Analysis of Yield Criteria and Flow Curves on FLC for TWIP900 Steel
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, the applicability of yield criteria and flow curve models to predict forming limit curve (FLC) via the Marciniak-Kuczynski (M-K) model is investigated for TWIP900 steel. Forming limit characteristics of TWIP900 are determined experimentally and numerically. The yield criteria of Hill48, Barlat89, YLD2000-2d, and BBC2000 are tested and compared with each other. Results indicate that the YLD2000-2d and the BBC2000 yield criteria are found to be more accurate than the other criteria. The YLD2000 criterion has the best prediction capability with the Krupskowsky flow curve while the BBC2000 model has the best prediction with the Ludwick flow curve model.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Worldautosteel: Steel Your Strength. https://www.worldautosteel.org/why-steel/steel-your-strength/ (Accessed 26 May 2019)
2. Nam, J.B.: Development of new auto steels and application technology. http://309fbf2c62e8221fbaf0-b80c17cbaf20104b072d586b316c6210.r88.cf1.rackcdn.com/Gangzhao%20Presentations/09_China%20Automotive%20Steel%20Conference_POSCO_Jae-Bok%20Nam.pdf (Accessed 2 May 2013). 01.01.2016
3. Singh MK (2016) Application of steel in automotive industry. Int J Emerging Technol Adv Eng 6(7):246–253
4. Schumann VH (1972) Martensitische umwandlung in austenitischen mangan-kohlenstoff-stählen. Neue Hütte 17(10):605–609
5. Grässel O, Krüger L, Frommeyer G, Meyer L (2000) High strength Fe–Mn–(Al, Si) TRIP/TWIP steels development—properties—application. Int. J. Plasticity 16(10):1391–1409. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(00)00015-210.1016/S0749-6419(00)00015-2 ↗
6. Jung J, Lee O, Park Y, Kim D, Jin K, Kim S, Song K (2008) Microstructure and mechanical properties of high Mn TWIP steels. Journal of the Korean Institute of Metals and Materials 46(10):627–633. https://doi.org/10.3390/met712057110.3390/met7120571 ↗
7. Kilic S, Ozturk F, Sigirtmac T, Tekin G (2015) Effects of pre-strain and temperature on bake hardening of TWIP900CR steel. J Iron Steel Res Int 22(4):361–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1006-706X(15)30012-110.1016/S1006-706X(15)30012-1 ↗
8. Kiliç S, Öztürk F (2016) Comparison of performances of commercial TWIP900 and DP600 advanced high strength steels in automotive industry. J. Fac. Eng. Archit. GAZI 31(3), 567–578. doi:https://doi.org/10.17341/gummfd.8138910.17341/gummfd.81389 ↗
9. De Cooman B, Chin K, Kim J (2011) High Mn TWIP steels for automotive applications. New Trends and Developments in Automotive System Engineering, InTech, 101–12810.5772/14086 ↗
10. Chung K, Ahn K, Yoo D-H, Chung K-H, Seo M-H, Park S-H (2011) Formability of TWIP (twinning induced plasticity) automotive sheets. Int J Plasticity 27(1):52–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.03.00610.1016/j.ijplas.2010.03.006 ↗
11. Habibi N, Zarei-Hanzaki A, Abedi H-R (2015) An investigation into the fracture mechanisms of twinning-induced-plasticity steel sheets under various strain paths. J. Mater. Process Tech. 224(1):102–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.04.01410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.04.014 ↗
12. Han HN, Kim K-H (2003) A ductile fracture criterion in sheet metal forming process. J. Mater. Process Tech. 142(1):231–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00587-910.1016/S0924-0136(03)00587-9 ↗
13. Lou Y, Huh H (2013) Prediction of ductile fracture for advanced high strength steel with a new criterion: experiments and simulation. J Mater Process Tech 213(8):1284–1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.03.00110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.03.001 ↗
14. Xu L, Barlat F, Lee M-G (2012) Hole expansion of twinning-induced plasticity steel. Scripta Mater 66(12):1012–1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.01.06210.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.01.062 ↗
15. Xu L, Chen L, De Cooman BC, Steglich D, Barlat F (2010) Hole expansion of advanced high strenth steel sheet sample. Int J Mater Form 3(1):247–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-010-0753-910.1007/s12289-010-0753-9 ↗
16. Ahn K, Yoo D, Seo MH, Park S-H, Chung K (2009) Springback prediction of TWIP automotive sheets. Met Mater Int 15(4):637–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-009-0637-z10.1007/s12540-009-0637-z ↗
17. Hill R (1948) A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences 193(1033):281–297
