journal article·2026-05Open access

Machine learning-driven discovery of high-performance Co/Sr-free air electrodes for protonic ceramic electrolysis cells

Ning Wang, Qingwen Su, Huanxin Xiang, Biyao Zhou, Jiaxin Huang, Fangyuan Zheng, Ruijie Zhu, Yoshitaka Aoki, Ling Meng, Feng Jiao, Baoyin Yuan, Chunmei Tang, Siyu Ye

eScience· Volume 6· Issue 3

Abstract

Protonic ceramic electrolysis cells (PCECs) have emerged as a promising solid-state ion device, attracting considerable attention for efficient hydrogen generation. However, PCECs face multiple constraints, most notably the lack of high-performance Co/Sr-free air electrodes. Because the current widely used air electrodes generally contain Co and Sr elements, they encounter serious problems of thermochemical expansion and Sr segregation. Traditional air electrode development primarily relies on experience-guided experiments and trial-and-error methods, which is time-consuming and inefficient in exploring vast material compositional spaces. The introduction of machine learning (ML)-driven discovery of air electrodes provides a transformative new approach to the fast development of PCECs. Here, based on the well-constructed ML models, high-performance novel Co/Sr-free Ca 0.5 La 0.5 Fe 1- x Sc x O 3- δ oxides are successfully designed as the air electrodes of PCECs. Among them, Ca 0.5 La 0.5 Fe 0.8 Sc 0.2 O 3- δ (CLFS0.2) oxide demonstrates exceptional properties, including the high hydrated proton defects amount (0.143 mol unit −1 at 550 °C), high catalytic activity, and low thermal expansion coefficient. As a result, PCEC with CLFS0.2 air electrode achieves a current density of 1.58 A cm −2 at 1.3 V at 650 °C, which is higher than the most of Co-free air electrodes and rivals mainstream Co/Sr-containing air electrodes. • A robust ML framework was employed to discover high-performance Co/Sr-free air electrodes. • CLFS0.2 demonstrated exceptional hydration ability with an HPC of 0.173 mol unit −1 at 500 °C. • Remarkable operational stability (200 h) and TEC (13.4 × 10 −6 K −1 ) confirmed the excellent robustness of CLFS0.2. • A record current density of 1.15 A·cm −2 at 1.3 V and 600 °C was achieved in PCEC with CLFS0.2 air electrode.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (87)

Show source-provided references
1. Batteries and fuel cells for emerging electric vehicle markets10.1038/s41560-018-0108-1 ↗
2. Triple ionic-electronic conducting oxides for next-generation electrochemical devices10.1038/s41563-020-00854-8 ↗
3. Advances and challenges in high-performance cathodes for protonic solid oxide fuel cells and machine learning–guided perspectives10.1016/j.nanoen.2024.109306 ↗
4. Green hydrogen production by intermediate-temperature protonic solid oxide electrolysis cells: advances, challenges, and perspectives
5. Advanced cathode materials for protonic ceramic fuel cells: recent progress and future perspectives
6. Revitalizing interface in protonic ceramic cells by acid etch10.1038/s41586-022-04457-y ↗
7. Shaping triple-conducting semiconductor BaCo0.4Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1O3–δ into an electrolyte for low-temperature solid oxide fuel cells10.1038/s41467-019-09532-z ↗
8. Machine-learning-accelerated development of efficient mixed protonic-electronic conducting oxides as the air electrodes for protonic ceramic cells10.1002/adma.202203446 ↗
9. Self-sustainable protonic ceramic electrochemical cells using a triple conducting electrode for hydrogen and power production10.1038/s41467-020-15677-z ↗
10. Magnesium tuned triple conductivity and bifunctionality of BaCo0.4Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1O3–δ perovskite towards reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121868 ↗
11. Robust bifunctional phosphorus-doped perovskite oxygen electrode for reversible proton ceramic electrochemical cells
