Revealing the Role of Epithelial Mechanics and Macrophage Clearance during Pulmonary Epithelial Injury Recovery in the Presence of Carbon Nanotubes
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Wound healing assays are extensively used to study tissue repair mechanisms; they are typically performed by means of physical (i.e., mechanical, electrical, or optical) detachment of the cells in order to create an open space in which live cells can lodge. Herein, an advanced system based on extensive photobleaching‐induced apoptosis; providing a powerful tool to understand the repair response of lung epithelial tissue, consisting of a small injury area where apoptotic cells are still intact, is developed. Notably, the importance of epithelial mechanics and the presence of macrophages during the repair can be understood. The findings reveal that individual epithelial cells are able to clear the apoptotic cells by applying a pushing force, whilst macrophages actively phagocytose the dead cells to create an empty space. It is further shown that this repair mechanism is hampered when carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are introduced: formation of aberrant (i.e., thickening) F‐actins, maturation of focal adhesion, and increase in traction force leading to retardation in cell migration are observed. The results provide a mechanistic view of how CNTs can interfere with lung repair.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · Phagocytosis and Immune Regulation · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Adolphe Merkle Institute University of Fribourg Chemin des Verdiers 4 1700 Fribourg Switzerland
Department of High Energy Density Helmholtz‐Zentrum Dresden‐Rossendorf Bautzner Landstraße 400 01328 Dresden Germany
Department of Chemistry University of Fribourg Chemin du Musée 9 1700 Fribourg Switzerland
Funding
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung · Adolphe Merkle Foundation
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Kheradmand F. · Am. J. Physiol. · 1994 · 267 · L728
2. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.04.02310.1016/j.yexcr.2013.04.023 ↗
3. 10.1038/nphys304010.1038/nphys3040 ↗
4. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01247.x10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01247.x ↗
5. 10.1038/nprot.2007.3010.1038/nprot.2007.30 ↗
6. 10.1083/jcb.149.2.47110.1083/jcb.149.2.471 ↗
7. 10.1039/c1lc20879a10.1039/c1lc20879a ↗
8. 10.1002/tox.2224810.1002/tox.22248 ↗
9. 10.1007/s00018-015-2090-010.1007/s00018-015-2090-0 ↗
10. 10.3748/wjg.v18.i9.97910.3748/wjg.v18.i9.979 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevE.52.663510.1103/PhysRevE.52.6635 ↗
12. 10.1073/pnas.100829110710.1073/pnas.1008291107 ↗
13. 10.1007/s00249-015-1096-810.1007/s00249-015-1096-8 ↗
14. 10.1189/jlb.080652610.1189/jlb.0806526 ↗
15. 10.1164/ajrccm.155.1.900131910.1164/ajrccm.155.1.9001319 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)90465-110.1016/S0140-6736(96)90465-1 ↗
17. Byrne J. D. · Mcgill. J. Med. · 2008 · 11 · 43
18. 10.1186/1743-8977-8-2110.1186/1743-8977-8-21 ↗
19. 10.15252/msb.2015612310.15252/msb.20156123 ↗
20. 10.3109/17435390.2014.99334410.3109/17435390.2014.993344 ↗
21. 10.1002/adhm.20150025210.1002/adhm.201500252 ↗
22. 10.7150/ijbs.3.30310.7150/ijbs.3.303 ↗
23. D.Septiadi L.Rodriguez‐Lorenzo S.Balog M.Spuch H.Barosova S.Chortarea M. J. D.Clift J.Teeguarden M.Sharma A.Petri‐Fink B.Rothen‐Rutishauser unpublished.
24. 10.1002/adma.20170446310.1002/adma.201704463 ↗
25. 10.2147/IJN.S1045810.2147/IJN.S10458 ↗
26. 10.1093/toxsci/kfw01010.1093/toxsci/kfw010 ↗
27. 10.1021/bp00019a01610.1021/bp00019a016 ↗
28. 10.1186/1743-8977-8-410.1186/1743-8977-8-4 ↗
29. 10.1021/nl100533c10.1021/nl100533c ↗
30. Goedecke N. · J. Vis. Exp. · 2015 · 105 · 53350
31. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.05910.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.059 ↗
32. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv68610.1093/bioinformatics/btv686 ↗