Zero‐Depth Interfacial Nanopore Capillaries
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract High‐fidelity analysis of translocating biomolecules through nanopores demands shortening the nanocapillary length to a minimal value. Existing nanopores and capillaries, however, inherit a finite length from the parent membranes. Here, nanocapillaries of zero depth are formed by dissolving two superimposed and crossing metallic nanorods, molded in polymeric slabs. In an electrolyte, the interface shared by the crossing fluidic channels is mathematically of zero thickness and defines the narrowest constriction in the stream of ions through the nanopore device. This novel architecture provides the possibility to design nanopore fluidic channels, particularly with a robust 3D architecture maintaining the ultimate zero thickness geometry independently of the thickness of the fluidic channels. With orders of magnitude reduced biomolecule translocation speed, and lowered electronic and ionic noise compared to nanopores in 2D materials, the findings establish interfacial nanopores as a scalable platform for realizing nanofluidic systems, capable of single‐molecule detection.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Science Leiden Institute of Chemistry Leiden University 2333CC Leiden The Netherlands
Division of Solid‐State Electronics Department of Engineering Sciences Uppsala University 75121 Uppsala Sweden
Division of Materials Theory Department of Physics and Astronomy Uppsala University 75120 Uppsala Sweden
Funding
European Research Council · Vetenskapsrådet
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nbt.218110.1038/nbt.2181 ↗
2. 10.1039/C5CS00512D10.1039/C5CS00512D ↗
3. 10.1016/j.plrev.2012.05.01010.1016/j.plrev.2012.05.010 ↗
4. 10.1038/nnano.2011.12910.1038/nnano.2011.129 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.07.00610.1016/j.tibtech.2011.07.006 ↗
6. 10.1038/nnano.2007.2710.1038/nnano.2007.27 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20060119110.1002/adma.200601191 ↗
8. 10.1007/s00216-008-2529-310.1007/s00216-008-2529-3 ↗
9. 10.1021/ac302972c10.1021/ac302972c ↗
10. 10.1021/nn202989w10.1021/nn202989w ↗
11. 10.1038/nbt.214710.1038/nbt.2147 ↗
12. 10.1126/science.274.5294.185910.1126/science.274.5294.1859 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20080378610.1002/adma.200803786 ↗
14. 10.1021/nl102069z10.1021/nl102069z ↗
15. 10.1021/nl101046t10.1021/nl101046t ↗
16. 10.1038/nature0937910.1038/nature09379 ↗
17. 10.1038/srep0328710.1038/srep03287 ↗
18. 10.1021/nn502929510.1021/nn5029295 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0236910.1021/acsnano.5b02369 ↗
20. 10.1021/nn406102h10.1021/nn406102h ↗
21. 10.1038/nnano.2015.21910.1038/nnano.2015.219 ↗
22. 10.1038/nnano.2013.24010.1038/nnano.2013.240 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.298051810.1063/1.2980518 ↗
24. 10.1002/adma.20130133610.1002/adma.201301336 ↗
25. 10.1088/0957-4484/26/7/07400110.1088/0957-4484/26/7/074001 ↗
26. 10.1002/anie.20110102410.1002/anie.201101024 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.03590110.1103/PhysRevLett.93.035901 ↗
28. 10.1021/nl052107w10.1021/nl052107w ↗
29. 10.1529/biophysj.108.14047510.1529/biophysj.108.140475 ↗
30. 10.1021/nl204273h10.1021/nl204273h ↗
31. 10.1073/pnas.122001211010.1073/pnas.1220012110 ↗
32. 10.1371/journal.pone.001844210.1371/journal.pone.0018442 ↗
33. 10.1085/jgp.66.4.53110.1085/jgp.66.4.531 ↗
34. 10.1016/S0005-2736(97)00205-810.1016/S0005-2736(97)00205-8 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.08810110.1103/PhysRevLett.97.088101 ↗
36. 10.1088/0957-4484/20/9/09550110.1088/0957-4484/20/9/095501 ↗
37. 10.1073/pnas.070534910510.1073/pnas.0705349105 ↗
38. 10.1021/nl903631m10.1021/nl903631m ↗
39. 10.1038/nnano.2013.14410.1038/nnano.2013.144 ↗
40. 10.1021/nl902923710.1021/nl9029237 ↗