12. Surface regulating of a double-perovskite electrode for protonic ceramic fuel cells to enhance oxygen reduction activity and contaminants poisoning tolerance
13. Surface restructuring of a perovskite-type air electrode for reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells10.1038/s41467-022-29866-5 ↗
14. Superior durability and activity of a benchmark triple-conducting cathode by tuning thermo-mechanical compatibility for protonic ceramic fuel cells
15. A real proton-conductive, robust, and cobalt-free cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells with exceptional performance10.1002/sus2.156 ↗
16. Protonic ceramic electrochemical cells for hydrogen production and electricity generation: exceptional reversibility, stability, and demonstrated faradaic efficiency10.1039/C8EE02865F ↗
17. Catalytic self-assembled air electrode for highly active and durable reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells10.1002/adfm.202206756 ↗
18. A superior catalytic air electrode with temperature-induced exsolution toward protonic ceramic cells10.1021/acsnano.3c12609 ↗
19. Synergistic bulk and surface engineering for expeditious and durable reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells air electrode
20. Phase engineering of a donor-doped air electrode for reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells
21. Thermal-expansion offset for high-performance fuel cell cathodes10.1038/s41586-021-03264-1 ↗
22. Zr and Y Co-doped perovskite as a stable, high performance cathode for solid oxide fuel cells operating below 500 °C10.1039/C6EE01915C ↗
23. Rational design of perovskite ferrites as high-performance proton-conducting fuel cell cathodes10.1038/s41929-022-00829-9 ↗
24. A novel cobalt-free cathode with triple-conduction for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells with unprecedented performance10.1039/C9TA02449B ↗
25. Facile deficiency engineering in a cobalt-free perovskite air electrode to achieve enhanced performance for protonic ceramic fuel cells10.1002/smll.202307900 ↗
26. In situ engineering of a cobalt-free perovskite air electrode enabling efficient reversible oxygen reduction/evolution reactions10.1002/adfm.202305567 ↗
27. Machine-learning assisted screening proton conducting Co/Fe based oxide for the air electrode of protonic solid oxide cell
28. Rational design of ruddlesden-popper perovskite ferrites as air electrode for highly active and durable reversible protonic ceramic cells10.1007/s40820-024-01397-2 ↗
29. Design of anode functional layers for protonic solid oxide electrolysis cells10.1039/D2TA02760G ↗
30. Nanocomposites: a new opportunity for developing highly active and durable bifunctional air electrodes for reversible protonic ceramic cells10.1002/aenm.202101899 ↗
31. Triple conducting perovskite Ba0.95La0.05Fe0.8Zn0.2O3–δ as oxygen electrode for reversible protonic ceramic cells10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.019 ↗
32. Ruddlesden–popper-structured (Pr0.9La0.1)2(Ni0.8Cu0.2)O4+δ: an effective oxygen electrode material for proton-conducting solid oxide electrolysis cells10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c03538 ↗
33. Exceptional power density and stability at intermediate temperatures in protonic ceramic fuel cells10.1038/s41560-017-0085-9 ↗
34. Incorporation of bulk proton carriers in cubic perovskite manganite driven by interplays of oxygen and manganese redox10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b02131 ↗
35. Mixed proton-electron-oxide ion triple conducting manganite as an efficient cobalt-free cathode for protonic ceramic fuel cells10.1039/D0TA03899G ↗
36. Tailoring the oxygen vacancy to achieve fast intrinsic proton transport in a perovskite cathode for protonic ceramic fuel cells10.1021/acsaem.0c00486 ↗
