Controlled Crystal Plane Orientations in the ZnO Transport Layer Enable High‐Responsivity, Low‐Dark‐Current Infrared Photodetectors
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Colloidal quantum dots (CQD) have emerged as attractive materials for infrared (IR) photodetector (PD) applications because of their tunable bandgaps and facile processing. Presently, zinc oxide is the electron‐transport layer (ETL) of choice in CQD PDs; however, ZnO relies on continuous ultraviolet (UV) illumination to remove adsorbed oxygen and maintain high external quantum efficiency (EQE), speed, and photocurrent. Here, it is shown that ZnO is dominated by electropositive crystal planes which favor excessive oxygen adsorption, and that this leads to a high density of trap states, an undesired shift in band alignment, and consequent poor performance. Over prolonged operation without UV exposure, oxygen accumulates at the electropositive planes, trapping holes and degrading performance. This problem is addressed by developing an electroneutral plane composition at the ZnO surface, aided by atomic layer deposition (ALD) as the means of materials processing. It is found that ALD ZnO has 10× lower binding energy for oxygen than does conventionally deposited ZnO. IR CQD PDs made with this ETL do not require UV activation to maintain low dark current and high EQE.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Perovskite Materials and Applications · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
The Edward S. Rogers Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Toronto Toronto Ontario M5S 3G4 Canada
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nmat129910.1038/nmat1299 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.120984510.1126/science.1209845 ↗
3. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.1610.1038/nenergy.2016.16 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.matt.2020.12.01710.1016/j.matt.2020.12.017 ↗
5. 10.1038/nmat398410.1038/nmat3984 ↗
6. 10.1002/adfm.20140209410.1002/adfm.201402094 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0612510.1021/acsnano.9b06125 ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20210105610.1002/adma.202101056 ↗
9. 10.1002/1521-3773(20020402)41:7<1188::AID-ANIE1188>3.0.CO;2-510.1002/1521-3773(20020402)41:7<1188::AID-ANIE1188>3.0.CO;2-5 ↗
10. 10.1021/jp050745x10.1021/jp050745x ↗
11. 10.1002/adma.20160575610.1002/adma.201605756 ↗
12. 10.1038/nmat480010.1038/nmat4800 ↗
13. 10.1021/jp506641m10.1021/jp506641m ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20180172010.1002/adma.201801720 ↗
15. Egar D. · RCA Rev. · 1975 · 36 · 508
16. 10.1016/j.solmat.2010.06.00710.1016/j.solmat.2010.06.007 ↗
17. Lujala V. · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 1994 · 34 · 82
18. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2007.10.01010.1016/j.jcrysgro.2007.10.010 ↗
19. 10.1088/0957-4484/19/43/43560910.1088/0957-4484/19/43/435609 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.280080510.1063/1.2800805 ↗
21. 10.1002/smll.20170059810.1002/smll.201700598 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0024410.1021/acsenergylett.7b00244 ↗
23. 10.1038/srep0132410.1038/srep01324 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.317733710.1063/1.3177337 ↗
25. 10.1007/s40820-020-0371-010.1007/s40820-020-0371-0 ↗
26. 10.1039/c2cp23425d10.1039/c2cp23425d ↗
27. 10.1039/C9NR06346C10.1039/C9NR06346C ↗
28. 10.1063/1.185614110.1063/1.1856141 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsphotonics.0c0036310.1021/acsphotonics.0c00363 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsami.0c0174410.1021/acsami.0c01744 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.514025510.1063/1.5140255 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41377-020-0264-510.1038/s41377-020-0264-5 ↗
33. 10.1088/1361-6528/ab758e10.1088/1361-6528/ab758e ↗
34. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0634510.1021/acsnano.9b06345 ↗
35. 10.1002/adma.20030539510.1002/adma.200305395 ↗
36. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.0c0037910.1021/acsmaterialslett.0c00379 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.243241010.1063/1.2432410 ↗