Multi-Axial Contour Method for Mapping Residual Stresses in Continuously Processed Bodies
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper describes a method for extending the capability of the contour method to allow for the measurement of spatially varying multi-axial residual stresses in prismatic, continuously processed bodies. Currently, the contour method is used to determine a 2D map of the residual stress normal to a plane. This work uses an approach similar to the contour method to quantify multiple components of eigenstrain in continuously processed bodies, which are used to calculate residual stress. The result of the measurement is an estimate of the full residual stress tensor at every point in the body. The approach is first outlined for a 2D body and the accuracy of the methodology is demonstrated for a representative case using a numerical experiment. Next, an extension to the 3D case is given and the accuracy is demonstrated for representative cases using numerical experiments. Finally, measurements are performed on a thin sheet of Ti-6Al-4V with a band of laser peening down the center (assumed to be 2D) and a thick laser peened plate of 316L stainless steel to show that the approach is valid under real experimental conditions.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Advanced machining processes and optimization · Surface Treatment and Residual Stress
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. Prime MB (2001) Cross-sectional mapping of residual stresses by measuring the surface contour after a cut. J Eng Mater Technol 123:162–168.10.1115/1.1345526 ↗
2. DeWald AT, Rankin JE, Hill MR, Lee MJ, Chen H-L (2004) Assessment of tensile residual stress mitigation in Alloy 22 welds due to laser peening. J Eng Mater Technol 126(4):465–473.10.1115/1.1789957 ↗
3. Zhang Y, Fitzpatrick ME, Edwards L (2004) Cross-sectional mapping of residual stresses in a VPPA weld using the contour method. Acta Mater 52:5225–5232.10.1016/j.actamat.2004.07.045 ↗
4. Prime MB, Sebring RJ, Edwards JM, Hughes DJ, Webster PJ (2004) Laser surface-contouring and spline data-smoothing for residual-stress measurement. Exp Mech 44(2):176–184.10.1007/BF02428177 ↗
5. Lu J (ed) (1996) Handbook of Measurement of Residual Stresses. Prentice Hall PTR.
6. Krawitz AD, Winholtz RA (1994) Use of position-dependent stress-free standards for diffraction stress measurements. Mater Sci Eng A 185:123–130.10.1016/0921-5093(94)90935-0 ↗
7. Tanaka K, Akiniwa Y (2004) Diffraction measurements of residual macrostress and microstress using X-rays, synchrotron and neutrons. JSME Int J Ser A: Solid Mech Mater Eng 47(3):252–263.10.1299/jsmea.47.252 ↗
8. Martinez-Perez ML, Mompean FJ, Ruiz-Hervias J, Borlado CR, Atienza JM, Garcia-Hernandez M, Elices M, Gil-Sevillano J, Peng RL, Buslaps T (2004) Residual stress profiling in the ferrite and cementite phases of cold-drawn steel rods by synchrotron X-ray and neutron diffraction. Acta Mater 52(18):5303–5313.10.1016/j.actamat.2004.07.036 ↗
9. Ueda Y, Fukuda K, K YC (1986) New measuring method of axisymmetric three-dimensional residual stresses using inherent strains as parameters. J EngMater Technol 108(4):328–334.10.1115/1.3225890 ↗
10. Mura T (1987) Micromechanics of defects in solids. Kluwer, Boston, Massachusetts.10.1007/978-94-009-3489-4 ↗
11. Hill MR (1996) Determination of residual stress based on the estimation of eigenstrain. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
12. Greenberg MD (1978) Foundations of applied mathematics. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
13. Hill MR, Lin WY (2002) Residual stress measurement in a ceramic-metallic graded material. J Eng Mater Technol 124(2):185–191.10.1115/1.1446073 ↗
14. DeWald AT, Hill MR (2003) Improved data reduction for the deep-hole method of residual stress measurement. J Strain Anal Eng Des 38(1):65–78.10.1243/030932403762671908 ↗