The Key Role of Intrinsic Lifetime Dynamics from Upconverting Nanosystems in Multiemission Particle Velocimetry
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Evaluation of particle dynamics at the nano‐ and microscale poses a challenge to the development of novel velocimetry techniques. Established optical methods implement external or internal calibrations of the emission profiles by varying the particle velocity and are limited to specific experimental conditions. The proposed multiemission particle velocimetry approach aims to introduce a new concept for a luminescent probe, which guarantees accurate velocity measurements at the microscale, independent of the particle concentration or experimental setup, and without need for calibration. The simplicity of these analyses relies on the intrinsic luminescence dynamics of core–shell upconverting nanoparticles. Upon excitation with a focused near‐infrared pulsed laser, the nanoparticle emits photons at different wavelengths. The time interval between emissions from different excited states is independent of the local environment or particle velocity. The velocity of the particles is calculated by measuring the distance between the maxima of two different emissions and dividing it by the known difference in luminescence lifetimes. This method is demonstrated using simple digital imaging of nanoparticles flowing in 75–150 µm diameter capillaries. Using this novel approach typically results in a relative standard deviation of the experimental velocities of 5% or lower without any calibration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows · nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Optical properties and cooling technologies in crystalline materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry & Centre for Nanoscience Research Concordia University 7141 Sherbrooke W. Montreal H4B 1R6 Canada
Funding
Natural Science and Engineering Research Council
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1146/annurev.fl.23.010191.00140110.1146/annurev.fl.23.010191.001401 ↗
2. 10.1007/s00348-017-2386-y10.1007/s00348-017-2386-y ↗
3. 10.1021/ac025674210.1021/ac0256742 ↗
4. 10.1038/nnano.2016.11110.1038/nnano.2016.111 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsami.9b1750710.1021/acsami.9b17507 ↗
6. 10.1146/annurev-fluid-121108-14542710.1146/annurev-fluid-121108-145427 ↗
7. 10.1088/0957-0233/6/6/01210.1088/0957-0233/6/6/012 ↗
8. 10.1243/095440697152166510.1243/0954406971521665 ↗
9. R. E.Riman M.‐C.Tan (Rutgers State University of New Jersey) US20130320263A1 2013.
10. 10.1007/s00340-014-5997-510.1007/s00340-014-5997-5 ↗
11. 10.1007/s00348-008-0516-210.1007/s00348-008-0516-2 ↗
12. M. M. Koochesfahani R. K. Cohn C. P. Gendrich D. G. Nocera R. J. Adrian D. F. G. Durao F. Durst M. V. Heitor M. Maeda J. H. Whitelaw 1996 1.2.1 1.2.12
13. 10.1007/s00348005012310.1007/s003480050123 ↗
14. 10.1002/anie.20190444510.1002/anie.201904445 ↗
15. M.Weber Liquid‐Solid Flow http://thermopedia.com/content/51/(accessed: March2020).
16. 10.1016/0301-9322(95)00071-210.1016/0301-9322(95)00071-2 ↗
17. 10.1119/1.193357910.1119/1.1933579 ↗
18. 10.1126/sciadv.aao077310.1126/sciadv.aao0773 ↗
19. 10.1186/s11671-015-1006-010.1186/s11671-015-1006-0 ↗
20. 10.1080/01932691.2010.52833610.1080/01932691.2010.528336 ↗
21. Gamelin D. R. · 2001 · 1
22. 10.1016/0022-2313(90)90189-I10.1016/0022-2313(90)90189-I ↗
23. 10.1039/C9NR02291K10.1039/C9NR02291K ↗
24. 10.1039/c2lc41238a10.1039/c2lc41238a ↗
25. 10.1038/nature0877710.1038/nature08777 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41467-017-00916-710.1038/s41467-017-00916-7 ↗