Operando studies of lithium–sulfur redox reactions: A review
Source abstract
Abstract
In situ / operando techniques have been foundational for achieving a deep understanding of the complex, multistep Li–S redox reactions to enable the practical application of Li–S batteries. This includes a fundamental grasp of the traditional solid–liquid–solid Li–S transformations involved, as well as a thorough understanding of the interfacial processes under more realistic conditions. Herein, we present a selective review of Li–S redox reactions based on solid–liquid–solid and solid–solid transformation processes and under pouch cell conditions, mainly via in situ / operando tools that include in situ atomic force microscopy, operando confocal Raman imaging, and X-ray methods. While studies in model electrochemical cells provide a basic understanding of the redox reactions, pouch-cell-level, multimodal analysis provides a more detailed picture of the delicate interplay of the processes involved and sheds light on the pathways that may lead to capacity fade. We anticipate that continuous advances in in situ / operando techniques, along with calculation/simulation tools, will yield a deep and detailed understanding of Li–S reactions, with the ultimate goal of achieving high-performance batteries that can be broadly deployed. • In situ / operando studies reveal lithium–sulfur redox reactions. • Insights into the lithium–sulfur reactions following solid-liquid-solid and (quasi-)solid-solid transformations are provided. • Operando investigation inside pouch cells show the failure reasons and modes under practical conditions of cell operation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (89)
Show source-provided references
1. Crack-free single-crystalline Co-free Ni-rich LiNi0.95Mn0.05O2 layered cathode10.1016/j.esci.2022.02.006 ↗
2. Sputtered MoN nanolayer as a multifunctional polysulfide catalyst for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries10.1016/j.esci.2022.03.003 ↗
3. Advances in Li–S batteries10.1039/b925751a ↗
4. Lithium–sulfur batteries: electrochemistry, materials, and prospects10.1002/anie.201304762 ↗
5. A highly ordered nanostructured carbon–sulphur cathode for lithium–sulphur batteries10.1038/nmat2460 ↗
6. Construction of organic-rich solid electrolyte interphase for long-cycling lithium–sulfur batteries
7. High-temperature formation of a functional film at the cathode/electrolyte interface in lithium–sulfur batteries: an in situ AFM study10.1002/ange.201706979 ↗
8. Insight into the interfacial process and mechanism in lithium–sulfur batteries: an in situ AFM study10.1002/anie.201608730 ↗
9. Understanding the lithium–sulfur battery redox reactions via operando confocal Raman microscopy10.1038/s41467-022-32139-w ↗
10. Multimodal operando analysis of lithium sulfur multilayer pouch cells: an in-depth investigation on cell component design and performance10.1002/aenm.202404256 ↗
11. Thermal runaway routes of large-format lithium-sulfur pouch cell batteries10.1016/j.joule.2022.02.015 ↗
12. Operando pulse electrochemical mass spectrometry for nondestructive and long-term gas analysis in practical lithium-ion pouch batteries10.1021/acsenergylett.4c01305 ↗
13. Deciphering the reaction mechanism of lithium–sulfur batteries by in situ/operando synchrotron-based characterization techniques
14. In situ optical spectroscopy characterization for optimal design of lithium–sulfur batteries10.1039/C9CS00381A ↗
15. In situ/operando Raman techniques in lithium–sulfur batteries10.1002/sstr.202100170 ↗
16. In situ gas analysis by differential electrochemical mass spectrometry for advanced rechargeable batteries: a review
17. Solid-state NMR and MRI spectroscopy for Li/Na batteries: materials, interface, and in situ characterization
18. Tracking lithiation with transmission electron microscopy10.1007/s11426-022-1486-1 ↗
19. Lithium sulfur batteries with compatible electrolyte both for stable cathode and dendrite-free anode10.1016/j.ensm.2018.05.014 ↗
20. Prospect of sulfurized pyrolyzed poly(acrylonitrile) (S@pPAN) cathode materials for rechargeable lithium batteries10.1002/anie.201913540 ↗
21. Duplex component additive of tris(trimethylsilyl) phosphite-vinylene carbonate for lithium sulfur batteries10.1016/j.ensm.2018.02.004 ↗
22. Bridging the gap between academic research and industrial development in advanced all-solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries10.1039/D3CS00439B ↗
