Can experiments select the configurational component of excess entropy?
Source abstract
Abstract
Configurational entropy is frequently used to rationalize the structural dynamics of glass-forming liquids. The main problem with this concept is that it is not directly accessible to experiments. We introduce a procedure to estimate the configurational component of the excess entropy of a liquid --specifically, the configurational-entropy contribution from the structural relaxation process-- through a combined investigation of dynamic and thermodynamic properties as functions of temperature and pressure. We test our method on orthoterphenyl, salol, and glycerol, and find that the fraction of excess entropy that arises from structural configurations is about 70% for all three materials.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Material Dynamics and Properties · Thermodynamic properties of mixtures · Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. G. Adam, J.H. Gibbs, J. Chem. Phys. 43, 139 (1965).10.1063/1.1696442 ↗
2. R.J. Greet, D. Turnbull, J. Chem. Phys. 47, 2185 (1967).10.1063/1.1712251 ↗
3. J.H. Magill, J. Chem. Phys. 47, 2802 (1967).10.1063/1.1712301 ↗
4. S. Takahara, O. Yamamuro, H. Suga, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 171, 259 (1994).10.1016/0022-3093(94)90195-3 ↗
5. S. Takahara, O. Yamamuro, T. Matsuo, J. Phys. Chem. 99, 9589 (1995).10.1021/j100023a042 ↗
6. R. Richert, C.A. Angell, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 9016 (1998).10.1063/1.476348 ↗
7. A. Scala et al. , Nature (London) 406, 166 (2000).10.1038/35018034 ↗
8. S. Sastry, Nature (London) 409, 164 (2001).10.1038/35051524 ↗
9. M. Goldstein, J. Chem. Phys. 64, 4767 (1976).10.1063/1.432063 ↗
10. F.W. Starr, C.A. Angell, H.E. Stanley, Physica A 323, 51 (2003).10.1016/S0378-4371(03)00012-8 ↗
11. L.M. Martinez, C.A. Angell, Nature (London) 410, 663 (2001).10.1038/35070517 ↗
12. C.A. Angell, S. Borik, J. Non-Crys. Solids 307-310, 393 (2002).10.1016/S0022-3093(02)01500-4 ↗
13. W.A. Phillips et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 2381 (1989).10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.2381 ↗
14. R.J. Speedy, J. Phys. Chem. B 105, 11737 (2001).10.1021/jp0116656 ↗
15. G.P. Johari, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 307-310, 387 (2002), and references therein.10.1016/S0022-3093(02)01499-0 ↗
16. G.P. Johari, J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 5048 (2003).10.1021/jp0275241 ↗
17. R. Casalini et al. , Phys. Rev. E 64, 41504 (2001).10.1103/PhysRevE.64.041504 ↗
18. H. Schlosser, J. Ferrante, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 1, 2727 (1989).10.1088/0953-8984/1/16/010 ↗
19. L. Comez et al. , Phys. Rev. E 66, 032501 (2002).10.1103/PhysRevE.66.032501 ↗
20. D. Prevosto et al. , Phys. Rev. B 67, 174202 (2003).10.1103/PhysRevB.67.174202 ↗
21. S.S. Chang, A.B. Bestul, J. Chem. Phys. 56, 503 (1972).10.1063/1.1676895 ↗
22. M. Naoki, S. Koeda, J. Phys. Chem. 93, 948 (1989).10.1021/j100339a078 ↗
23. M. Naoki, H. Endou, K. Matsumoto, J. Phys. Chem. 91, 4169 (1987).10.1021/j100299a044 ↗
24. C. Hansen et al. , J. Chem. Phys. 107, 1086 (1997).10.1063/1.474456 ↗
25. G. Fytas, Th. Dorfmüller, C.H. Wang, J. Phys. Chem. 87, 5041 (1983).10.1021/j150642a052 ↗
26. G.P. Johari, E. Whalley, Faraday Symp. Chem. Soc. 6, 23 (1972).10.1039/fs9720600023 ↗
27. M. Oguni (private communication).
28. L. Comez, S. Corezzi, D. Fioretto, H. Kriegs, A. Best, W. Steffen, to be published in Phys. Rev. E.
29. G.E. Gibson, W.F. Giauque, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 45, 93 (1923).10.1021/ja01654a014 ↗
30. A. Gilchrist, J.E. Earley, R.H. Cole, J. Chem. Phys. 26, 196 (1957).10.1063/1.1743249 ↗
31. P. Lunkenheimer, U. Schneider, R. Brand, A. Loidl, Contemp. Phys. 41, 15 (2000).10.1080/001075100181259 ↗
32. W. Kauzmann, Chem. Rev. 43, 219 (1948).10.1021/cr60135a002 ↗
33. G.P. Johari, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 8958 (2000).10.1063/1.481509 ↗