18. Barlat F, Lian K (1989) Plastic behavior and stretchability of sheet metals. Part I: A yield function for orthotropic sheets under plane stress conditions Int J Plasticity 5(1):51–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-6419(89)90019-310.1016/0749-6419(89)90019-3 ↗
19. Barlat F, Brem JC, Yoon JW, Chung K, Dick RE, Lege DJ, Pourboghrat F, Choi SH, Chu E (2003) Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets—part 1: theory. Int. J. Plasticity 19(9):1297–1319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(02)00019-010.1016/S0749-6419(02)00019-0 ↗
20. Banabic D, Balan T, Comsa DS (2000) A new yield criterion for orthotropic sheet metals under plane-stress conditions. In: proceedings of the 7th conference ‘TPR2000’, Cluj Napoca, Romania, pp. 217–224
21. Hashimoto K, Kuwabara T, Iizuka E, Yoon JW (2010) Hole expansion simulation of high strength steel sheet. Int J Mater Form 3(1):259–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-010-0756-610.1007/s12289-010-0756-6 ↗
22. Barlat F, Aretz H, Yoon JW, Karabin ME, Brem JC, Dick RE (2005) Linear transfomation-based anisotropic yield functions. Int. J. Plasticity 21(5):1009–1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.06.00410.1016/j.ijplas.2004.06.004 ↗
23. Toros S, Polat A, Ozturk F (2012) Formability and springback characterization of TRIP800 advanced high strength steel. Mater. Design. 41:298–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.05.00610.1016/j.matdes.2012.05.006 ↗
24. Ozturk F, Toros S, Kilic S, Kacar I (2014) Evaluation of anisotropy by two different tests for TRIP800 steel. In: key engineering materials, pp. 1139-1144. Trans Tech Publ10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.622-623.1139 ↗
25. Ozturk F, Lee D (2005) Experimental and numerical analysis of out-of-plane formability test. J. Mater. Process Tech. 170(1–2):247–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.05.01010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.05.010 ↗
26. Asame Co.: Automated Strain Analysis and Measurement Environment. http://www.techlab.fr/ (Accessed 2 Apr 2015). 01.01.2016
27. Ozturk F, Dilmec M, Turkoz M, Ece RE, Halkaci HS (2009) Grid marking and measurement methods for sheet metal formability. In: the 5th international conference and exhibition on design and production of machines and dies/molds, Turkey, June, pp. 18–21
28. Tresca H (1864) Memoire sur l'écoulement des solides à de forte pressions. Acad Sci Paris 2(1):59
29. Mises RV (1913) Mechanik der festen Körper im plastisch-deformablen Zustand. Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse 1913(1):582–592
30. Banabic D (2010) Sheet metal forming processes: constitutive modelling and numerical simulation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin10.1007/978-3-540-88113-1 ↗
31. Fallahiarezoodar A, Altan T (2015) Determining flow stress data by combining uniaxial tensile and biaxial bulge tests. Stamping Journal 1(1)
32. Marciniak Z (1965) Stability of plastic shells under tension with kinematic boundary condition. Archiwum Mechaniki Stosorwanej 17(0):577–592
33. Marciniak Z, Kuczyński K (1967) Limit strains in the processes of stretch-forming sheet metal. Int J Mech Sci 9(9):609–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7403(67)90066-510.1016/0020-7403(67)90066-5 ↗
34. Azrin M, Backofen WA (1970) The deformation and failure of a biaxially stretched sheet. MT 1(10):2857–2865. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0303782410.1007/BF03037824 ↗
35. Banabic D (2010) A review on recent developments of Marciniak-Kuczynski model. Computer Methods in Materials Science 10(4):225–237
36. Hutchinson JW, Neale KW (1978) Sheet necking-III. Strain-rate effects. In: Koistinen DP, Wang N-M (eds) Mechanics of sheet metal forming: material behavior and deformation analysis. Springer US, Boston, MA, pp 269–28510.1007/978-1-4613-2880-3_11 ↗
37. Ghazanfari, A., Assempour, A.: Calibration of forming limit diagrams using a modified Marciniak–Kuczynski model and an empirical law. Mater Design 34(0), 185–191 (2012). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.07.05710.1016/j.matdes.2011.07.057 ↗
38. Ozturk F, Toros S, Kilic S (2014) Effects of anisotropic yield functions on prediction of forming limit diagrams of DP600 advanced high strength steel. Procedia Engineering 81(1):760–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.07310.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.073 ↗