23. Understanding electrochemical reaction mechanisms of sulfur in all-solid-state batteries through operando and theoretical studies10.1002/anie.202302363 ↗
24. Visualizing reaction fronts and transport limitations in solid-state Li–S batteries via operando neutron imaging10.1002/aenm.202203426 ↗
25. Asymmetric sulfur redox paths in sulfide-based all-solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c03317 ↗
26. Recent advances and applications toward emerging lithium–sulfur batteries: working principles and opportunities10.1002/eem2.12257 ↗
27. Insight into the failure mechanism of large-scale cylindrical lithium–sulphur cells10.1039/D3CC02730A ↗
28. A volcano correlation between catalytic activity for sulfur reduction reaction and Fe atom count in metal center10.1021/jacs.3c14312 ↗
29. Cathode kinetics evaluation in lean-electrolyte lithium–sulfur batteries10.1021/jacs.3c02786 ↗
30. Key parameters governing the energy density of rechargeable Li/S batteries10.1021/jz5001819 ↗
31. Electrolyte decomposition and electrode thickness changes in Li-S cells with lithium metal anodes, prelithiated silicon anodes and hard carbon anodes10.1149/2.0161801jes ↗
32. Reaction heterogeneity in practical high-energy lithium–sulfur pouch cells10.1039/D0EE02088E ↗
33. Influence of external stack pressure on the performance of Li-S pouch cell10.1088/2515-7655/ac4ee3 ↗
34. In-situ X-ray tomographic imaging study of gas and structural evolution in a commercial Li-ion pouch cell10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230818 ↗
35. A quantum-chemical study on the discharge reaction mechanism of lithium-sulfur batteries10.1016/S2095-4956(13)60009-1 ↗
36. Conductive lewis base matrix to recover the missing link of Li2 S8 during the sulfur redox cycle in Li–S battery10.1021/cm5044667 ↗
37. Formation of large polysulfide complexes during the lithium-sulfur battery discharge10.1103/PhysRevApplied.2.034004 ↗
38. Combination of lightweight elements and nanostructured materials for batteries10.1021/ar800229g ↗
39. Graphene oxide as a sulfur immobilizer in high performance lithium/sulfur cells10.1021/ja206955k ↗
40. Improving the performance of lithium–sulfur batteries by conductive polymer coating10.1021/nn203436j ↗
41. Porous carbon nanofiber–sulfur composite electrodes for lithium/sulfur cells10.1039/c1ee02256c ↗
42. Toward a molecular understanding of energetics in Li–S batteries using nonaqueous electrolytes: a high-level quantum chemical study10.1021/jp5015466 ↗
43. Modulating molecular orbital energy level of lithium polysulfide for high-rate and long-life lithium-sulfur batteries10.1016/j.ensm.2019.07.035 ↗
44. Predicting the composition and formation of solid products in lithium–sulfur batteries by using an experimental phase diagram10.1039/C6CC05881G ↗
45. Phase equilibrium thermodynamics of lithium–sulfur batteries10.1038/s44286-024-00115-4 ↗
46. Analytical detection of polysulfides in the presence of adsorption additives by operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b05609 ↗
47. Dynamic visualization of cathode/electrolyte evolution in quasi-solid-state lithium batteries10.1002/aenm.202000465 ↗
48. Multidimensional visualization of the dynamic evolution of Li metal via in situ/operando methods10.1073/pnas.2220419120 ↗
49. Direct tracking of additive-regulated evolution on the lithium anode in quasi-solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries10.1002/aenm.202201411 ↗
50. Tunable structure and dynamics of solid electrolyte interphase at lithium metal anode10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104967 ↗
51. Tailoring pore size of nitrogen-doped hollow carbon nanospheres for confining sulfur in lithium–sulfur batteries10.1002/aenm.201401752 ↗
52. Revealing the high salt concentration manipulated evolution mechanism on the lithium anode in quasi-solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries10.1002/anie.202212744 ↗
53. In-operando optical imaging of temporal and spatial distribution of polysulfides in lithium-sulfur batteries10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.11.001 ↗
54. Sulfur speciation in Li–S batteries determined by operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy10.1021/jz401763d ↗
55. Establishing reaction networks in the 16-electron sulfur reduction reaction10.1038/s41586-023-06918-4 ↗
56. Unraveling the lithium iodide-mediated interfacial process in lithium-sulfur batteries: an in situ AFM study
