Electric field unbinding of solid-supported lipid multilayers
Source abstract
Abstract
We studied by X-ray reflectivity the behaviour of fully hydrated solid-supported lipid multilayers under the influence of a transverse electric field, under conditions routinely used in the electroformation process. The kinetics of sample loss (unbinding) was measured as a function of the amplitude and frequency of the applied field by monitoring the integrated intensity of the Bragg peaks. We also performed a time-resolved analysis of the intensity of the first Bragg peak and characterized the final state of the sample.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior · Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Electroporation and Electrofusion in Cell Biology, edited by E. Neumann, A.E. Sowers, C.A. Jordan (Plenum Press, New York, 1989)
2. Giant Vesicles, Perspectives in Supramolecular Chemistry, edited by P.L. Luisi, P. Walde (John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 2000), Vol. 6
3. J. Delattre et al., Liposomes: technological, biological and pharmacological aspects (Inserm, Paris, 1993) (in French)
4. M.I. Angelova, S. Soléau, Ph. Méléard, J.F. Faucon, P. Bothorel, Progr. Colloid Polym. Sci. 89, 127 (1992)10.1007/BFb0116295 ↗
5. J. Als-Nielsen, D. McMorrow, Elements of Modern X-Ray Physics (Wiley, Chichester, 2001)
6. J. Katsaras, V.A. Raghunathan, Aligned lipid-water systems, in Lipid bilayers: Structure and Interactions, edited by J. Katsaras, T. Gutberlet (Springer, 2000)10.1007/978-3-662-04496-4 ↗
7. I. Burgess et al., Biophys. J. 86, 1763 (2004)10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74244-7 ↗
8. R.M. Thaokar, V. Kumaran, Phys. Rev. E 66, 051913 (2002)10.1103/PhysRevE.66.051913 ↗
9. H. Isambert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3404 (1998)10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.3404 ↗
10. V. Kumaran, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4996 (2000) and Phys. Rev. E 64, 011911 (2001)10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4996 ↗
11. D. Bensimon, F. David, S. Leibler, A. Pumir, J. Phys. (France) 51, 689 (1990)10.1051/jphys:01990005108068900 ↗
12. A.W.C. Lau, P. Pincus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1338 (1998)10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1338 ↗
13. Y.W. Kim, W. Sung, Europhys. Lett. 58, 147 (2002)10.1209/epl/i2002-00617-9 ↗
14. M. Kummrow, W. Helfrich, Phys. Rev. A 44, 8356 (1991)10.1103/PhysRevA.44.8356 ↗
15. P. Sens, H. Isambert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 128102 (2002)10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.128102 ↗
16. U. Mennicke, T. Salditt, Langmuir 18, 8172 (2002)10.1021/la025863f ↗
17. B.J. Berne, R. Pecora, Dynamic Light Scattering (Dover, Mineola, N.Y., 2000)
18. M. Vogel, PhD. Thesis, Universität Potsdam, Potsdam (2000)
19. T. Salditt, C. Li, A. Spaar, U. Mennicke, Eur. Phys. J. E 7, 105 (2002)10.1007/s10189-002-8222-1 ↗
20. U. Mennicke, D. Constantin, T. Salditt (submitted)
21. C. Ollinger, MSci. Thesis, Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken (2003)
22. L. Perino-Gallice, G. Fragneto, U. Mennicke, T. Salditt, F. Rieutord, Eur. Phys. J. E 8, 275 (2002)10.1140/epje/i2001-10101-0 ↗