Hole-Drilling Method for Deep Residual Stress Measure in Tensile Armour Wires
Source abstract
Abstract
Background Incremental center hole drilling method (ICHD) emerges as a reliable and practical method to characterize residual stresses (RS) in tensile armor wires of flexible pipelines. However, geometric restrictions imposed by the standard ASTM E837 limit RS measurements in these wires to shallow depths, around 0.8 mm. Objective The objective of this work is to develop a methodology for extend the ICHD measurement depth in tensile armor wires up to half their thickness. Methods Numerical and experimental studies were carried out to evaluate specific calibration coefficients for the geometry of the tensile armor wires. The validation of the results was carried out on samples of wires, RS free, submitted to different loading type conditions. The work also produced wire samples with permanent RS that allow one to compare the results of the extended ICHD (eICHD) with conventional ICHD (within the limits recommended by standard E-837), and by layer-removal X-ray diffraction (XRD). At last, the eICDH and ICDH methods have been applied to a tensile wire sample that was taken out of service. Results Residual stress profile measured by eICDH shows agreement with analytical results in elastic load samples. In the permanent RS sample, the comparative results between eICDH, ICDH, and XRD showed an excellent correlation. The tensile wire taken out of service showed a complex RS state near-surface with the shear stress influencing RS more deeply than longitudinal and transverse stress. Conclusions Experimental and numerical tests was carried out to determine specific calibrations coefficients for ICHD to extend measure depth in tensile armors wires. The develop methodology for eICHD allow measure RS profile in tensile armor wires from 0.08 mm until 2.4 mm, approximately half-thickness.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Advanced machining processes and optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Da Silva DS (2018) Desenvolvimento de metodologia para análise de tensões em armaduras de tração de dutos flexíveis. Dissertation, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil
2. Fernando US, Davidson M, Yan K, Roy MJ, Pirling T, Withers PJ, Francis JA (2017) Evolution of Residual Stress in Tensile Armour Wires of Flexible Pipes During Pipe Manufacture. Proceedings of the ASME 2017 36th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. Volume 5A: Pipelines, Risers, and Subsea Systems. Trondheim, Norway. June 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2017-61490.10.1115/OMAE2017-61490 ↗
3. American Petroleum Institute (2014) API 17J. Specification for unbonded flexible pipe. Fourth edition
4. British Standards (2005) BS-7910. Guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures
5. Tagliari MR et al (2019) Tensile Armor Wires Submitted to Slow Strain Rate Tests in a Corrosive Environment and Cathodic Protection: A Comparison Between Two Different Microstructures. Maters Res [online] 22(3). https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2018-046510.1590/1980-5373-MR-2018-0465 ↗
6. Trindade MP et al (2021) Quantitative analysis of localized corrosion in tensile armor wire of flexible riser submitted to sweet stress corrosion cracking testing with crevice. Tecnologia em Metalurgia, Materiais e Mineração. https://doi.org/10.4322/2176-1523.2021245110.4322/2176-1523.20212451 ↗
7. Schajer GS (ed) (2013) Practical residual stress measurement methods. John Wiley & Sons10.1002/9781118402832 ↗
8. Nunes RM, da Silva Rocha A, Hirsch TGK (2021) Residual stress states in cementite and ferrite in a combined cold drawing process of AISI 1045 steel using neutron diffraction and synchrotron radiation. Tecnologia em Metalurgia, Materiais e Mineração. https://doi.org/10.4322/2176-1523.2021240310.4322/2176-1523.20212403 ↗
9. Carone S, Moramarco V, Pappalettera G, Barbieri G, Casavola C (2022) Residual stress measurement on Titanium Grade 5 and Inconel 625 thin dissimilar welded joints by contour method. J Mater Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-06581-y10.1007/s10853-021-06581-y ↗
10. American Society for Testing and Materials (2002) ASTM E-837. Standard Test Method for Determining Residual Stresses by the Hole-Drilling Strain-Gage Method, Annual book of ASTM standards, Vol 03.01. ASTM Internacional
11. Schajer GS, Rickert TJ (2011) Incremental computation technique for residual stress calculations using the integral method. Exp Mech 51(7):1217–1222. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9792-0_3510.1007/978-1-4419-9792-0_35 ↗
12. Schwarz TH, Kockelmann H (1993) Die Bohrlochmethode–ein für viele Anwendungsbereiche optimales Verfahren zur experimentellen Ermittlung von Eigenspannungen. Messtechnische Briefe 29(2):33–38
13. Schajer GS, Whitehead PS (2018) Hole-drilling method for measuring residual stresses. Synthesis SEM Lectures on Experimental Mechanics 1(1):1–186. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00818ED1V01Y201712SEM00110.2200/S00818ED1V01Y201712SEM001 ↗
14. Vishay (2017) Measurement of Residual Stresses by the Hole-Drilling Strain Gage Method. Tech Note TN-503, Vishay
15. Sobolevski EG, Nau A, Scholtes B (2011) Residual Stress Analysis Using the Hole-Drilling Method and Geometry-Specific Calibration Functions. In Materials Science Forum (Vol. 681, pp. 159–164). Trans Tech Publications, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.681.15910.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.681.159 ↗
16. Valentini E, Bertelli L, Benincasa A, Gulisano S (2019) Recent Advancements in the Hole-Drilling Strain-Gage Method for Determining Residual Stresses. In New Challenges in Residual Stress Measurements and Evaluation. IntechOpen10.5772/intechopen.90392 ↗
17. Nobre JP, Kornmeier M, Scholtes B (2018) Plasticity Effects in the Hole-Drilling Residual Stress Measurement in Peened Surfaces. Exp Mech 58:369–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-017-0352-510.1007/s11340-017-0352-5 ↗
18. Barsanti M, Beghini M, Bertini L, Monelli BD, Santus C (2016) First-order correction to counter the effect of eccentricity on the hole-drilling integral method with strain-gage rosettes. J Strain Anal Eng Des 51(6):431–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/030932471664952910.1177/0309324716649529 ↗
19. Sobolevsky HG (2007) Residual Stress Analysis of Components with Real Geometries Using Incremental Hole-Drilling Technique and a Differential Evaluation. Doctoral thesis. Universidade de Kassel, Alemãnha
20. Alegre JM, Díaz A, Cuesta II et al (2019) Analysis of the Influence of the Thickness and the Hole Radius on the Calibration Coefficients in the Hole-Drilling Method for the Determination of Non-uniform Residual Stresses. Exp Mech 59:79–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-018-0433-010.1007/s11340-018-0433-0 ↗
21. Ma J, Welo T (2021) Analytical springback assessment in flexible stretch bending of complex shapes. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 160:103653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2020.10365310.1016/j.ijmachtools.2020.103653 ↗
22. Fatemi A, Molaei R (2020) Novel specimen geometries for fatigue testing of additive manufactured metals under axial, torsion, and combined axial-torsion loadings. Int J Fatigue 130:105287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.10528710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105287 ↗
23. Hauk V (1997) Structural and residual stresses analysis by nondestructive methods. Elsevier, Amsterdam
24. Grant P (2002) Evaluation of Residual Stress Measurement Uncertainties using X-Ray Diffraction and Hole Drilling via a UK Intercomparison Exercise. MATC (MN) 020:1–8
25. Olson MD, DeWald AT, Hill MR (2021) Precision of Hole-Drilling Residual Stress Depth Profile Measurements and an Updated Uncertainty Estimator. Exp Mech 61(3):549–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-020-00679-110.1007/s11340-020-00679-1 ↗