp 154–15910.1109/ICPHM.2017.7998321 ↗
17. Kolman EM, Kurulyuk DV, Limonin MV (2021) Actual methods of full-scale metal-composite aircraft structures static testing with the use of information systems [C]. Proc J Phys: Conf Ser 01201210.1088/1742-6596/1990/1/012012 ↗
18. Jian Wu, Yuan S, Zhou G et al (2009) Design and evaluation of a wireless sensor network based aircraft strength testing system. Sensors 9(6):4195–421010.3390/s90604195 ↗
19. Chen X, Fan H, Pei J et al (2009) Real time monitoring and forecasting of full scale aircraft static test. Tsinghua Sci ogy 14:38–4210.1016/S1007-0214(10)70028-6 ↗
20. Tian K, Sun Z, Li Z (2024) High-precision digital twin method for structural static test monitoring. Acta Aeronauticaet Astronaut Sin 45(7):429134–429134
21. Gao C, Zheng S, Cong D et al (2018) Modeling and control of the cscec multi-function testing system. J Earthq Eng 22(2):257–28010.1080/13632469.2016.1217806 ↗
22. Yang M-S, Jeong J-G, Seol C-W et al (2004) Technical papers: floating set-up method for full scale airframe durability test. J Korean Soc Aeronaut Space Sci 32(2):88–94
23. Gao Y, Lin J, Yang L et al (2016) Development and calibration of an accurate 6-degree-of-freedom measurement system with total station. Meas Sci Technol 27(12):12510310.1088/0957-0233/27/12/125103 ↗
24. Murri DG, Jackson EB, Shelton RO (2015) Check-cases for verification of 6-degree-of-freedom flight vehicle simulations [R]: NASA, TM-2015–21867510.2514/6.2015-1810 ↗
25. Zheng J, Wang B, Zhu L et al (2021) Research on attitude control and constraint system design of full-scale aircraft static test based on barycenter [C]. In: Proceedings of the 32nd congress of the international council of the aeronautical sciences, Shanghai, China
26. Wang Y, Pei L, Li Q et al (2020) Full-scale aircraft strength test technology of next generation fighter. Acta Aeronauticaet Astronaut Sin 41(6):523482–523482
27. Xing Du, Feng J, He Q (2017) Self-adaptable loading technique for undercarriage in full scale aircraft structure test. Sci Technol Eng 17(02):288–292
28. Liu W, Zheng J (2020) Self-adaptable loading technique for main landing gears in structural test of large airliner. Aeronaut Sci Technol 31(12):42–47
29. Wang M, Liu B, Wang G (2021) Research on load modification method of large aircraft landing gear. Chin J Appl Mech 38(02):708–714
30. Wang G, Tang J (2014) Error analysis & optimization for constraint point load of full-scale aircraft test. Eng Test 54(02):42–46
31. Liu B, Wang M, Zheng J et al (2021) Error control technology in static test on connection area of main landing gear of large aircraft. Sci Technol Eng 21(10):4249–4254
32. Wang X, Xia L, Liu X (2021) Research on landing gear displacement compensation loading technology of the whole structural test. Mach Tool Hydraul 49(08):55–59