Avoidance of Catastrophic Structural Failure as an Evolutionary Constraint: Biomechanics of the Acorn Weevil Rostrum
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The acorn weevil (Curculio Linnaeus, 1758) rostrum (snout) exhibits remarkable flexibility and toughness derived from the microarchitecture of its exoskeleton. Modifications to the composite profile of the rostral cuticle that simultaneously enhance the flexibility and toughness of the distal portion of the snout are characterized. Using classical laminate plate theory, the effect of these modifications on the elastic behavior of the exoskeleton is estimated. It is shown that the tensile behavior of the rostrum across six Curculio species with high morphological variation correlates with changes in the relative layer thicknesses and orientation angles of layers in the exoskeleton. Accordingly, increased endocuticle thickness is strongly correlated with increased tensile strength. Rostrum stiffness is shown to be inversely correlated with work of fracture; thus allowing a highly curved rostrum to completely straighten without structural damage. Finally, exocuticle rich invaginations of the occipital sutures are identified both as a likely site of crack initiation in tensile failure and as a source of morphological constraint on the evolution of the rostrum in Curculio weevils. It is concluded that avoidance of catastrophic structural failure, as initiated in these sutures under tension, is the driving selective pressure in the evolution of the female Curculio rostrum.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silk-based biomaterials and applications · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Life Sciences Arizona State University Tempe AZ 85287 USA
School for Engineering of Matter Energy, and Transport Arizona State University Tempe AZ 85287 USA
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jsb.2016.05.00710.1016/j.jsb.2016.05.007 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.asd.2004.05.00610.1016/j.asd.2004.05.006 ↗
3. 10.1007/BF0056121610.1007/BF00561216 ↗
4. van de Kamp T. · Entomol. Heute · 2010 · 22 · 191
5. 10.1016/j.asd.2015.10.00210.1016/j.asd.2015.10.002 ↗
6. 10.1242/jcs.21.1.7310.1242/jcs.21.1.73 ↗
7. 10.1038/nmat430910.1038/nmat4309 ↗
8. 10.1073/pnas.140958511110.1073/pnas.1409585111 ↗
9. 10.1098/rspb.2014.069610.1098/rspb.2014.0696 ↗
10. 10.1242/jeb.08382410.1242/jeb.083824 ↗
11. 10.1242/jeb.06822110.1242/jeb.068221 ↗
12. 1999
13. S. R.Davis Ph.D. Thesis University of Kansas2014.
14. 10.1016/j.matchar.2016.05.02210.1016/j.matchar.2016.05.022 ↗
15. 10.1086/49827710.1086/498277 ↗
16. Gibson L. P. · Misc. Publ. Entomol. Soc. Am. · 1969 · 6 · 239
17. 10.1098/rstb.1942.000310.1098/rstb.1942.0003 ↗
18. Morimoto K. · Esakia · 2003 · 43 · 13310.5109/2677 ↗
19. Ting P. C. · Mon. Bull. Dep. Agric., Calif. · 1933 · 22 · 161
20. Ting P. C. · Microentomology · 1936 · 1 · 93
21. L. A.Aguirre Uribe Ph.D. Thesis Texas A & M University1978.
22. Moffett M. · Natl. Geogr. Mag. · 1989 · 176 · 783
23. 10.1080/19768354.2017.133076410.1080/19768354.2017.1330764 ↗
24. 10.1126/sciadv.aao546910.1126/sciadv.aao5469 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.09.01510.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.09.015 ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20090201910.1002/adma.200902019 ↗
27. 10.1016/0022-2836(80)90156-410.1016/0022-2836(80)90156-4 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0040-8166(72)80042-910.1016/S0040-8166(72)80042-9 ↗
29. 10.1007/978-1-349-16673-210.1007/978-1-349-16673-2 ↗
30. 10.1557/jmr.2009.040910.1557/jmr.2009.0409 ↗
31. 10.1016/0020-7322(92)90004-710.1016/0020-7322(92)90004-7 ↗
32. 10.1201/b1240910.1201/b12409 ↗
33. Jones R. M. · 2014
34. 10.1016/j.ympev.2004.02.00710.1016/j.ympev.2004.02.007 ↗
35. 10.1111/jbi.1273310.1111/jbi.12733 ↗
36. 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00483.x10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00483.x ↗
37. 10.1007/s00442-011-2036-710.1007/s00442-011-2036-7 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.04.00410.1016/j.actbio.2011.04.004 ↗
39. 10.1098/rspa.2017.060710.1098/rspa.2017.0607 ↗
40. 10.1073/pnas.122278711010.1073/pnas.1222787110 ↗
41. 10.1086/28432510.1086/284325 ↗
42. 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00044.x10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00044.x ↗
43. It is possible that longer rostra also have a longer transition gradient from basal to apical profile; thereby reinforcing the junction between the rostrum and head capsule against buckling. Young's modulus of the rostrum would be comparatively higher in such species due to the higher volume fraction of exocuticle.
44. Beament J. W. L. · 1967
45. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.581-582.113310.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.581-582.1133 ↗
46. Greenhalgh E. · 2009