37. Mixed-conducting perovskites as cathode materials for protonic ceramic fuel cells: understanding the trends in proton uptake10.1002/adfm.201801241 ↗
38. Proton uptake in the H+-SOFC cathode material Ba0.5Sr0.5Fe0.8Zn0.2O3−δ: transition from hydration to hydrogenation with increasing oxygen partial pressure10.1039/C5FD00013K ↗
39. Proton conductivity in mixed-conducting BSFZ perovskite from thermogravimetric relaxation10.1039/C4CP00459K ↗
40. Synthesis of La1−xSrxSc1−yFeyO3−δ (LSSF) and measurement of water content in LSSF, LSCF and LSC hydrated in wet artificial air at 300 °C10.1016/j.ssi.2010.09.009 ↗
41. Yttrium-doped barium zirconate-cerate solid solution as proton conducting electrolyte: why higher cerium concentration leads to better performance for fuel cells and electrolysis cells10.1002/aenm.202003149 ↗
42. High proton conduction in grain-boundary-free yttrium-doped barium zirconate films grown by pulsed laser deposition10.1038/nmat2837 ↗
43. Opportunities and challenges for machine learning in materials science10.1146/annurev-matsci-070218-010015 ↗
44. Data-driven materials innovation and applications
45. High proton conductivity within the ‘Norby gap’ by stabilizing a perovskite with disordered intrinsic oxygen vacancies10.1038/s41467-023-43122-4 ↗
46. Single-phase La0.8Sr0.2Co1–xMnO3–δ electrocatalyst as a triple H+/O2-/e- conductor enabling high-performance intermediate-temperature water electrolysis10.1016/j.jmat.2022.02.012 ↗
47. La0.8Sr0.2Co1–xNixO3–δ as the efficient triple conductor air electrode for protonic ceramic cells10.1021/acsaem.0c02447 ↗
48. Correlation between hydration properties and electrochemical performances on Ln cation size effect in layered perovskite for protonic ceramic fuel cells10.1016/j.jechem.2023.09.004 ↗
49. Effects of sintering additives on defect chemistry and hydration of BaZr0.4Ce0.4(Y,Yb)0.2O3–δ proton conducting electrolytes10.1016/j.ssi.2023.116355 ↗
50. Proton uptake into the protonic cathode material BaCo0.4Fe0.4Zr0.2O3–δ and comparison to protonic electrolyte materials10.1016/j.ssi.2016.09.012 ↗
51. BaCo0.4Fe0.4Nb0.1Sc0.1O3–δ perovskite oxide with super hydration capacity for a high-activity proton ceramic electrolytic cell oxygen electrode10.1016/j.cej.2023.144878 ↗
52. Electron spin resonance probed suppressing of the cycloidal spin structure in doped bismuth ferrites10.1063/1.3451463 ↗
53. Modulating the energy band structure of the Mg-doped Sr0.5Pr0.5Fe0.2Mg0.2Ti0.6O3–δ electrolyte with boosted ionic conductivity and electrochemical performance for solid oxide fuel cells10.1021/acsami.2c06565 ↗
54. Local electronic structure modulation of interfacial oxygen vacancies promotes the oxygen activation capacity of Pt/Ce1–xMxO2–δ10.1021/acscatal.3c06234 ↗
55. Cu, Zn Co-doped ruddlesden-popper La1.2Sr0.8NiO4+δ oxides as high-performance air electrodes of medium-temperature protonic ceramic electrolysis cells10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.234141 ↗
56. Probing Zr substituting effects on the oxygen reduction reaction of Fe-based double perovskite cathodes for solid oxide fuel cells10.1021/acsaem.1c04080 ↗
57. Ca-doped PrBa1–xCaxCoCuO5+δ (x = 0-0.2) as cathode materials for solid oxide fuel cells10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.11.310 ↗
58. A novel triple-conductive cathode with high efficiency and stability for protonic ceramic fuel cells10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.04.351 ↗
59. Nickel-doped BaCo0.4Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1O3–δ as a new high-performance cathode for both oxygen-ion and proton conducting fuel cells10.1016/j.cej.2020.127717 ↗
60. Thermal cycling durability improved by doping fluorine to PrBaCo2O5+δ as oxygen reduction reaction electrocatalyst in intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.09.065 ↗
61. A CO2-tolerant SrCo0.8Fe0.15Zr0.05O3–δ cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells10.1039/D0TA02435J ↗