57. Visualizing interfacial collective reaction behaviour of Li–S batteries10.1038/s41586-023-06326-8 ↗
58. In situ Raman spectroscopy of sulfur speciation in lithium–sulfur batteries10.1021/am5072942 ↗
59. Fundamental mechanistic insights into the catalytic reactions of li─s redox by Co single-atom electrocatalysts via operando methods10.1126/sciadv.adi5108 ↗
60. Promoting the transformation of Li2S2 to Li2S: significantly increasing utilization of active materials for high-sulfur-loading Li–S batteries
61. Solid/quasi-solid phase conversion of sulfur in lithium–sulfur battery
62. Building a cycle-stable sulphur cathode by tailoring its redox reaction into a solid-phase conversion mechanism10.1039/C8TA08159J ↗
63. Engineering peculiar cathode electrolyte interphase toward sustainable and high-rate Li–S batteries10.1002/aenm.202300229 ↗
64. Realizing solid-phase reaction in Li–S batteries via localized high-concentration carbonate electrolyte10.1002/aenm.202101004 ↗
65. Tuning the electrolyte network structure to invoke quasi-solid state sulfur conversion and suppress lithium dendrite formation in Li–S batteries10.1038/s41560-018-0214-0 ↗
66. Effect of the hydrofluoroether cosolvent structure in acetonitrile-based solvate electrolytes on the Li+ solvation structure and Li–S battery performance10.1021/acsami.7b11566 ↗
67. Effect of chemical reactivity of polysulfide toward carbonate-based electrolyte on the electrochemical performance of Li–S batteries10.1016/j.electacta.2013.06.039 ↗
68. A solid-phase conversion sulfur cathode with full capacity utilization and superior cycle stability for lithium-sulfur batteries
69. A high-energy sulfur cathode in carbonate electrolyte by eliminating polysulfides via solid-phase lithium-sulfur transformation10.1038/s41467-018-06877-9 ↗
70. A solid-solid biphasic conversion of Li-S battery revealed by coordinated carbonate electrolyte10.1039/C5TA06869J ↗
71. Unique behaviour of nonsolvents for polysulphides in lithium–sulphur batteries10.1039/C4EE00372A ↗
72. Lithium storage in conductive sulfur-containing polymers
73. A novel conductive polymer-sulfur composite cathode material for rechargeable lithium batteries10.1002/1521-4095(20020705)14:13/14<963::AID-ADMA963>3.0.CO;2-P ↗
74. Structure-related electrochemistry of sulfur-poly(acrylonitrile) composite cathode materials for rechargeable lithium batteries10.1021/cm202467u ↗
75. Origin of shuttle-free sulfurized polyacrylonitrile in lithium-sulfur batteries10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229508 ↗
76. Nonuniform redistribution of sulfur and lithium upon cycling: probing the origin of capacity fading in lithium–sulfur pouch cells10.1002/ente.201900111 ↗
77. Revealing principles for design of lean-electrolyte lithium metal anode via in situ spectroscopy10.1021/jacs.9b11774 ↗
78. Electrolyte decomposition and gas evolution in a lithium-sulfur cell upon long-term cycling10.1016/j.electacta.2017.05.034 ↗
79. Unlocking failure mechanisms and improvement of practical Li–S pouch cells through in operando pressure study
80. Diagnostic of failure mechanisms in Li/S rechargeable batteries using thermal micro-calorimetry technique applied to pouch and cylindrical type cells10.1016/j.electacta.2018.09.167 ↗
81. Interfacial self-healing polymer electrolytes for long-cycle solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries10.1038/s41467-023-43467-w ↗
82. Ultrasonic scanning to observe wetting and “unwetting” in Li-Ion pouch cells10.1016/j.joule.2020.07.014 ↗
83. Toward practical high-energy-density lithium–sulfur pouch cells: a review
84. Ultrafast absorption of polysulfides through electrostatic confinement by protonated molecules for highly efficient Li–S batteries10.1021/acsami.0c10811 ↗
85. New insights into the relationship between capacity fading and sulfur loading and electrolyte/sulfur ratio obtained from Li–S pouch cell10.1007/s11581-021-04122-w ↗
86. Deciphering the degradation mechanism of high-rate and high-energy-density lithium–sulfur pouch cells10.1002/aenm.202301770 ↗
87. Unraveling the catalyst-solvent interactions in lean-electrolyte sulfur reduction electrocatalysis for Li−S batteries10.1002/anie.202213863 ↗
88. Towards stable lithium-sulfur batteries: mechanistic insights into electrolyte decomposition on lithium metal anode10.1016/j.ensm.2017.01.003 ↗
89. The critical role of lithium nitrate in the gas evolution of lithium–sulfur batteries10.1039/C6EE00789A ↗