journal article·2017-07Open access

Optical, Thermal, and Mechanical Characterization of Ga2Se3‐Added GLS Glass

Andrea Ravagli, Christopher Craig, Ghada A. Alzaidy, Paul Bastock, Daniel W. Hewak

Advanced Materials· Volume 29· Issue 27

Abstract

Gallium lanthanum sulfide glass (GLS) has been widely studied in the last 40 years for middle‐infrared applications. In this work, the results of the substitution of selenium for sulphur in GLS glass are described. The samples are prepared via melt‐quench method in an argon‐purged atmosphere. A wide range of compositional substitutions are studied to define the glass‐forming region of the modified material. The complete substitution of Ga2S3 by Ga2Se3 is achieved by involving new higher quenching rate techniques compared to those containing only sulfides. The samples exhibiting glassy characteristics are further characterized. In particular, the optical and thermal properties of the sample are investigated in order to understand the role of selenium in the formation of the glass. The addition of selenium to GLS glass generally results in a lower glass transition temperature and an extended transmission window. Particularly, the IR edge is found to be extended from about 9 µm for GLS glass to about 15 µm for Se‐added GLS glass defined by the 50% transmission point. Furthermore, the addition of selenium does not affect the UV edge dramatically. The role of selenium is hypothesized in the glass formation to explain these changes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Phase-change materials and chalcogenides · Glass properties and applications · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Optoelectronics Research Centre University of Southampton Salisbury Road SO17 1BJ Southampton UK

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nphoton.2011.30910.1038/nphoton.2011.309 ↗
2. Sanghera J. S. · 1998
3. 10.1016/0022-3093(94)00686-510.1016/0022-3093(94)00686-5 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2003.08.06410.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2003.08.064 ↗
5. Hughes M. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 3
6. 10.1117/12.57825910.1117/12.578259 ↗
7. 10.1364/JOSAB.25.00145810.1364/JOSAB.25.001458 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0022-2313(96)00387-010.1016/S0022-2313(96)00387-0 ↗
9. 10.1364/OE.1.00010210.1364/OE.1.000102 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0022-3093(03)00439-310.1016/S0022-3093(03)00439-3 ↗
11. 10.1364/JOSAB.30.00249810.1364/JOSAB.30.002498 ↗
12. 10.1364/OE.18.02670410.1364/OE.18.026704 ↗
13. 10.1201/b1090810.1201/b10908 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.tca.2009.10.02310.1016/j.tca.2009.10.023 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2003.07.00210.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2003.07.002 ↗
16. Ferraro J. R. · 2003
17. P.Bastock C.Craig K.Khan E.Weatherby J.Yao D. W.Hewak CLEO 2015 IEEE San Jose CA USA2015.
18. 10.1533/9780857093561.1.310.1533/9780857093561.1.3 ↗
19. 10.1016/0921-5107(94)90243-710.1016/0921-5107(94)90243-7 ↗
20. 10.1002/adma.1992004061110.1002/adma.19920040611 ↗
21. Aggarwal I. D. · J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. · 2002 · 4 · 665
22. 10.1080/0146803005005880210.1080/01468030050058802 ↗
23. 10.1002/978047069770210.1002/9780470697702 ↗
24. Fel E. P. · Sov. Phys. JEPT · 1991 · 1704 · 951
25. 10.1016/S0022-3093(99)00485-810.1016/S0022-3093(99)00485-8 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.11.01810.1016/j.actbio.2011.11.018 ↗
27. 10.1007/BF0056197610.1007/BF00561976 ↗