62. La0.5Ba0.5CuxFe1–xO3–δ as cathode for high-performance proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cell10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121485 ↗
63. A comparative study on the composite cathodes with proton conductor and oxygen ion conductor for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cell10.1016/j.electacta.2020.136143 ↗
64. High total proton conductivity in large-grained yttrium-doped barium zirconate10.1021/cm900208w ↗
65. Tailoring gadolinium-doped ceria-based solid oxide fuel cells to achieve 2 W cm-2 at 550 °C10.1038/ncomms5045 ↗
66. Readily processed protonic ceramic fuel cells with high performance at low temperatures10.1126/science.aab3987 ↗
67. Self-assembled triple-conducting nanocomposite as a superior protonic ceramic fuel cell cathode10.1016/j.joule.2019.07.004 ↗
68. Rationally designed air electrode boosting electrochemical performance of protonic ceramic cells10.1002/aenm.202402654 ↗
69. Machine learning tailored anodes for efficient hydrogen energy generation in proton-conducting solid oxide electrolysis cells10.1007/s40820-025-01764-7 ↗
70. Protonated BaZr0.8Y0.2O3–δ: impact of hydration on electrochemical conductivity and local crystal structure10.1021/acsaem.0c02832 ↗
71. Protonic conduction in La2NiO4+δ and La2–xAxNiO4+δ (A = Ca, Sr, Ba) ruddlesden-popper type oxides10.1002/aenm.202200392 ↗
72. Tuning the defects of the triple conducting oxide BaCo0.4Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1O3–δ perovskite toward enhanced cathode activity of protonic ceramic fuel cells10.1039/C9TA04335G ↗
73. Accelerated discovery of proton-conducting perovskite oxide by capturing physicochemical fundamentals of hydration10.1021/acsenergylett.1c01239 ↗
74. Defect chemistry of yttrium-doped barium zirconate: a thermodynamic analysis of water uptake10.1021/cm800843s ↗
75. Highly durable, coking and sulfur tolerant, fuel-flexible protonic ceramic fuel cells10.1038/s41586-018-0082-6 ↗
76. Proton conducting alkaline earth zirconates and titanates for high drain electrochemical applications10.1016/S0167-2738(01)00953-5 ↗
77. Fast and stable proton conduction in heavily Scandium-doped polycrystalline barium zirconate at intermediate temperatures10.1002/aenm.202000213 ↗
78. Incorporation of a proton into La0.9Sr0.1(Yb1–xMx)O3–δ (M = Y, In)10.1016/j.ssi.2013.11.044 ↗
79. High-performance protonic ceramic fuel cell cathode using protophilic mixed ion and electron conducting material10.1039/D1TA07113K ↗
80. An active and stable cobalt-free ruddlesden-popper Nd0.8Sr1.2Ni1–xFexO4±δ air electrode for reversible proton-conducting solid oxide cells
81. Tailoring Pr0.5Sr0.5FeO3 oxides with Mn cations as a cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells10.1016/j.elecom.2024.107685 ↗
82. Energy storage and hydrogen production by proton conducting solid oxide electrolysis cells with a novel heterogeneous design10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113044 ↗
83. Synergistic coupling of proton conductors BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.1Yb0.1O3–δ and La2Ce2O7 to create chemical stable, interface active alectrolyte for steam electrolysis cells10.1021/acsami.9b00303 ↗
84. Investigation of real polarization resistance for electrode performance in proton-conducting electrolysis cells10.1039/C8TA06862C ↗
85. Triple-conducting Zn-doped Pr1.8Ba0.2NiO4+δ air electrodes for proton ceramic electrolysis cells10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233652 ↗
86. High-entropy perovskite oxide: a new opportunity for developing highly active and durable air electrode for reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells10.1007/s40820-022-00967-6 ↗
87. Highly efficient reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells for power generation and fuel production10.1038/s41560-019-0333-2 ↗