journal article·2020-01Open access

Influence of horizontal restraints on the behaviour of vertical disproportionate collapse of RC moment frames

Mengzhu Diao, Yi Li, Hong Guan, Xinzheng Lu, Benoit P. Gilbert

Abstract

Abstract Current research studies on progressive collapse of reinforced concrete (RC) moment frames mainly focus on the RC frames with strong horizontal restraints in which collapse only propagates in the vertical direction. Notwithstanding, progressive collapse may propagate in the horizontal direction due to insufficient lateral stiffness and bearing capacity of the real-world structural systems, eventually triggering a wider range of damage associated with a disproportionate collapse. A static collapse test on three asymmetric beam-column substructure specimens with flange slabs was conducted to analyse the effects of different lateral restraints on the progressive collapse behaviour of RC beam-column specimens. The three specimens, including two one-story and one two-story substructures, are designated as OP, TP and OA, in which OP and OA represent one-story penultimate and antepenult column removal scenarios, respectively, while TP represents a two-story penultimate column removal scenario. Comparing to OP, an extra bay and an extra floor were added in OA and TP, respectively, to create different horizontal restraint scenarios. Experimental results show that under the compressive arch action (CAA), the contribution of the CAA within the beams and slabs in OP and TP was significantly reduced compared to that in OA. Under the catenary action (CA), the collapse resistance of OA was found to develop rapidly to exceed even the peak resistance of CAA, whereas the resistance of OP and TP varied marginally, caused by the continuously released axial force of rebars within the beams and flange slabs. Additionally, the final failure mode of all three specimens demonstrated a compression-bending failure of the edge and penultimate columns. Subsequent to the experiments, a fibre-beam-element-based model was built to analyse the development of the internal forces within the slab-flange beams and columns. In the numerical analyses, the penultimate column in OA was found to damage prior to the edge column, owing to its larger axial force generated from the redistributed force and the additional bending moment. While in TP, the so-called Vierendeel truss action led to an uneven internal force distribution developed within the two floors, causing the failure to propagate from the lower story to the upper story. Finally, design recommendations are provided based on the results obtained from the experimental test and numerical simulation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Mitigating risk from abnormal loads and progressive collapse10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:4(315) ↗
2. Typology of progressive collapse10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.11.025 ↗
3. Effects of rotational capacity and horizontal restraint on development of catenary action in 2-D RC frames10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.09.059 ↗
4. Effect of boundary conditions on the behaviour of composite frames against progressive collapse10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.07.005 ↗
5. Investigations of tensile membrane action in beam-slab systems under progressive collapse subject to different loading configurations and boundary conditions10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.060 ↗
6. Research and practice on progressive collapse and robustness of building structures in the 21st century10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.082 ↗
7. Corley · 1996
8. Department of Defense (DoD), Design of Structures to Resist Progressive Collapse, Unified facilities criteria UFC-4-023-03, Washington D.C., 2009.
9. General Service Administration (GSA), Progressive Collapse Analysis and Design Guidelines for New Federal Office Buildings and Major Modernization Projects, Washington D.C., 2003.
10. Approaches for design against progressive collapse10.1061/JSDEAG.0004876 ↗
11. Experimental study on progressive collapse-resistant behaviour of reinforced concrete frame structures
12. Experimental study on the progressive collapse performance of RC frames with infill walls10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.12.010 ↗
13. Analytical model for the capacity of compressive arch action of reinforced concrete sub-assemblages10.1680/macr.13.00217 ↗
14. Structural behaviour of reinforced concrete frames subjected to progressive collapse10.14359/51689424 ↗
15. Experimental investigation of reinforced concrete exterior beam-column sub-assemblages for progressive collapse
16. Load-carrying mechanism to resist progressive collapse of RC buildings10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001046 ↗
17. Collapse test of three-story half-scale reinforced concrete frame building10.14359/51687746 ↗
18. Probability-based progressive collapse-resistant assessment for building structures10.1177/1369433216649385 ↗
19. Assessment of dynamic increase factor for progressive collapse analysis of RC structures10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.11.011 ↗
20. Experimental study on dynamic responses of reinforced concrete frames under sudden column removal applying concentrated loading10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.002 ↗
21. Progressive collapse resistance demand of RC frames under catenary mechanism10.14359/51687029 ↗
22. An improved tie force method for progressive collapse resistance design of reinforced concrete frame structures10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.06.017 ↗
23. Progressive collapse resistance of axially-restrained frame beams
24. Testing and analysis of steel and concrete beam-column assemblies under a column removal scenario10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000422 ↗
25. Experimental study on the progressive collapse resistance of RC slabs
26. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China (MOHURD), Code for design of concrete structures, GB50010-2010, Beijing, China, 2010.
27. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China (MOHURD), Code for seismic design of buildings, GB50011-2010, Beijing, China, 2010.
28. Experimental and numerical investigation on progressive collapse resistance of reinforced concrete beam column sub-assemblages10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.08.040 ↗
29. Experimental investigation of RC beam-slab substructures against progressive collapse subject to an edge-column-removal scenario10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.07.039 ↗
30. F.F. Taucer, E. Spacone, F.C. Filippou, A fiber beam-column element for seismic response analysis of reinforced concrete structures, Report No. UCB/EERC-91/17, American, UC Berkeley, 1991.
31. Fiber beam-column model for non-linear analysis of R/C frames. Part 1: Formulation10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199607)25:7<711::AID-EQE576>3.0.CO;2-9 ↗
32. Collapse simulation of reinforced concrete high-rise building induced by extreme earthquakes10.1002/eqe.2240 ↗
33. Numerical investigation of progressive collapse resistance of reinforced concrete frames subject to column removals from different stories10.1177/1369433215624515 ↗
34. MSC, MARC, Element library, User’s Manual, vol. B, MSC. Software Corporation, 2007.
35. Analytical and numerical modeling of prestressed continuous steel-concrete composite beams10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000409 ↗
36. Deformations of reinforced concrete members at yielding and ultimate
37. T. Hitaka, Y. Imadzu, Seismic behaviour of R/C non-structural walls, in: Proc. 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, in CD-ROM, 2008.
38. Constitutive laws of concrete in tension and reinforcing bars stiffened by concrete
39. Ductility of square-confined concrete columns10.1061/JSDEAG.0005933 ↗
40. Flexural members with confined concrete10.1061/JSDEAG.0002957 ↗
41. Fibre beam-column element model considering reinforcement anchorage slip in the footing10.1007/s10518-016-9987-3 ↗
42. EN1991-1-7, Eurocode1: actions on structures. Part 1-7: General actions - accidental actions, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 2006.